Originally posted by neon_duke
I edited the poll to include Agnostic as separate from Atheist.
I'm an atheist, and yes, I'm sure of it. This does not mean that I categorically deny the possible existence of a god, because you cannot prove that something does not exist. I just feel that lack of evidence against does not equate to evidence for.
Since it is not logical to believe that everything I've never seen must exist, I choose to believe what my physical senses tell me or can be derived from physical senses.
I recently got into an interesting discussion concerning the difference between agnosticism and atheism. I consider an agnostic to be a person who believes that there is approximately equal evidence for and against the existence of god(s), which I don't (hence the vote for "atheist"). This other person considered himself an agnostic for the "negative proof" reasons that I outlined above.
I don't believe that life has any greater meaning beyond itself. What more 'meaning' does it need?
As for the origin of life, the Universe is plenty large enough for such a seemingly impossible string of coincidences to have occured purely by random chance. Many times in many ways.