- 640
- Northampton
- C-Falcon89
I like my car to have a bit of oversteer, cannot stand understeer as I don't like it. It has been difficult to get use to though.
My style is very much RR/MR oriented and I suppose "loose" is the way to put it. But not in the "exhibition-style-drifting" sense of loose. In the classic sense of the word where the rear of the car swings around a turn gently due to the pendulum effect. I'm not much good in FF or AWD cars because they tend to understeer to much for my tastes. Some FR cars work for me also, especially ones where the engine is set far back (E-type). I pretty much like any car that's extremely nimble, even if that makes it twitchy and difficult. Yellowbird, BTR, Alpines, Lancia Stratos, Ferrari 512, etc. etc. Generally I despise understeer and expect a car to rotate aggressively when I lift off the throttle, so I much prefer cars with the engine as far-back as possible, especially the older one's which are far less tame than the modern variety. I prefer cars that steer as much with the throttle as they do with the steering wheel and where I really have to master the weight-balance and weight-shifting to drive the car well. It's difficult, but rewarding. This is my real-life driving preference as well.
I'm an aggresive driver, if that helps, I like late breaking and using my opponents as makeshift brakes![]()
I prefer my cars to lean towards understeer, not a drifter at all and don't like the rear end to step out on me. I tend to take a wide line coming from way outside deep in the corner, brake hard and late, turn in sharp, late apex. Pretty much an FF driving style to get the car rotated as quickly as possible and get it straight as quick as possible so I can get back on throttle. This makes a lot of RWD cars challenging for me so I tune them towards understeer to make up for it. Generally, on FR cars, I give a generous amount of positive toe in the rear to keep it stable with a pinch of negative toe up front to help it turn in. It works for me.