Terronium-12For those that haven't experienced yet another pure gold PD phenomena:
I think it's winking at me...
Ahhhh it's a decepticon!
Terronium-12For those that haven't experienced yet another pure gold PD phenomena:
I think it's winking at me...
For those that haven't experienced yet another pure gold PD phenomena:
http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff100/Slayer_AC/TokyoR246_zps7b46c565.jpg
I think it's winking at me...
For those complaining about the sound, I hope you realise that sound heard as a spectator is vastly different from sound heard as a driver or sound heard at the exhaust. The doppler effect as spectator and selective shielding of certain frequency within the cockpit would greatly distort what you hear. As such, I am predisposed to assume that PD has more priviledged access and perhaps better microphone than spectators had with a run-of-the-mill videocamera.
As an example, try listening to the Boeing 747 as passenger and then as part of send off party. The sound received is dramatically different and the doppler effect would be super evident. If the Boeing flight simulator gives you sound like what you experience as spectator, it would sound at once awesome and unrealistic.
You can conduct your own test with your own car. Get someone to record your car sound at near redline at low gear down a stretch as spectator and put a recorder in your own car plus one at the bonnet. It could raise some eyebrows on the difference.
May I ask what those settings were?
On-line/off-line?
Aids?
Gripreduction?
Stock or upgraded car?
Tires?
Fuel/tire wear?
Cause if I recall, I've seen stock NISMO Z's (premium) lapping around Suzuka on Racing Hards in 1:55's..
Same for the GT-R's.
For those that haven't experienced yet another pure gold PD phenomena:
![]()
I think it's winking at me...
2 seconds slower in comparison to Xanavi Z and GTR (2:05 @ Suzuka), while Weider only managed 2:07 with the same exact settings.
However, much of the community here is wrong. The thing is, people were actually expecting PD to get the sound right. Let me just go on a quick rant here.
Do you guys know nothing? Why would you expect PD to get a sound right at all at this point in time? I mean, the HSV-010's sound would be damn hard to get right in the first place at all, and surely if you were one to complain about the HSV-010's sound, then surely you would know that PD would completely wreck it to hell? Why was there ever any hype? I mean, I'd be able to count on both of my hands the number of cars PD have managed to build that sound realistic. Did you seriously expect them to nail something like the HSV-010? Get real.
I did a best of 2.04.xxx stock at Suzuka with the weider. Is yours broken in to the max 517 HP? I will try the Z later today for comparison.
At Nurb I did nearly the same time 6.34.xxx with the weider as with the Takata NSX, despite the HSV-010 stock gears not being very good for Nurb.
In stock form I think it's right up there with the best Super GT's. Adjusting the gears would make it even faster at both tracks since 6th is hardly used with default settings.
Fantastic car,
Crap ugly sound.
517 HP? No. In stock with oil change, it goes to 503, while Xanavi Z goes 524, and Xanavi GTR to 508.
For those that haven't experienced yet another pure gold PD phenomena:
![]()
I think it's winking at me...
I know this is pedantic, but given we're all gamers here, I think it's justified.
Those aren't pixels, rather vertices in the polygon mesh; "pixel" is a sort of shortened form of "picture element" (because everything needs to be divided up into discrete parts before it can be stored / used in a computer, hence the vertices, too); a similar thing applies to textures ("texels"), and even 3D space ("voxels") etc.
I did a best of 2.04.xxx stock at Suzuka with the weider. Is yours broken in to the max 517 HP? I will try the Z later today for comparison.
At Nurb I did nearly the same time 6.34.xxx with the weider as with the Takata NSX, despite the HSV-010 stock gears not being very good for Nurb.
In stock form I think it's right up there with the best Super GT's. Adjusting the gears would make it even faster at both tracks since 6th is hardly used with default settings.
I turned all the assists off except ASM and managed 2.06.xxx with cold tyres (RH) in the first lap at Suzuka. Still 1 sec slower than Xanavi GTR, but i guess i'll master it in a few days.
I turned all the assists off except ASM and managed 2.06.xxx with cold tyres (RH) in the first lap at Suzuka. Still 1 sec slower than Xanavi GTR, but i guess i'll master it in a few days.
I ran about 5 laps each car, Suzuka is definitely not my best track or anything but just for comparison purposes:
All stock, no settings changes, ABS 1, no other aids, track grip real:
Xanavi Nismo Z '06 2.00.529
Xanavi GT-R '08 2.01.997
Honda HSV-010 '11 2.02.788
Stock gears suck on the HSV-010 though, the max speed is set to 228 while the Xanavi's are set to 196. Just for fun I changed the gears on the HSV-010 to max 196 and did 2 laps and got a 2.01.648 so it's right in the ballpark with the best Super GT cars. It is by far the easiest of the three to drive.
So, the 2 sec. difference from Z is still there anyway. I don't know about you, but imho, Xanavi Z is still the most fun (and the better overall) Super GT car in the game. I like it's tremendous torque and it's nervousness at the back end (really helpful at technical circuits). HSV is pretty good aswell, but it comes short in comparison to other GT-500 cars because of it's low torque.
2:04-07's means 9-12 seconds are lost somehow. And with such a huge amount of time still in the cars you're driving, it's really hard to say if the difference is in the car, or elsewhere.