Err... if you took out ALL the Skylines, Subis, Mistus, RX-7s and Miatas, you'd still have more than 800 cars. Unconvinced.
As I posted in another thread, of the 1000+ cars in GT5 over 500 of them are Japanese cars produced after 1990.
Err... if you took out ALL the Skylines, Subis, Mistus, RX-7s and Miatas, you'd still have more than 800 cars. Unconvinced.
They don't test every car around a track.As others pointed out in other threads, perhaps this one too, Kaz prefers that every car possible gets tested and run around a track.
You say that like it's a bad thing.![]()
Besides the fact that I bought almost all those 500-plus Japanese cars - and intend to buy every car in the game if I can, that still means that there are around 500 cars which aren't Japanese.
As others pointed out in other threads, perhaps this one too, Kaz prefers that every car possible gets tested and run around a track. Well, guess which country Polyphony Digital is in? It's way easier to test cars from your home turf, and less expensive to boot.
However... let me throw a monkeywrench in this debate by bringing up an interesting fact. Discounting the Racing Carts and Red Bull Prototype, and prior to the DLC,
Premium Cars
Japanese: 106
Non-Japanese: 113
Now I'm sure the sour grapes bunch are grumbling, "Well... but it's about time!"
They didn't have to make the car list like this though, so keep this in mind when people complain that PD has a Japanese bias. Things seem to be evening out. Even though Australia is still getting ignored a bit...
GT3 - Less is sometimes better. There's no need for umpteen different standard versions of R32 Skylines, R33 Skylines, R34 Skylines, Mazda MX-5's, Honda S2000's... etc
-> One thing that I would like to point out that I forgot to mention is this symbol:
[R]
^ This highlight means that the car is a race-spec vehicle or a race-modified car. This designation only applied in GT1 and GT2.
-> Heres an example:
![]()
![]()
^ In GT2 they were significant (MX-5) Roadsters made by its tuning arm Mazdaspeed:
A-Spec
![]()
^ Took me forever to look for a decent pic...
B-Spec
![]()
C-Spec
![]()
^ Of course these cars can be lodged in as a separate marque from Mazda...
Eye Candy -> Almost everyone here in GTP liked [R]acing Modifications from GT1 & GT2, well heres a treat for you. Got it from the other thread:
Favorite [R]acing Modification in GT2
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It's not bad at all actually.That is still not a great balance is it? Basically 50% Japan, 50% ROW. A balance would be roughly 33% Asian & Australasian, 33% European and 33% American.
-> One thing that I would like to point out that I forgot to mention is this symbol:
[R]
^ This highlight means that the car is a race-spec vehicle or a race-modified car. This designation only applied in GT1 and GT2.![]()
Better than your percentages. 33% American would be way too high. Outside of the Corvette, Viper, Camaro, Mustang and a selection of the better muscle cars, it's slim picking for suitable american cars.
.
^ Can you please post a link thru my PM, I'm just curious and would like to see it.It's not bad at all actually.
Better than your percentages. 33% American would be way too high. Outside of the Corvette, Viper, Camaro, Mustang and a selection of the better muscle cars, it's slim picking for suitable american cars.
I made a fantasy list of cars for GT6 of 650 cars, included all the essentials and tried to be objective but at the same time trying to think a little like PD does. I though I came up with a good balance. It ended up being 43.4% European cars, 42.5% Japanese cars, 10.6% American cars, 0.8% Korean cars, 0.6% Australian cars and 1.7% Gran Turismo cars (X1s, formula cars and karts). That's the sort of percentages PD should be striving for.