Korza
Premium
- 3,817

- Christchurch
- kamikazi493
Also, did you really just say that a Honda I4 - an engine widely lampooned for soundling like a souped up blender - sounds better than a V6?
Have you ever driven a VTEC powered car?
Also, did you really just say that a Honda I4 - an engine widely lampooned for soundling like a souped up blender - sounds better than a V6?
If it's a 96-up Si, then yes, but you know for a darn sure fact he's probably going to end up with a DX/EX or an older model. Also, there you go with refinement again. Considering this is a first car thread, I doubt comfort is high on the list.
Also, did you really just say that a Honda I4 - an engine widely lampooned for soundling like a souped up blender - sounds better than a V6?
DoogIf a Sebring is a sports car, I wonder what a 2.2 Camry is... 💡
But too stereotypical a choice IMO. Also makes you look like a radically immature car enthusiast if you do ANYTHING at all to it.
I see rice burners all the time in Connecticut. All I hear is them talking like "Sick car, bro!" "That looks sexy, ese!" Those are the reasons why most people drive a Civic or Camry (The ones that I listed).
Which oddly enough makes more power than your V6 that is twice the size, results in a faster car, and, you know, gets better fuel economy. Not to mention sounds better and is more refined, despite being a design that is around 20 years old as well.
And then, you know, those new turbo 4's that make over 100 HP per liter and are getting flatter torque curves and, again, better fuel economy.
But please, continue reinforcing your ignorance.
Volvo 740 Turbo wagon with manual tranny. It can take abuse, it has potential for great power, it gets good MPG, it can haul stuff, it's reliable, and nobody expects a turbo brick. And it is even more fun to drive than actual sporty hatches etc because you won't need to do 100mph in order to have a sensation of speed.
Sounds better? Are you out of your mind?
I doubt he'd be able to find one of those in Michigan. In the 80's and early 90's I would say a vast majority of cars bought in Michigan were domestic since the "buy American" mindset was still pretty strong.
Sounds better? Are you out of your mind?
Yeah, if he lived on a coast it would be different (I've seen quite a few 240s for sale around here in the past few years), but it's rare to find more "niche" brands in that section of the country.
Sounds better than the X Engines? Not particularly hard. GM made other pushrod V6s that sounded better than the 60 degree V6
Sounds better? Are you out of your mind?
Well, he does call himself "scientist and prophet"...
That is true.
Hard to respect a 1.6 liter VTEC anyway, but with an engine swap it shoud be OK.
I still think four cylinder engines are to be avoided at all costs for everything, but I suppose I could make exceptions for a sufficiently powerful non-Honda engine...
It has been suggested before.
Which was a reference to my avatar at the time, Gaius Baltar, who is from Battlestar Galactica.
Then why ask if I'm out of my mind? That V6, as others have mentioned, was nothing special at all. Honestly, most V6 engines don't sound particularly great to me, especially when compared to straight 6's from Japan and Europe.
I disagree. I think they sound bad. 6 banger engines from overseas sound considerably worse to me though. I can't stand them. This is my opinion though.
Theres nothing wrong with Honda's and your ignorance is rather annoying when talking about the subject. I take it you have a V6 which would most likely be the top of the line for your car line? What I find funny is that every I4 top end engine that Honda has is literally miles better.
B16's out of the SI's are 160 hp to the crank
B16b out of the Civic Type R's(granted its a JDM engine) @ 180
B17's out of the 92 GSR @ 170
B18c's out of the next gen GSR is the same, and the C5 @ 190
H22's out of 5th Gen Preludes @ 197, while the 4th Gen @ 180
I don't think the Civic got the B16 until long after the J Bodies had already switched to the Quad-4. Si Civics in America were D16s until then; which was long past 1992.
Though the Integra comparison is true, I suppose.
I don't think the Civic got the B16 until long after the J Bodies had already switched to the Quad-4. Si Civics in America were D16s until then, which was long past 1992; and the Prelude was a lot more expensive than the Cavalier.
Though the Integra comparison is true, I suppose.
True, though they all sound like farts to me. Also, VTEC = peaky without expensive tuning.
I doubt he'd be able to find one of those in Michigan. In the 80's and early 90's I would say a vast majority of cars bought in Michigan were domestic since the "buy American" mindset was still pretty strong.
If he did want something Scandinavian, a Saab would probably be easier to find.
**I just searched AutoTrader and the nearest wagon is in Pennsylvania, has nearly 300,000 miles on it, and is an automatic. There's no listings for a manual at all anywhere in the US.
What do you mean by peaky? Don't really understand the last part.
Well, there's always 9xx and S/V90.