What movies have you seen lately? Now with reviews!Movies 

  • Thread starter Thread starter scentedsoap
  • 8,476 comments
  • 661,836 views
What movies you seen lately?

Ive seen

~The Lion the Witch and Wardrobe
~Harry Potter 4 (liked number 3 better)
~King Kong(was really cool):) 👍
and gonna watch cheaper by the dozen soon- anyone seen it? wats it like?

Just looked at the first post for some reason...

Best thread started by somebody with only 3 total posts?
 
TnCvi.jpg


Crna Macka, Beli Macor (a.k.a. Black Cat, White Cat) (Emir Kusturica, 1998) -- One of those obscure movies I like to watch every now and then, this is a Serbian movie about Matko, a small time hustler, living by the Danube with his 17 year old son Zare. After a failed business deal he owes money to the much more successful gangster Dadan. Dadan has a sister, Afrodita, that he desperately wants to see get married so they strike a deal: Zare is to marry her. But none of the two care much for an arranged marriage: Zare is in love with Ida, Afrodita is waiting for the man of her dreams.

There's so much going on at the same time in this movie that it's thanks to the great characters and the wonderful directing that it all makes sense and every new bit added to it is completely welcomed. The images of a very rural Serbia are impressive, mostly when you take into account this is (a ver backward region of) Europe. The music is one of the great values in this movie, to the point that it could almost be considered a musical, making it to me one of Kusturica's most complete and well made movies. Despite being a love story and in a style that could be cheesy at times, it's surrounded by an aura of dark humor and gangsters feuding, always looking to outwit each other.

Although the plot is intricate, it remains slightly unimportant, overshadowed by the amazing cinematography, the excellent soundtrack and the funny moments. 9/10


VrkeO.jpg


La Antena (a.k.a. The Aerial) (Esteban Sapir, 2007) -- Sort of a mix between movies by Fritz Lang with Tim Burton, La Antena tells the story of a city in which no one speaks because voices have been eliminated, so everyone communicates through the written word and subtitles, but it's mostly a silent movie with a heavy charge of social commentary, part homage to german expressionism and part allegory that sometimes seems too force-fed, but in other cases gets aways with it nicely. The movie also offers an interesting commentary on the way the media works in society and its effect on social voices, perception and opinion. More to the point, although it's a (mostly) silent movie, it's not so much the silence what's impactful, but more the loss of words to communicate and express thought that immediately follows. La Antena is a type of movie you don't see very often, but the meaning of it will remain with you for a long time. 8/10


g80hn.jpg


Superbad (Greg Mottola, 2007) -- This was definitely the movie to watch after the strength of the two previous ones, and especially because of its light-hearted humor and seemingly sophomoric nature that is actually covered with excellent script-writing that make it a very special teen movie full of elements that make people like me go back to my high school days and remember so many awkward moments. Michael Cera does a great job in this movie, but it's Jonah Hill who really takes the cake. The key to the movie is not to take it too seriously, especially because the movies doesn't seem to take society too seriously either. It's a light comedy with very awesome lines and charcaters you really root for and like. I really wanted these guys to do it with the girls in the end! 7.5/10
 
The Beach. This movie stars Leonardo Dicaprio as a young tourist bored of everyday life and looking for a true adventure. He travels to Thailand where he eventually stumbles upon a map to a island paradise unknown to the world. He decides this could be the big thing that he is looking for and sets off to find it. Along the way he meets some new people, but quickly finds out this new life isn't as good as he hoped.

I liked this movie. It's just different than what you would expect. It's not the greatest movie ever but it's entertaining and has a pretty good story. If you are looking to escape for a couple hours this movie will definitely help you do that.
 
So I tried watching Alfonso Cuarón's first feature film yesterday. Cuarón has directed a few good movies, such as Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, Y Tu Mamá También, Children of Men, among others. I just couldn't make it past the 35-minute mark; the movie is such a pathetic, cheesy comedy and intensely bad acted... I have to say I was expecting something around that, especially being a Mexican movie, but I just had to stop it. The movie is called Sólo con Tu Pareja, and that's about all the review I'll do about it.

I probably won't go as far as giving it a 0, but it deserves a 2.
 
FSjFp.jpg


Celda 211 (a.k.a. Cell 211) (Daniel Monzón, 2009) -- The story of two men on different sides of a prison riot; the inmate leading the rebellion and the young guard trapped in the revolt, who poses as a prisoner in a desperate attempt to survive the ordeal. A very good example of Sánish moviemaking that isn't Almodóvar, ins't a dumb comedy, and isn't about transvestites. Here's a movie with a very solid script, excellent acting and dealing with a harsh but delicate subject, not to mention the actual drama unfolding within the prison walls. The enromous amount of actors in it working in tandem really made it for me, but the stress throughout also had me glued to it. The screenwriter, Jorge Guerricaechevarría once more adapts a great work for the movie, making it a brilliant story about friendship, corruption, and codes that are more valuable and important than labels and uniforms. Still, there's a few bits that completely lost me and I think they have to do with the editing and making it believable was probably what suffered. It's also a very violent movie, not just physically, and at times I got lost between why a scene was so violent yet so emotional... it didn't balance that out. 7/10

k56X4.jpg


The Crazies (Breck Eisner, 2010) -- About the inhabitants of a small Iowa town suddenly plagued by insanity and then death after a mysterious toxin contaminates their water supply. Okay, I get it's a remake of a '70s classic, but they could've gone a bit farther explaining the whys about it, especially because it's not a zombie flick, yet it works a lot on the same level, because it's from the infection premise, making this remake nothing groundbreaking, but still entertaining. Fortunately, the director didn't rely solely on violence to incite fear, even cutting away from the most violent parts. The script could've used a little more work, since there are some holes in it and characters were either very thinly created, or just made some intensely irrational decisions. The Crazies does its original quite a bit more justice than many of the others remakes received as of late, but doesn't push any buttons either. 6/10

lVOCY.jpg


Den Brysomme Mannen (a.k.a. The Bothersome Man) (Jens Lien, 2006) -- Andreas arrives in a strange city with no memory of how he got there. He is presented with a job, an apartment - even a wife. But before long, Andreas notices that something is wrong. He makes an attempt to escape the city, but he discovers there's no way out. Then he meets Hugo, who has found a crack in a wall in his cellar, and beautiful music streams out from it. Maybe it leads to "the other side"? As far as Norwegian movies go, this one quite pushes the limits of normality, while on the one side it shows what we've come to believe is the Scandinavian way of life, on the other it shows that that isn't what normal, passionate people would look for. Still, I was impressed how the city looks so surreal and dystopic, and the actors playing such apathetic and emotionless roles really amazed me; The strong differences between Andreas and the others leads to very amusing situations as well. All in all, it's a very good movie with a confusing plot, but the great atmosphere makes up for it. 8/10
 
I watched the new Bourne movie tonight.

That movie was terrible. 2 hours and 20 minutes for nothing to get resolved. There was a chase through Manila for 30+ minutes that just sucks the fun out of the movie. It wasn't the fault of Jeremy Renner as the new "Bourne" (I honestly don't know the new character's name) though. Renner was good, but the movie was just so muddled and confusing. Not to mention about 40-50 minutes too long.
 
Nitro Circus 3D


I finally went and saw it last night mainly for fact I am huge fan of Pastrana, and watched some of his shows. This movie really has two different ideas going on which honestly doesn't make sense considering. It really isn't anything different than his shows, just more put things put together than the current length of them. The 3D sucked in my opinion because it didn't give the wow factor I was expecting. Overall, I say wait til it is rentable if you want to watch it. They needed to focus more on how it started off with just how close they are and their bond through out the years. It rated a 5/10 for me.

The sad part of it was I was the ONLY person watching it last night, period.
 
I watched the new Bourne movie tonight.

That movie was terrible. 2 hours and 20 minutes for nothing to get resolved. There was a chase through Manila for 30+ minutes that just sucks the fun out of the movie. It wasn't the fault of Jeremy Renner as the new "Bourne" (I honestly don't know the new character's name) though. Renner was good, but the movie was just so muddled and confusing. Not to mention about 40-50 minutes too long.

I thought that The Bourne Legacy could have been longer. I enjoyed the movie, but found the ending to be very lacklustre. I am annoyed that the movie is an introduction movie to a new character and nothing more.
 
Seen Batman.....Awesome movie..that is all

:D
 
kDjrJ.jpg


Nanjing! Nanjing! (a.k.a. City of Life and Death) (Chuan Lu, 2009) -- The movie is based on the little known and infamous atrocity known as the rape of Nanking, where during the Japanese takeover of China's then capital city that led to the deaths of an estimated 300,000 civilians as well as sexual assaults said to number in the tens of thousands, in December of 1937.

Still, the numbers, like words, are weak things, incapable of conveying the brutal horror of that situation or the ability of this movie to capture its dehumanizing essence, and make us feel, as one of "City's" agonized protagonists. The portrait of the unspeakable things that can happen when soldiers are let loose on a civilian population, the movie captures the sense of mind-warping chaos and pure bedlam that emerge when panic and terror rule the day. The result is a movie that is botth epic and intimate, thanks to its very convincing acting and large scale scenery. Emotions are intensified thanks to the use of hand-held cameras, making it almost seem as a documentary, and impossible to overstate how crushing the actual reality of the occurence actually was.

As hard as it was to watch, it's a necessary reminder of what we've allowed to happen in times of war, but also what we shouldn't be allowed to forget. Perhaps if we all had experiences like this one, we would work harder to see that they're never repeated. 9/10


N2egc.jpg


Gummo (Harmony Korinne, 1997) -- Set in a town called Xenia, in Ohio, the movie depicts a small, poor and boring town that never fully recovered after a tornado in the 1970s, where kids have nothing to do but kill time, buying glue to sniff and get high. The movie takes us through several different characters as they wander through their lives, being poor, filthy and some even demented.

Make no mistake, Gummo is a very bizarre movie, a mix of "home footage", live action and people talking directly to the camera. There really is no plot, but you just get to witness these people's miserable existence. In addition to that, there is a fair amount of depravity and disturbing behavior that I couldn't enjoy. I think the "point" of the movie is to show a side of America that is quite uncomfortable, or at least attempts to create that discomfort, though after a while, it just ended up bothering me. For example, these multiple shooting methods got on my nerves, as did some character's inability to act, whereas some scenes were clearly improvised, but the improv had died and then some awkwardness ensued.

Harmony Korine also wrote Kids, and that was a fine film and quite shocking in its glimpse at the actual world teens live in. I think Gummo could've worked better if it adhered to the same formula as Kids. I have no problem with directors doing what they did here, I just think it didn't work out for this movie; the story is very relevant, but it was boring in some odd scene transitions and some sloppy work (which I think was the actual point of it). It's a decent attempt to tell an interesting story, but it falls just short of the mark. 5.5/10



INs2t.jpg


Immortals (Tarsem Singh, 2011) -- Theseus is a mortal man chosen by Zeus to lead the fight against the ruthless King Hyperion, who is on a rampage across Greece to obtain a weapon that can destroy humanity. One of the bigger issues when putting onthe poster that it's "from the producers of 300", is that because of its gladiatorial, ultra-violent nature, it'll inevitably get compared ot it. Yet, this is a more expansive movie that embraces mythology while abandoning historical fidelity, replacing it instead with blood, grotesque and slow motion.

Although it may be Tarsem's most coherent (and commercial) movie, the tale of Theseus fighting an amazingly evil Mickey Rourke makes sense (as oppose to The Cell, which doesn't). The movie also is visually stunning, despite having been made with so much CGI that it seemed unreal, yet believable, also thanks to the nicely designed costumes. Unfortunately, the plot feels scissored up and patched back together, in a sense that will leave you wanting a bit more of information, but will also bore you due to the slowness of the non-action scenes.

While it certainly is a departure from Tarsem's usual style, it probably won't fare well with his fans, but it has enough guts, blood and glamour to satisfy the average pop-corn dosed movie goer. 5/10
 
Dude, it's Tom Servo. He's trapped in outerspace with a few other robots and some human guy and they're forced to watch crappy movies. They can't control where the movies begin or end because Joel used the parts to built him and his robot friends.
I put that person on my ignore list many years ago. I think 8 years ago when I got here. :lol:


MV5BMTc2MTU4ODI5MF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwODI2MzAyOA@@._V1._SY317_CR7,0,214,317_.jpg

Since Total Recall 2012 just came out, I decided to re-watch the original. Its actually a lot better than I remember especially for being a 1990 movie. I heard the new one isnt that good but will probably rent it when it comes to dvd so I can compare the 2.
 
Last edited:
Gummo ...

Ha Ha! I remember watching this movie in the theater when it came out because it was set in Ohio. Yeah, over-the-top in its story details and production. Watched it once, good enough, but not worth a 2nd viewing. Didn't realize it was written by the Kids person (that's a movie I turned off after 10 minutes and have never come back to.)

Oh, and silly Camaroboy. But whatever, people are allowed to be different. In my opinion Tom Servo is one of the most valuable contributors to GTP.
 
I put that person on my ignore list many years ago. I think 8 years ago when I got here. :lol:

Awwww :(

I remember the incident, and still think you're sick for suggesting it.
 
The Bourne Legacy - Honestly, this movie is either a great movie or a really bad movie depending on if you've seen the previous movies or not. If you have seen the other three Bourne movies, it's a great movie and blends in with the previous ones well and Jeremy Renner is great...but...if you haven't seen the previous Bourne movies you will have absolutely no idea what's going on as half the movie is talking about the events in the other movies and those events are effecting Jeremy's character. There's no explanation of who Bourne is/was. There's no good explanation of the events that happened in the previous movies...and..to be honest, it's basically the first movie all over again with a different character but more confusing. So, if you've seen the other movies I'd give it a 5/5. If not, well, I'd probably give it a 2 out of 5 or a 3 if I was being generous.

From an author's standpoint, you always want to pretend your readers have never read the previous books in a series. Same thing goes for movies: pretend that no one has seen the previous movies. Then, the people have actually haven't, aren't confused. Because of this little faux pas, I'm actually giving this movie a 4 out of 5. Because I don't like the idea that I could have seen this movie and been completely lost by the end.
 
Battleship
MV5BMjI5NTM5MDA2N15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNjkwMzQxNw@@._V1._SY317_.jpg

This was a decent movie. Some very poor acting but the special effects were pretty good. I give it a 6/10.
 
Last edited:
Starship Troopers: Invasion: I can fully agree with going with the CGI path...but even with that...it's pretty poor. You know a movie's bad when it has to resort to female nudity within the first few moments of the movie. And what's even more stupid...there was at least one scene where they did their best to hide the nudity despite having just shown some in the previous scene...and then showing more in the following scene...so...yeah...whatever. The acting was bad, the story was terrible. The idea was good, but...It's a Starship Troopers movie. So...3/5. With an extra star rewarded for the needless nudity.


The Hunger Games: Not many people are going to like this review, but...This really isn't that great of a movie. The book itself is slow moving, and the movie, since it was written and co-produced by the author, kinda expects you to have read the book because there are some things that they leave out that are kinda important. Like...why was the electric fence not electrified? What does she mean by "put your name in more times?"

Some of the special effects and sets also looked REALLY fake. Especially the scene where they enter the main hall on flames. Nothing there looked real, it looked like cheap special effects on a cheap set. It just didn't work. Nor did the futuristic guards in the 18th-century looking districts. The contrast was just...too much.

And then there was the most WTF pan I've ever seen? When Katniss first enters the forest "arena" (BTW, a good way to save money on a set is to..well...not build one, and instead shoot the entire movie in a forest.) The pan goes from what looks like pavement to bright light to forest...what? Did the film just cross a road or something? What was the point of that shot? Was it Katniss' view coming up in the tube? If so, why they show her in third person following the bright light? This wasn't the only stupidly pointless scene (like, if it's a PG-13 movie, why'd you show Katniss scrubbing herself off in the bath and the dress on the bed? I mean, her mum tells her she had something laid out for her. They could've skipped to Katniss in the dress from there and would've lost nothing. Then again, that fits the feel of the book with the over explanations of everything.)

Also....who puts a land mine underneath ALL their food? That's just stupid because if your trap is tripped, you lose ALL you food, don't you? That doesn't make any sense. Anybody with a brain would know not to use ALL the food for that trap. 1 crate would work fine...heck the bag of apples would've worked fine.

And...wouldn't changing the rules when they did and how they did make it quite obvious since they were the last remaining full district at the time? Or were they? Maybe District 2 still had both it's people, but I don't think so. I kinda want to watch it again and keep track of who dies from each of the districts, because it seems to me like they goofed there and when there were 4 helpful bags and then 3 people die and yet there's still 3 people left? I think I missed something there.

I also feel the movie would've been better with an R-Rating and more gore. That's just me, though. But...really, it kinda doesn't make any sense to have a movie about a fight to the death and not show the gruesomeness of that...especially since the crowd in that universe would see all the gore. Because...well..that's the point of having fights to the death publicly televised: to strike fear into the people while entertaining them at the same time.

You can tell it was written by woman, though. Because it's a drama with a strange love triangle with a smidgen of action sprinkled on top to make it "appeal" to the guys. And really...I don't think it works. Because the genres don't really...mesh. I mean, it's like: Action - pause - romance - pause - drama -pause...it's like it's trying to give each genre an equal amount of screen time without them blending together.

However, the movie isn't terrible. The action is good, some of the scenes are pretty funny and it's a pretty clever story really. It's just...the futuristic sets don't feel futuristic...they feel stereotypical. Everything's all round and smooth...it's like a twisted version of the Jetson's. And the crowds...it's like someone threw up a birthday party.

Woody Harrelson and Lenny Kravitz were the best parts of the film. Woody, of course, is a great actor and his character and Lenny's seemed more interesting than any of the other characters.

Anyway, Hunger Games gets a 3/5 from me, as well.
 
LNfwm.jpg


Evolusi: KL Drift (Syamsul Yusof, 2008) -- Malaysia's attempt to gte in on the drifting movie bandwagon is actually quite decent. It's plagued with bad acting, impossible feats and a paper-thin plot, just like the other drifting/tuning movies that have sprouted since Fast&Furious. Seeing this movie with subtitles is absolutely necessary, though I'm sure there's some very bad dubbed version, seeing as Malaysian apparently has a lot fo slang words in English, but it was still funny to hear them talking in a style that would make Kimi Raikkonen jealous.

Onto the really important parts: the drifting is good, the driving is very good, and the action isn't too over the top, yet everything else manages to be very annoying to say the least. The editing is probably my biggest problem withit, since it made the characters look wooden and for some very awkward moments. Any attempts at drama are half-baked and predictable, but one thing I have to give this movie props for is that there is no formulaic happy ending. We never truly find out what happens in the end and a lot of questions are left unanswered, which most probably is to lead to a sequel, but also meant that all the stupid scenes could be erased from my memory. Hopefully this will be a breakout movie for many of the ones in it, but stand alone, it's not much worth it. 4/10

BCb1o.jpg


Le Cercle Rouge (a.k.a. The Red Circle) (Jean-Pierre Melville, 1970) -- Okay, where does this "John Woo presents..." bit come from? This movie is about his age! Anyway, ignoring that part, this is a movie about an aristocratic thief, released from prison on the same day that a murderer, escapes from the custody of the police. What comes then is a very complicated but worthy plot of murder, deceit and some decent action scenes, with some very solid actors, including Alain Delon and Yves Montand. I have to say Melville is one of those directors you have to be quite patient to appreciate, since his movies tend to be very slow and with a lot of unspoken messages and silent scenes. This one is no exception, to the point that for the most part, you could watch it with the sound off and not miss too much, except for the awesome jazzy soundtrack. Also great is the color cinematography, with quite strong imagery.

In the end, an absorbing and cool story with four great performances are what make this movie, and certainly not a movie to be missed if you're a fan of French new-wave cinema, or a crime movie buff, even with the 140-minte clock time. 7/10


q4qxk.jpg


Le Casse (a.k.a. The Burglars) (Henri Verneuil, 1971) -- Brilliant acting, good, classic plot, fantastic score by Ennio Morricone, a car chase coordinated by Remy Julienne (making it one of the best ever) and some excellent roles by Jean-Paul Belmondo and Omar Sharif, fighting each other with skills, brains, guts and muscles. They don't make breathtaking suspense like this anymore.

It's funny how car chases became such important part of ganster/crime movies for a long time. Here's one between a Fiat 124 and an Opel Rekord, down busy streets, up and down steps, in fields and all around Athens. As expected, it really has no real bearing to the story, but it's an amazing chase and was defintely the reason I watched the movie. The rest of the movie is fun, if a tad too slow for its own good and the female role is quite objectified. 6/10


QKlIF.jpg


Man on a Ledge (Asger Leth, 2012) -- As a police psychologist works to talk down an ex-con who is threatening to jump from a Manhattan hotel rooftop, the biggest diamond heist ever committed is in motion. This movie has a 6.6 on IMDb, and sometimes I'm amazed at the generosity of humankind, but in this day and age when so many people are out of a job and scrambling to make money, I'm stupefied somebody actually funded, created and distributed this movie, arguably in a charitable movie towards the actors in it, because they definitely didn't have the movie-watchers sanity in mind.

I'm not going to talk about the plot, because honestly, the director didn't either. Acting was 2-dimensional, robber's 'expertise' was paint-by-numbers and the believeability of most scenes just made me want to turn it off, not to mention it was insanely slow and boring, until the almost-ending, when the guy jumps 22 floors to the ground, and then proceeds to tackle the bad guy--no kidding. For a while it made me wish I was the one on the ledge. 3/10
 
The Expendables 2

Starring(not in Billing order): Sylvester Stallone, Jet Li, Chris Hemsworth, Jason Statham, Dolph Lungren, Chuck Norris, Terry Crews, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Bruce Willis, Nan Yu and Arnold Schwarzenegger

Directed By: Simon West

About the Film

The magic of the first Expendables film has led to a nifty $275 million gross for Lionsgate, so they instantly greenlit a second film to "strike while the iron is hot". Insert more 80's action stars than ever before(Norris, Van Damme) and more cliches than ever before.

The Plot(contains spoilers)

Barney Ross(Stallone) leads The Expendables, a merc group that would do any thing for money, but right now, they have a problem with Mr Church(Willis). Church, since the first film has been keeping Stallone out of trouble with the CIA knowing that one day he would need the team. That time emerges as an airplane containing a safe crashes in Albania. Church needs the team to retrieve the contents of the safe, but unknowingly, the plane was being watched by a group known as the Sangs and their leader, Vilan(Van Damme). Holding the Expendable's sniper, Billy(Hemsworth), hostage, the team was forced to give up the contents of the safe, but Van Damme kills the hostage anyways.

Vowing revenge, Stallone tracks down the group to an abandoned mine where they kill most of the members of the Sangs, but Van Damme had already left with the mine's contents, five tons of weapons grade plutonium, intending for it to be sold to the world's terrorists. After Stallone and the gang go to the airport, cue the epic gun fight.

What Works

Some of the 80's cliches do actually work within the flow of the film. I won't go into specifics without spoiling them, the point of the cliches is to remember who the actor was best known for. Norris' character, Lone Wolf, was actually based on a movie he did in the late 70's.

Best Scene
There are two of them actually:

One of them involves a shootout where The Expendables are low on ammo and Stallone was the only one with a bullet. He takes a shot, and suddenly the men are killed and the tank was destroyed, all apparently by one man(Norris). Crews then points out that he was bitten by a king cobra and was in pain for five days, and Norris finishes with "then the cobra died." Obvious Chuck Norris joke, but it fits somehow.

Another is during the final sequences where Willis and Schwarzenegger were in a gun fight with Vilan's men. Schwarzenegger goes, "I'll be back," but Willis goes in his place. Schwarzenegger then goes "Yippie Kie Yea"(Obvious Die Hard reference).

What Doesn't Work

Despite the fact that I wish that Segal would have been in the film, his inclusion would have added more to the film, especially with his interaction with Van Damme.

The 80's Cliches may work in some cases, but in some scenes, they take away from the impact of the film.

The gore, compared to the first one, was ramped up.

Summing up

The film was a tribute to the 80's, but compared to the first film, it overdid it to an extreme level. This is definitely a man's movie all the way.

Grade:C+

C+ Good enough to buy after rental, or in Texan, kicking the tires before you buy.
 
^^ seen it today and I agree with the above ,It is just a fun action packed ride that I enjoyed immensly some pretty Epic scenes (for the half minded action child within all of us)lets face it this movie won't win Oscars or globes but you shouldn't go watch it because of that ,you should because it is a fitting tribute to the movies we or I anyway grew up watching .It's a badass movie and one that I loved seeing 8/10 for me yes not higher it isn't the most sophisticated movie you'll see and there isn't much in the plot ,even the back stories weren't interesting you just sat down wanting them to blow 🤬 up and keep on doing it.
 
Sanji Himura
The Expendables 2

Starring(not in Billing order): Sylvester Stallone, Jet Li, Chris Hemsworth, Jason Statham, Dolph Lungren, Chuck Norris, Terry Crews, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Bruce Willis, Nan Yu and Arnold Schwarzenegger

Directed By: Simon West

About the Film

The magic of the first Expendables film has led to a nifty $275 million gross for Lionsgate, so they instantly greenlit a second film to "strike while the iron is hot". Insert more 80's action stars than ever before(Norris, Van Damme) and more cliches than ever before.

The Plot(contains spoilers)

* SPOILER *

What Works

Some of the 80's cliches do actually work within the flow of the film. I won't go into specifics without spoiling them, the point of the cliches is to remember who the actor was best known for. Norris' character, Lone Wolf, was actually based on a movie he did in the late 70's.

Best Scene
* SPOILER *

What Doesn't Work

Despite the fact that I wish that Segal would have been in the film, his inclusion would have added more to the film, especially with his interaction with Van Damme.

The 80's Cliches may work in some cases, but in some scenes, they take away from the impact of the film.

The gore, compared to the first one, was ramped up.

Summing up

The film was a tribute to the 80's, but compared to the first film, it overdid it to an extreme level. This is definitely a man's movie all the way.

Grade:C+

C+ Good enough to buy after rental, or in Texan, kicking the tires before you buy.

I saw this as well and felt the same exact same way. It was funny hearing them say what they did in the past in kind of a joke way but sometimes got out of hand. Like Arnold says "I'll be back" like 5 times. It's fun tho which was basically the point of the movie so can't hate on it really.
 
I know. The last time it was said, Willis said it actually, it became kind of annoying. So it worked, but it backfired.
 
Safe: This is almost as ridiculous as Crank, but better, as the action scenes are better and it's far more entertaining, but it's still pretty stupid at times. Like when the Triads hold up the lobby of the hotel Jason and the kid are staying at...like...So, to catch the people you're looking for...you point a gun at the receptionist and shoot the security guard? My only question is how did they still get the little girl? Seriously, that shouldn't have worked. And then, the Hyundai stands out and get shot up, but the Mercedes GL doesn't? What?

In the end, this is an action movie that kinda-tries to be serious, but not all that hard as there are a lot of just stupid and silly points. So...it's kinda like The Transporter meets Crank. So...it's good...but not good. It gets a 3/5.
 
Tom Servo
Kramer vs. Kramer (Robert Benton, 1979) -- Ted Kramer is a career man for whom his work comes before his family. His wife Joanna cannot take this anymore, so she decides to leave him. Ted is now faced with the tasks of housekeeping and taking care of himself and their young son Billy. When he has learned to adjust his life to these new responsibilities, Joanna resurfaces and wants Billy back. Ted, however, refuses to give him up, so they go to court to fight for the custody of their son. One thing that called my attention to this movie when watching it is that Dustin Hoffman's character works in advertising and since I've worked in advertising for about 17 years, I know what he was doing, and I also know that this work demands a lot of your personal time and there's endless deadlines. Probably the main reason why 85% of the people I've worked with are either single, divorced, separated, estranged and whatever alternate marital status which leads someone to not be with someone else.

Having gotten that out of the way, I think it's an unforgettable movie (seen it for the 3rd time), even if it's not the most popular one and maybe one of the weakest in terms of Best Picture Oscar winners. Still, the movie is well done, has extraordinary performances and the kid actually gets an Oscar nomination! Kramer vs. Kramer is not one of the greatest films and is not a perfect 10, but it succeeds in making the film worth watching and worth caring about it. Certainly, one of Hoffman's best. I guess I identified in many ways with it because my parents also divorced when I was a kid and I probably did a lot of the stuff the child does. So, it's a great movie for me because I've identified with the situations, but I wonder if it's so great for everyone else? (IMDb gives it 7.7 so maybe it is). 9/10

Watched this movie based on this review. I heard of it before but that was pretty much it. The whole movie is very "slow" but the acting is so good you are really focused on what will happen. I agree it is really good I think the only reason it loses some points is because nothing really crazy or some big twist happens etc. Not to say its predictable and boring just mainly talking. Like I said before the acting is amazing and the kid in the movie does a great job. Glad I watched it.
 
Anyone else notice that, after doing some of these reviews, you notice more while watching movies? I mean, I might not have noticed just how crappy some of the sets in The Hunger Games were if I hadn't been doing these reviews. It's like your brain is able to analyze things more.
 
It's like when you buy a vehicle and then realize just how many there are on the road that you never noticed before.

You're looking for things now instead of simply watching.
 
tait
Adaptation for the millionth time. This movie is brilliant; smarter than 90% of everything else out there. It might take a few tries to understand what is going on but when you do it all comes together. Cage is an amazing actor and plays two completely opposite twins perfectly (one being a depressive, self-loathing character and the other a foolish go-getter). I love the way the Charlie (the go-getter) is a representation of basically 'bad' art and the mindset's behind it. You can read the wikipedia page, although it contains spoilers, will help you to better understand and appreciate the movie. 9.5/10

lol got this review back from 2008. It was between this or some movie I could not pronounce that Tom Servo gave a 9.5 as well back in '08. Had to go with this one just in case the other was a foreign movie since I hate reading subtitles.

This movie is so strange. It's like two movies in one going on at the same time than by the end you realize it's completely different from what you started with. I think I get it and yet feel I don't know a thing about it. May have to watch it a few more times like the review suggest. I definitely have to research more about it since it says it's based on a book but I can't tell what is true and what isn't. Doesn't help that I haven't read the book. If you like movies that take you out of your own world and put you into the characters lives than you really should see this movie. So many things running through my head about it I can't even find the words.
 
MsWlo.jpg


Antikörper (a.k.a. Antibodies) (Christian Alvart, 2005) -- Long wanted serial killer Gabriel Engel gets arrested in a spectacular police strike, while small town cop Michael Martens travels to the big city to interrogate him and find out if who's responsible for a murder in his town. This is a brilliant German crime drama that tackles issues such as the darkness of deep recesses of the human soul, the entrapment of fundamentalist religion, repressed sexuality and so much more, yet remains active in pace and suspense.

The good thing about this movie is that it doesn't try to portray the killer as a nice guy, it just focuses on making him into the monster he is, focusing on the mind of such a person, and then reflects on ti vs. the teachings of Catholicism and repressed sexuality, and then it just plays with the mind of the viewer. It's an intellectual movie that makes you think about the social issues that make serial killers, while scaring the crap out of you. At a certain point it just became too weird and hard to follow, and the end, while surprising, wasn't all that. 7/10


xKbr9.jpg


Poltergay (Eric Lavaine, 2006) -- Just another French comedy. Like it so often happens with Italian, Spanish and French moviemaking, they tend to rely on stupidity very often to make comedies, and while it isn't a very smart type of movie, it has seemed to work well in the past. So despite how smart some movies are, there will always be movies like this one.

Fortunately, the movie relies on its originality rather than spoofing other movies due to the horror/stupid factor, but in general, the movie is just silly and the type you want to watch with your brain on standby, except for the subtitles bit, that doesn't rely on crude toilet humor to bring out the laughs. It's an actually refreshing take on the horror-comedy genre, with some gayness added, and quite enjoyable. 5.5/10

masQP.jpg


Absolute Giganten (a.k.a. Gigantic) (Sebastian Schipper, 1997) -- A very well made coming-of-age movie about three youths in Hamburg and their last night together, along with an amazing soundtrack made up of electronic and rock, and some really entertaining driving scenes. The movie works as a tribute to friendship as well as a tribute to Northern Germany. It's about the need to be out, to be with your friends and just enjoying life. despite there's not much in the way of plot, it's a great movie about finding your place and belonging. 8/10

fU82s.jpg


Tetro (Francis Ford Coppola, 2009) -- Bennie travels to Buenos Aires to find his long-missing older brother, a once-promising writer who is now a remnant of his former self. Bennie's discovery of his brother's near-finished play might hold the answer to understanding their shared past and renewing their bond. An excellent movie by one of the masters, in my opinion, this is perhaps his most autobiographical work, especially when you compare it to the usual movies Coppola's been known to do, such as The Godfather, Apocalypse Now, The Outsiders, Bram Stoker's Dracula and Youth without Youth, so this is also his most realistic movie.

The movie explores important topics of families and relationship (relating also to Coppola's own) and how they affect their current relationship. The stark black and white filming coupled with the colored flashbacks adds to the feeling of the movie, where all the past seems better than the bleak present. Vincent Gallo's acting is excellent, as is Maribel VerdĂş, though again, she's Spanish, speaks Spaniard and is portrayed as an Argentine. But also due to its sentimentality, it has a much more European aura than his usual movies, and perhaps that's also why it received such good reviews in Europe vs. the ones in the US. Still, a great movie and one you should watch, even if it doesn't get a good number in IMDb. 8/10
 
Resident Evil Retribution

We watched this in 2d. This was easily one of the worst RE movies IMO. Some ok parts but overall just terrible. 👎

I also couldnt help but laugh when we were watching the previews. They showed a clip of Liam Neeson and Maggie Grace. As soon as they showed these two together, I whispered to my wife, "Taken 2?". Sure enough. The first Taken was great but come on seriously, Taken 2? Whats next, a Taken prequal? lol
 
If Taken 2 is half as awesome as Taken, then Taken 2 will be incredibly awesome. A Taken prequel could work. I would watch a movie that goes into how Neeson acquired his particular set of skills.
 
If Taken 2 is half as awesome as Taken, then Taken 2 will be incredibly awesome. A Taken prequel could work. I would watch a movie that goes into how Neeson acquired his particular set of skills.
A Taken sequal is already created, its called "Batman Begins". jk jk :sly:
 
Back