What movies have you seen lately? Now with reviews!Movies 

  • Thread starter Thread starter scentedsoap
  • 8,477 comments
  • 661,966 views
Whoa, there's a name I haven't heard in a while. Franco Nero was for Italian made-for-TV movies what Gerard Depardieu was for French cinema, or Giancarlo Giannini for Italian, meaning he was in EVERYTHING. He did a lot of Westerns as well, but the most notable are the Django ones... I think he did two or three, though he's amazingly, still around.

EDIT: Just checked his IMDb entry... I thought he was much older. Shows he's been in movies for a very long time.
 
lol based on this review from 2010 I watched Sherlock Holmes. I agree with this review listed above. I remember when this movie came out and I thought it was gonna be awful since they had a high level actor and tossed lots of money at it. Usually when that happens they spend all the money on special effects and advertising rather than a good story. This movie however had a little of all that. The review above list the whole flash backs which the audience never saw. For the majority we did get to see everything in the flashbacks it is just impossible for us to add up in able to solve the mystery. I think they did this because it's a US movie and usually the US people don't understand anything so they are forced to just lay it out or them. Unlike the British versions of Sherlock Holmes. In the end it wasn't bad. I wish it was more mystery and less magic but if you watch it everything gets figured out so I can't really complain.

I think that was the method of storytelling really. I just finished watching A Game of Shadows and you can clearly tell that Guy Richie's approach to the second film was more in line with the short story The Final Problem than the first movie had any connection to any novel or short story.
 
Sanji Himura
I think that was the method of storytelling really. I just finished watching A Game of Shadows and you can clearly tell that Guy Richie's approach to the second film was more in line with the short story The Final Problem than the first movie had any connection to any novel or short story.

Ya that was the way they obviously planned on making it, but like the other guy said a good mystery movie lets the audience feel like the character. I want to be able to try and solve the case myself based on the facts that Sherlock finds. This movie was impossible to do that since he found things and didn't share with us.
 
d4LPq.jpg


Drugstore Cowboy (Gus Van Sant, 1989) -- A realistic road movie about a drug addict, his 'family', and their inevitable decline into crime, and eventual seeking of redemption. As Van Sant's first movie, I have to say it's not as deep as I thought it would be, yet it does dwell into considerable depth, yet it's outstanding feature is actually the non-judgemental portayal of people living on the fringe of society, with very vivid characters and memorable scenes that seem effortless for the characters, should this be a real-life scene. Despite being recreated in 1971, I think it's the first movie I've seen that doesn't reminisce the time, it makes no mention of Vietnam, Kent State or the flower power movement, but this is also because the characters probably wouldn't have anything to do with that either. The movie is also a recreation of the life of a man called James Fogle, the original drugstore cowboy, who at the time he wrote the story, had spent 35 of his 53 years in prison. A good movie, that has sustained the passage of time, yet remained wholly uninteresting for me and bored me for a while. 5.5/10
 
lufGw.jpg


Dead of Night (Alberto Cavalcanti, Charles Crichton, Basil Dearden, Robert Hamer, 1945) -- An architect seeking the possibility of some work at a country farmhouse, soon finds himself once again stuck in his recurring nightmare. Dreading the end of the dream that he knows is coming, he must first listen to all the assembled guests' own bizarre tales, and thus the movie becomes an anthology of horror stories that are very well done and actually pretty scary. Although the stories told by the guests are clichés by today's standards, they are good and interesting.

The genius and wonder of this movie is that it has influenced so many movie of the horror genre that it just becomes amazing, especially because it was the first movie that took a gamble at piecing several unconnected stories into one overall plot within the narrative that has them all working together. This little British movie sprouted so many other movies that you'd be amazed: Tales From The Crypt, Vault of Horror, The House That Dripped Blood, The Monster Club, Creepshow, Tales From the Darkside, just to name a few. A great classic of the horror/eerie genre. 8.5/10
 
I watches Donnie Darko and I have heard lots of people say how good it is but man is it weird. It's so weird I don't even know how to comment on it. The acting by Jake Jillinhall (sp?) was really good and the whole time travel story was cool, but I just don't get it. If you haven't seen it and you like good acting and weird plots than this movie is perfect for that. Was entertaining as well just odd. The song at the end I have heard many times before and it goes perfectly with this movie.
 
If you read a few post above I saw Sherlock Holmes so I figured I'd watch part 2. The movie is super long at a bit over 2hours. I do not think they needed it to be close to this long as it started very slow. After the first hour the movie picks up and becomes more intense and has more mystery. There is one part where they are all running in a forest and it has a lot of slow motion spots that were pretty cool. The ending was great as well. If you saw the first part you mine as well watch this one since it is basically a continuation and a bit more of everything. Decent movie over all, but for me with a guy like Sherlock Holmes I like the actual mystery movies better than these American editions that toss in crazy amounts of action and randomness.
 
TmScn.jpg


Crimes and Misdemeanors (Woody Allen, 1989) -- An opthamologist's mistress threatens to reveal their affair to his wife, while a married documentary filmmaker is infatuated by another woman. Even though you don't necessarily have to be a Woody Allen fan to enjoy this movie, as is often the case, I think if treated as 'any other movie' it just falls short of greatness; it does have a decent plot and works on a highly controversial and interesting premis: is there a pefect crime? Is guilt the same as remorse? But that aside, the movie remained a tad uninteresting for me in many ways, despite having some memorable scenes and some very funny moments that I remembered even from watching it when it first came out. The movie asks some serious and controversial questions, yet it just didn't make it interesting enough for me because it focused too much on that while leaving the comedy part (Allen's greatest strength, making serious subjects funny) out. 7/10
 
JPYx0.jpg


From Here to Eternity (Fred Zinnemann, 1953) -- In 1941 Hawaii, a private is cruelly punished for not boxing on his unit's team, while his captain's wife and second in command are falling in love. As it often happens with different movies made showing the same historical event, it gets compared to other movies depicting Pearl Harbor, and this is really what they should've done with Michael Bay's version, since it really shows the soldier's side and the events that lead up to the eventual Japanese attack, but in a very well done manner.

The movie actually is two different stories that distantly interwine: the one of the sergeant who falls in love with his captain's wife, and the story of the private and his friend, sorting through all the army BS. The movie retains an amazing movie quality, still remainig crisp with the colors (both of them, ha!), coupled with great cinematography, music and direction. Acting is excellent from everyone, including Frank Sinatra, who actually got an Oscar for it (the movie got eight of them!) despite only showing true acting grit in a couple of scenes. 8/10.
 
Prometheus: I don't quite know what to say about this movie. It wasn't terrible, though, it was easily the worst film of the weekend. There were a lot of useless scenes, but it wasn't as bad as Aliens Resurrection. Prometheus is easily the best Alien movie since Aliens. The whole scene at the beginning with David watching Shaw's dreams...was useless and you KNEW it was useless when you saw it. You're just like, "And you're never going to bring that little bit up ever again in the entire movie, are ya? No...oh...wait...maybe...Wait, her father died in the jungle? I thought the mentioned her mother was dead in the dream. Why mention both her parents are dead in two completely different scenes that both require him to watch her dreams. If I were to keep one, I would've kept the latter one because they were in the middle of establishing David as a creepy robot, and that was a really creepy thing to say. "I watched your dreams, Elizabeth." Him doing it at the beginning...it's creepy, but pointless. Also...why is EVERYONE so fixated on Shaw? Why is she special? The movie hints that SHE'S the key to a lot but NEVER actually explains why. And...
her pregnancy...was also pretty pointless. I mean, I don't know what the point of it was, other than to make Shaw collapse in pain every twenty steps. But, maybe it was just the directors excuse to have a woman pregnant with a tentacle monster.

The creatures and the dangers of the planet seem...in consistent. First it's the dust storm, then something kills two people, then something else starts killing people...I mean...I think EVERYONE died from something entirely different. And Charlize gets killed in a pretty stupid way. You'd think that with all her hardassery, she'd know to RUN TO THE SIDE of the giant thing that's about to crush her. I mean Shaw falls and rolls out of the way like a champ, but Charlize...just sits there and dies. Really?

They did set it up for a sequel following Shaw on her journey through the universe...but...I don't know. It wasn't a terrible movie, but there were a lot things that were mentioned...and left unexplained. Like...if no one believed the scientists reasoning for going to the planet, 1. Why'd they all volunteer? 2. Why spend TRILLIONS of dollars on the stupid mission? 3. Why not run away at the first signs of danger? Because some dying fool wanted it? What's he gonna do if you say, no? Beat you with his cane? They never really explain any of those questions.

Or, what was with the cryo-tubes in the Life Boat? Who was in those and why weren't they revived at the beginning? I don't know. For all the pointless scenes in Snow White and the Huntsman, there seemed to be twice as many here. Still not a bad film, and I am becoming a fan of putting unknown actors in action films, but still...a 3/5. I'd wait for Netflix or Redbox to see this one.
Out of all the pointless scenes, you comment on the ones that actually relate to the story?
First off, Shaw's pregnancy is the result of David realizing the black goo has absolutely no effect on him, thus resulting in him indirectly infecting Holloway. The reason for Shaw's pregnancy is the creation of the Trilobite, which would normally be born similar to a Facehugger, except Shaw removed it prematurely (presumably so that her character would actually survive the movie).

Milburn was killed by the mutated worms & Fifield falls in the goo. Holloway asks to be killed. Fifield re-emerges & kills quite a few number of people. The Engineer alone killed 3-4 people & Janek, Ravel, & Chance are killed running the ship into the other. So, I'm not sure how the hell you came to the conclusion that everyone died from something different. :odd:

As for your questions, you answered #2 with your question, "Because some dying fool wanted it?" But, as FK said, that's how the Weyland Corp. worked & has always worked. They've been corrupt throughout the entire franchise.
 
McLaren
Out of all the pointless scenes, you comment on the ones that actually relate to the story?
* SPOILER *

For the Prometheus story that is pointless. For the background to the Alien series it is actually explaining part of the xenomorph life cycle.
 
Chronicle: 8/10

The special effects were decent and the story was pretty good too but there was something lacking. It seemed to have ended too quickly.
 
Last edited:
GCHAk.jpg


My Summer of Love (Pawel Pawlikowski, 2004) -- In the Yorkshire countryside, working-class tomboy Mona meets the exotic, pampered Tasmin. Over the summer season, the two young women discover they have much to teach one another, and much to explore together. Thus begins a tale of obsession and deception, shown through the struggle of love and faith in the countryside, showing the emotional and physical effects that bloom between two women that are complete opposites, yet manage to find a certain coolness, fascination, amusement and attraction in each other beyond their otherwise empty lives. This was a very moody and luscious movie driven by the characters alone, though there's also Paddy Considine in it, to stir things up a bit, adding a stronger touch of the whole self-deception issue. 7.5/10
 
Just finished watching The Amazing Spider Man.

7/10

I like the origin story better than the first Spider-Man, but they stretched it out a bit too much. The action scenes were good but I felt the ending was too rushed.

SPOILER ALERT:
Peter Parker is way more of a hipster now.
 
Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter


Well, what else can I say? :indiff:

4/10... uh... maybe 3.5/10 :lol: I'd give it 5 if it had a sense of humor.
 
Senna.

Clearly a 10:10. I actually shed a manly tear.
 
gilda+as+charged+01.jpg


Gilda (Charles Vidor, 1946) -- The sinister boss of a South American casino finds that his right-hand man Johnny and his sensuous new wife Gilda already know each other. Despite being a movie from the 40s, it's amazing the amount of sexual heat and tension in this movie. Even with this famous shot:

2289.jpg


The acting between Rita Hayworth and Glenn Ford, where they hate each other but are fatally attracted works great and her striptease interpretation towards the end really had me going. The storyline is very linear and brief, though quite effective, along with its witty script loaded with innuendos (awesome how it passed the censors). Amazing acting by everyone in it, especially the overlooked George Macready. 8/10

111894-ml-78248.jpg


Touching the Void (Kevin Macdonald, 2004) -- The true story of two climbers and their perilous journey up the west face of Siula Grande and down the north face, in the Peruvian Andes in 1985. Because it's a documentary, I won't bother warnign you about "plot" points, but the journey was perilous because the ascent had previously been attempted but never achieved, yet after the two climbers reached the peak, as they are descending, one of them breaks his leg. Despite what it means, the two continue, but when the injured hiker goes out over an overhang with no way of climbing back up, they separate and the injured climber falls into a crevasse. This is the story of how he got back down. It's a movie of people pitting against nature and coming out alive, at least. In the same sense as 127 Hours, but much more real because it's shown as a documentary and not a feature. The movie also deals with the moral and ethical laws of the decision of both hikers as to why they get separated and the will to go on. It's a great documentary that doesn't try to transmit an idea of right or wrong, it just shows the events. There are a couple of odd moments in the interviews, when a third person talks about who he preferred to survive, but I just didn't think much about it. 8.5/10
 
tmQ9U.jpg


Risky Business (Paul Brickman, 1983) -- A Chicago teenager is looking for fun at home while his parents are away, but the situation quickly gets out of hand. It's been a really long time since I last saw this movie, and I have to admit I didn't seem to recall much of it. I guess it's because I saw it more or less when it came out and since I was abuot 7 at the time, I guess I got sent out of the room during many scenes. Having seen it now, it's amazing I didn't get sent out during all of it.

The movie is much more interesting that one would think at first, especially because so many movies have come after it with more or less the same premise, yet remain in the purely comedic niche, while this one, although it has many comedy parts, it's also an interesting coming of age movie that turns out to have many moments of genius. The soundtrack by Tangerine Dream also made me like it from the start. Seeing it in 2012 makes me wonder just how much the makers were good at being precogs, with the world's apparent obsession at making money through any means necessary, be it legal or illegal. I'm sure the makers of it would be the first to say that the movie parodies the hollowness of the "American Dream", but too much of the time it feels like it celebrates them.

Still, you could watch this movie and say it's depressing and it probably is, especially because it paints a frighteningly accurate portrait of how superficial and narrow a world we are. There are no values taught in it, and that is the environment too many kids are subject to. The fact that it's taken almost 30 years to prove it just makes it all the more amazing. This movie gave us a glimpse of the beginning of an era that still endures, where the goal of every money-making scheme is "don't get caught". 8/10


yJ9on.jpg


Sergeant York (Howard Hawks, 1941) -- True story of a hillbilly sharpshooter drafted in WW1 despite his claim to be a pacifist, who ends up becoming a war hero. Gary Cooper gives a great portrayal of WWI hero Alvin York, someone from the back woods who is very much a fundamentalist, but never a phony; he represents the simple-living people trying to get through as best they can. The first half of the movie shows York in his hometwoen, from being a no-good drunkard, to finding God and everything that leads up to him enlisting. While in the army, he proves to be a great sharpshooter, though killing is not something he copes well with. Still, the actions he took in France seem to be the real deal, and cooper carries the acting role perfectly and with conviction. years later he said about thsi movie that thugh he couldn't enlist for WWII due to his age and an injury, this was his way of supporting 'merica, by painting the figure of a likeable, naive but intelligent, American hero. Still, not being American, I couldn't help but think it was too cheesy at times and it painted the figure of Tennessee as a bunch of inbred retards, which I didn't enjoy much either. 6/10
 
111894-ml-78248.jpg


Touching the Void (Kevin Macdonald, 2004) -- The true story of two climbers and their perilous journey up the west face of Siula Grande and down the north face, in the Peruvian Andes in 1985. Because it's a documentary, I won't bother warnign you about "plot" points, but the journey was perilous because the ascent had previously been attempted but never achieved, yet after the two climbers reached the peak, as they are descending, one of them breaks his leg. Despite what it means, the two continue, but when the injured hiker goes out over an overhang with no way of climbing back up, they separate and the injured climber falls into a crevasse. This is the story of how he got back down. It's a movie of people pitting against nature and coming out alive, at least. In the same sense as 127 Hours, but much more real because it's shown as a documentary and not a feature. The movie also deals with the moral and ethical laws of the decision of both hikers as to why they get separated and the will to go on. It's a great documentary that doesn't try to transmit an idea of right or wrong, it just shows the events. There are a couple of odd moments in the interviews, when a third person talks about who he preferred to survive, but I just didn't think much about it. 8.5/10

Touching the Void is great. It's not really a repeat movie, but it's an amazing story. All of you should watch it.
 
CsfMs.jpg


Taps (Harold becker, 1981) -- Military cadets take extreme measures to insure the future of their academy when its existence is threatened by local condo developers.The biggest kick one can get nowadays from this movie is seeing very young versions of Timothy Hutton, Sean Penn and Tom Cruise, these last two were relative unknowns, and the same could almost be said about Hutton, except he had received the Oscar the previous year, when he was an unknown. Still, it's a great and believable performance by everyone involved and one of those movies I always wanted to watch again.

The point of watching this movie 30 years later is that perhaps in '81 it was made to generate sympathy for traditions and honor in light of the current materialism of society, yet I watch the movie now and feel nothing but pity for the characters, perhaps because of their narrow-sightendness as seeing the bigger picture of life. In this case the consequences of their actions caused a downward spiral chain of events that took an uncontrollable life of their own. Yet it's still amazing how the years have changed my understanding and perspective of movies such as this one. 7.5/10

S2q6Q.jpg


Zatôichi (a.k.a. The Blind Swordsman: Zatoichi) (Takeshi Kitano, 2003) -- A blind masseur/swordsman comes to a town in control of warring gangs, and while bunking with a farming family, he meets two women with their own agenda.The story of a blind swordsman is very well known in Japanese movies, and Zatoichi itself is the perfect example; I was quite intrigued as to how Kitano would remake this classic, and the movie turned out to be very well done. Beautiful sceneries and amazing soundtrack bring it to life and the action sequences, despite the too-liquid animation for the blood, are greatly orchestrated. The greatest enemy of this movie is its plot, which remains too simplistic, but with many unexplained twists and turns in it, which make it a bt unsettling. There's also many flashbacks in the movie which were hard to determine if it was indeed a flashback or part of the "current" event. There's also a point of this movie being a somewhat musical event, and though at times it fitted greatly, moreso in the beginning scenes, towards the end it got a bit tedious, especially when the movie concluded and there was nothing else to tell, the ending seemed to never come because there was a 5-minute musical number playing along. In a movie with such a simplistic plot, which had already been dragging on for 2 hours, a musical number out of nowhere seemed, well, out of nowhere. 5.5/10


osTiy.jpg


Ne le dis à Personne (a.k.a. Tell No One) (Guillaume Canet, 2006) -- The pediatrician Alexandre Beck misses his beloved wife Margot Beck, who was brutally murdered eight years ago when he was the prime suspect. When two bodies are found near where the corpse of Margot was dumped, the police reopen the case and Alex becomes suspect again. The mystery increases when Alex receives an e-mail showing Margot older and alive. This is exactly how a thriller should be! Eught years after his wife is killed, he receives an email from her, showing her alive and well.

Running at 131 minutes, this is the sort of intricate and fast-paced movie I like, where even 10 minutes before teh end, despite so much having happened, you're not sure how it's going to end, and Guillaume Canet handles it excellently with a story that has you hooked from the beginning, and as the plot thickens more and more while the chatacter uncovers the truth, it gets much more interesting, making it breathtaking when it all opens. This movie had me at everything; a great script, well played cast (inclusing Kristin Scott Thomas), a strong and mesmerizing soundtrack, including Otis Redding, Jeff Buckley and U2, very stunning cinematography and the complexity of the subplots is enough to keep you further glued, yet not become too confusing or distracting. Definitely one of the most enjoyable and intelligent thrillers I've seen lately. 10/10
 
Raging Bull is a movie about a boxer in an Italian neibourghood who's trying to make it big. The movie stars Joe Pesci and Robert DeNiro as well as many other famous names plus Martin Scorsase (sp?) so you already know its gonna be good. It's all in black and white and I personally love black and white photography but just hate it in movies. I try so hard to pay attention but just can't. However this movie is definitely next level good. I was watching every second and couldn't look away. Robert DiNero plays the boxer and has quite a temper towards everyone in the movie especially his wife and brother. You can feel the hate and get scared at what he might do next. The movie is also 2hrs long and somehow they fit him as a young guy to a much older adult without making the story scattered or boring. Highly recommend this movie it's a true great film.
 
The Grey - A great movie, I thought...well...a MOSTLY great movie. There were a couple of WTF moments like how did the wolves get across the ravine so quickly? Also, I thought the wolves were supposed to be a bit more symbolic...and they were...kinda. To be honest, this movie is a mix between the Sinking of the Arizona, The Ghost and the Darkness with a smidge of Wolf's Rain mixed in. (
In fact, there's one scene in particular around the campfire in the woods that reminded me of a scene in Wolf's Rain.
.) There was one thing that makes me not give this movie a perfect score though, and that is it was a tad predictable...and it was a stupid kind of predictable. And it's a cliche kind of predictable. So, because of that, I'm giving this a 4/5.

Seriously, though, the wolves were actually pretty awesome, I thought, save that one stupid Wolf's Rain scene. Although, that was much cooler and made slightly more sense than the Snow White Princess Mononoke scene. As to the predictability...you knew Liam Niessen was gonna be the only survivor very early on...or at least the last survivor. You could see it from a mile away. I HATE it when the only big name actor is the last/only survivor. Red Planet did that, too, and that REALLY wasn't that bad of a movie...like this one. And doing that kinda BS just kills the whole flow of the movie. And you could tell who was gonna die next well before they died, which was also kinda stupid. There was no surprises. There were tense moments, but no surprises because of the crap ton of foreshadowing every three minutes. The best part was when they were around the camp fire in the woods. That entire segment kicked ass because it was tense, well written and had some kick ass moments and no one died. In fact, it was the one scene in the entire movie where they all laughed and enjoyed each other's company...until Liam killed the mood. Anyway, a great movie...stupid cliche predictability.
 
MV5BMTc4MzIxNTYwNl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNzE4MjE0NA@@._V1._SY317_CR0,0,214,317_.jpg


Hall Pass 👎👎

Terrible... just terrible. I did actually finish the movie because I was morbidly curious at how bad it actually was, and even with only 1% of the movie left to go, it still managed to reach new lows for stupidity.

I found this movie insulting on so many levels. The foundation of the comedy in this movie is to be as emasculating as possible. Prepare yourself for male humiliation throughout the movie. All men are the most pathetic, idiotic caricatures of men that you could possibly imagine. The women, on the otherhand, are generally portrayed as intelligent, thoughtful, and existing on a higher level.

Also, almost all nudity is male (full frontal), and is supposed to be funny due to homo-erotic situations with supposedly straight guys. So... basically... the already tired formula that all comedy movies seem to rely on these days.

The movie starts out by establishing these two sexually frustrated dudes who very badly want to be intimate with their wives but who's wives refuse them. Their wives then complain profusely when these guys are attracted other women and decide to teach them a lesson by giving them a "hall pass" to show them how pathetic they are (since obviously no one will be interested in them).

I'm not sure how this is supposed to benefit anyone. If these women think their husbands are completely unappealing to the opposite sex, this is a good thing? The goal here is to convince their husbands that they cannot have sex with anyone (including their wives), and thereby defeat them completely. And this is proposed as a reasonable and intelligent desire for wives to have.... WTH?

Only one person has sex in this movie (with an ancillary character)... one... and it's not someone who has a hall pass... and the experience is shameful and destructive.

In the end, the women are proved right and the guys come crawling back to their sexless relationships deciding that they were wrong to want to have sex in the first place. The movie effectively puts everyone right back at square one and pretends that the relationships are fixed and problems solved.

I can't recall a less healthy portrayal of marriage or sex.
 
A few that I have seen recently:

The Amazing Spider-man

As a general rule, I despise remakes, but for this one, because I have heard rumors that it is more faithful to the comics, I gave it a shot. I almost regret I did.
The villain of the film, The Lizard, really looked more like the source material Hobgoblin than anything else, and as best that I can recall, Norman Osborn never had an illness in the source material.

Still with all the rubbish that was mixed in the film, I did enjoy several performances, especially from the likes of Denis Leary, Martin Sheen and Rhys Ifans.

Andrew Garfield was the perfect choice to play the web-slinger. His brand of one liners flowed more naturally than Toby McGuire(sp), and it seems to be a perfect fit for the long haul of the Spider-man franchise.

Let's not forget Emma Stone. She captured the "girl next door" spirit in her performance as Gwen Stacy and Garfield and her has perfect chemistry on screen.

Now the bad news. Despite clocking in at a little over 2 hours, the film makers have apparently forgotten pacing. Uncle Ben was alive for about half the movie, and while it may be inconsequential to some, it bothered me to the point where I was asking, "when is he going to die?"

Another thing that bothered me was the fact that there was no JJ. Sure they didn't need him, but he was the comic relief in the first trilogy, and it would have been nice to have something other than Spider-man's one liners to lighten up a dark movie.

Overall, if you haven't seen it, you should, but I wouldn't go and pay the 3D up charge just to go see it.

Grade: B+
 
A few that I have seen recently:

The Amazing Spider-man

As a general rule, I despise remakes, but for this one, because I have heard rumors that it is more faithful to the comics, I gave it a shot. I almost regret I did.
The villain of the film, The Lizard, really looked more like the source material Hobgoblin than anything else, and as best that I can recall, Norman Osborn never had an illness in the source material.

Still with all the rubbish that was mixed in the film, I did enjoy several performances, especially from the likes of Denis Leary, Martin Sheen and Rhys Ifans.

Andrew Garfield was the perfect choice to play the web-slinger. His brand of one liners flowed more naturally than Toby McGuire(sp), and it seems to be a perfect fit for the long haul of the Spider-man franchise.

Let's not forget Emma Stone. She captured the "girl next door" spirit in her performance as Gwen Stacy and Garfield and her has perfect chemistry on screen.

Now the bad news. Despite clocking in at a little over 2 hours, the film makers have apparently forgotten pacing. Uncle Ben was alive for about half the movie, and while it may be inconsequential to some, it bothered me to the point where I was asking, "when is he going to die?"

Another thing that bothered me was the fact that there was no JJ. Sure they didn't need him, but he was the comic relief in the first trilogy, and it would have been nice to have something other than Spider-man's one liners to lighten up a dark movie.

Overall, if you haven't seen it, you should, but I wouldn't go and pay the 3D up charge just to go see it.

Grade: B+

Just got back from seeing this as well .

First thing is first it's a remake so you get Peter being bitten,Garfield falls for the very hot Emma Stone,Uncle Ben dies snd Spidey fights another green Monster.

It is long no doubt about it and there are some pretty weird scenes like
When Peter Parker first tests web swinging he does at it at the highest building Imaginable ,slow down crazy man ;)

The Lizard's CGI wasn't mind blowing to be honest but on the other hand although at the core both Spiderman movies are identical ,there are enough differences and I actually liked the 3D in this one to make it worth a view.

Oh another down was scenes and the Script were way too predictable for me.
 
K-Pax is a movie about a normal man who claims to be just visiting earth from another planet called K-Pax which is over 1000 light years away. I'm not into science fiction space movies too much but I have heard this movie is very good and not your typical sci fi movie. It starts off where the man randomly appears in a crowded train station however you don't know if he "beemed" there or just walked in the crowd. After some questioning they take him to a mental institution to further study him and ask him more question about this new mystery planet. Know matter what they ask he has a answer which makes sense and everyone is pretty stunned but still can not believe he's from outer space since that's impossible. The man says that on a certain soon at a certain time he will be traveling back to his planet and everyone is excited to see him do this. I don't wanna give any details away but from start to finish you will be wondering if he's a actual alien or not. The acting is great and there are no typical space ships and aliens which makes this movie really good. In my opinion this is a movie you must check out. Released only a few years ago and definitely one of the best recent films you can watch.
 
agqWB.jpg


À L'intérieur (a.k.a. Inside) (Alexandre Bustillo, Julien Maury, 2007) -- Coming from the more-or-less recent wave of extreme French horror, this movie is enthralling, punishing and, frankly, among the best in this new spur. The plot has been stripped down to the most simplistic type for maximum effect, tells of Sarah, a pregnant woman, who at the beginning of the film loses her husband and is herself injured in a serious car accident. Four months on and very near the end of her term, Sarah spends the night before giving birth alone at home. In the middle of the night the doorbell rings and a strange woman demands that Sarah let her in. So without giving too much away, let’s just say the stranger at the door makes her way into the house and Sarah must fight relentlessly to keep both herself and her unborn child alive.

Most of the movie takes place within Sarah's home, and given such simplistic setting, you could think the movie runs out of steam quickly, but the directors get a very eerie sense of claustrophobia going on and make the movie work much better than I thought possible. They also use many dark corners and dim lighting to maximum effectiveness in creating a terrifying atmosphere. The levels of violence used are insane and some moments are quite gory, but it's never over the top, despite them being among the goriest, yet visually stunning. Both performances are good and believable, vulnerable and even sadness-conveying.

The movie remains a demanding one, and when the final credits rolled I felt mentally tired at the different emotions the acting conveyed and the visual spectacle I had just experienced. Great and original movie, as long as you expect just what it is. 7.5/10
 
4O1rh.jpg


Amarcord (Federico Fellini, 1973) -- A year in the life of a small Italian coastal town in the 1930s, as is recalled by Fellini, in a style that combines the free form and make-believe splendor with the comic, bittersweet feeling for character and narrative typical of some of his best films of the 1950s. The symbolism and narrative show that there is something almost magical, larger-than-life about the town, its citizens and many of the things that happen to them.

Despite so many movies prtraying Italians as liudmouth, backwards and miserable, especially in the 1930s, when fascism was in full effect, and where moviemakers have taken their creative licenses at showing these horrible aspects of daily life, Fellini shows Italy as a loving and emotional place, where some people are as you'd expect, but where every one of those emotions is acted perfectly. Coupled with the spellbinding images of sunlight, fog, dark seas and almost every other imaginable climate change during the year, the movie shows that despite all the political mistakes Italy may have done in its history, the people still remained true. Amarcord is a kind of magic only the very best in cinema inspire within us. It's the magic that makes us remember. 9/10
 
Attack the Block

Just terrible. I was expecting a comedy for a start (Nick Frost + Shaun of the Dead / Hot Fuzz director) so when a gang a teenagers appear at the start of the film I'm hoping they don't last long. Of course they are the main characters aren't they. Struggled to understand them for most of the film (I guess that counts as good acting though?) and couldn't care less when any of them got killed. Main gripe was with "Sam" though, being mugged at the start by the gang (because that makes your characters likable) but helping them and getting along by the end.
Avoid.
 
Saw the Amazing Spider Man, thought us was going to be bad, but it was amazing!
 
Back