- 4,517
- Vancouver, BC
My only complaint is that they didn't include the 60's version.
Nice post, I enjoyed reading it and I agree entirely.History is one reason Spa is so special. The track has been around in some form or another for almost 100 years. Wiki Spa-Francorchamps. It'll give you a bit of history about the place.
If you Google Earth Spa-Francorchamps, you can see where the old 14 Km course took a left down the hill at Les Combes and wound through the Belgian country side till it met back up with the what is now Turn 16 on the current course. All the stories I've ever seen or read from drivers that had driven the old course say it was super dangerous and quite a challenge. The modern circuit (7 Km circuit) came about in 1979.
It would be awesome if PD put the old Spa circuit in GT5!
I also think Spa is great because it's a naturally challenging course that doesn't feel like its trying too hard to be challenging. A lot of modern race tracks are being designed on computers to incorporate tricky triple and quadruple apex turns and man made elevation changes all in attempt to give drivers the same challenge as places like Spa and the Nordschlife... two tracks nestled in the Eiffel Mountains that were built many decades ago, without computers and just followed the natural lay of the land. That natural lay of the land is what makes a track like Spa so challenging for drivers and so fun for spectators.
Heck, even Monza is a challenge. Yes it's pretty flat and somewhat of a short circuit but with challenging turns like the two Lesmos, Ascari and Parabolica, it makes for a challenging lap.
What I'm getting at is, the old tracks from back in the day didn't shove a bunch of chicanes and multiple apex turns down drivers throats just to challenge them and their cars. Those same tracks from back then are the tracks most people want to see modern racing on in this day and age.
In GT5, Spa joins a long line of tracks that have a natural flow about them. Even the original tracks of the GT series are designed in such a manner to give you the sense of a race track laid on a piece of land that has nice elevation changes and turns that follow the natural lay of the land. There isn't any real "artificial" feeling course in GT5.
To draw a comparison, play F1 2010 or 2011 and drive on some of the modern F1 tracks. Bahrain, China, Malaysia, Turkey, Singapore and Abu Dhabi are courses that come to mind. Those tracks are the ones that are designed by one architect (Hermann Tilke) and he tries to incorporate weird turns and man made elevation changes into his track designs. Those tracks feel artificial. They end up just not having the same "it" factor as the older more historic racetracks. Gratuitous use of multiple apex turns and awful chicanes is what's the disappointment about some of these modern tracks.
Enjoy Spa in GT5. It really is a well done piece of work by PD.
Mac KNothing at all..
Someone please 'shoop the GT5 HUD onto this gif.
It's part of the holy trinity of F1.
Senna, Spa and a V12.
Nothing at all..
![]()
I also think Spa is great because it's a naturally challenging course that doesn't feel like its trying too hard to be challenging. A lot of modern race tracks are being designed on computers to incorporate tricky triple and quadruple apex turns and man made elevation changes all in attempt to give drivers the same challenge as places like Spa and the Nordschlife... two tracks nestled in the Eiffel Mountains that were built many decades ago, without computers and just followed the natural lay of the land. That natural lay of the land is what makes a track like Spa so challenging for drivers and so fun for spectators.
LOhohohohoooooL Keep watching Nascar dude. On the ovals you'll find no chicanes the "KILLS" the course for you. Remember the car is heavy.Glad I'm not the only one who doesn't see what the big deal is. I get the history, and that's cool, and I know a lot of the members here ride F1's nuts so hard they wish GT was "The Real F1 Simulator", but really?
Granted, I've only done a few laps on it so far...and a large part of the course is fun, but that one super-ridiculous-I-might-as-well-just-get-out-and-walk-low-speed chicane absolutely KILLS the course for me. Yes, the course is tough, I'd say the most difficult course in the game due to the low-speed corners and undulation, but extreme difficulty does not automatically equal extreme fun.
I'm reminded of the DanceDanceRevolution scene, where so many people put stupidly-hard, muscially-empty, no fun songs like the Max series on a pedestal, just because of the difficulty.
Looking at some of the maps of previous layouts, I can certainly say some of the historic versions would have been awesome...but this just doesn't do it for me. Most people who bought the Complete Pack look at is as paying for cars and tracks and the suits and paints are free; for me, I wanted the cars and paints, and the suits and tracks only cost me $2 more.
Nothing. The reason why everyone here is so "OMFG SPA the best track EVER THANK YOU PD I LOVE YOU" is because it's SOMETHING and something is better than nothing. Particularly after the disappointing DLC, Spa looks like a king's banquet lol.
It's part of the holy trinity of F1.
Senna, Spa and a V12.