GILLETDont worry I'm having the same problems. Probably and most likely he got so screwed up links, because we aren't seing jack.![]()
McLaren F1GTRHey...READ MY ENTIRE POST!
McLaren F1GTRI'm sure the Audi R8 would have to been included. Then they could race.
VipFREAKJust caught the Jaguar episode of Victory By Design. That XJ13 is sweet!won't ever here those kind of engine sounds ever again by a modern car. I was pissed though because they didn't show the EXP Speed 8.
![]()
GT-One Lover...i hope the 2002 bentley speed 8 will be in GT4(so u could compare it with the "LAST WORKS-AUDI FROM 2002!"...but i would never mind having that 2003 car in GT4,too!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
looks pretty good ,too!!👍
![]()
That's what I meant. So you could compare the 2.GT-One Lover...i hope the 2002 bentley speed 8 will be in GT4(so u could compare it with the "LAST WORKS-AUDI FROM 2002!"...but i would never mind having that 2003 car in GT4,too!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
looks pretty good ,too!!👍
![]()
The359Here is the history lesson:
1999 - Audi enters LeMans with two seperate types of cars, the R8R and the R8C.
R8R:
![]()
![]()
R8C:
![]()
![]()
As you can notice, these cars look completely different, even ignoring that one has a roof and one does not. Different designs to fenders, headlights, wings, intakes, vents, everything.
2000 - Audi selects the R8R as the superior car and evolves it into the R8, the R8C is taken back to be completely reworked.
R8:
![]()
As you can see, a natural evolution of the R8R, same turbo intakes, similar fenders, same exit ducts for front wheels, similar rear wing.
2001 - Audi continues to evolve the R8 while at the same time the R8C is brought back from its complete revamping as the new Bentley EXP Speed 8
EXP Speed 8:
![]()
A natural evolution of the R8C, the EXP Speed 8 has similar front fenders and headlights, the long pointy nose is drawn out, the rear wing is similar, everything.
2003 - Audi continues to slowly evolve the proven R8, requiring no major revamping, but the new Bentley Speed 8 is revolutionized to bring it up to par with the R8.
Speed 8:
![]()
As you can see, most of the changes on the Speed 8 over the older EXP Speed 8 are to the area between the front wheels where the front plane is lowered even more and the winglets are added to hold suspension pieces, but the nose seen on the R8C and EXP Speed 8 is still prominant in the design. The rear wing is indeed changed to a style similar to that of the R8, but I should point out that Pescarolo was using this layout as well.
So, after 4 years the Audi R8 and Bentley Speed 8 evolved from the Audi R8R and R8C. Both the R8R and R8C were different cars to begin with, and as they both evolved into the modern counterparts, they were seperated even more.
So in the end, the Audi R8 and Bentley Speed 8 have practically NOTHING in common save for the engine block used by the both of them (and even then, the specifics of the engines are completely different).
And for those of you who annoyingly claim the Bentley EXP Speed 8/Speed 8 is a rip off of the Toyota GT-One, please bear in mind that the Toyota GT-One was introduced in 1998 and the Audi R8C was shown to the public (but not raced) shortly after LeMans in 1998, meaning that it would be impossible for the Audi engineers to have seen the Toyota GT-One prior to them designing the R8C from scratch.
And if the Toyota GT-One were perfect, it would have won. If you want perfect, look no further then the Audi R8.
JAGUARMaybe they didn't show the EXP Speed 8 because its a Bentley not a Jaguar.![]()
BTW, a version of the Jaguar V12 used in the XJ13 powers the Lister Storm GTS car.
It could just have been running less wing to get a higher top speed.GT-One Loveri think the GT-One was the most aerodynamically OPTIMIZED CAR(JUST LOOK AT THE SPEED AT LM--->351KM/H!!!!!BENTLEY JUST REACHES ABOUT 335!!!and the lap times at LM GT-One 3:29 and bentley 3:31!!!)
Fastest lap was set during the 1999 race by Ukyo Katayama in the no.3 Toyota GT-One with a time of 3:35.032
GT-One Lover...and what´s this?
"""Taking styling cues from the Toyota GT-One, a good bit of first-hand knowledge from designer Tony Soutgate, and the financial resources of a passenger car producer such as Audi, you should have a winning car. But a winning car the first time out at Le Mans? Well, perhaps not. """
i copied it from this official LM site http://www.mulsannescorner.com/audir8c.htm and don´t think that the things there are wrong!!
to the GT-One,it was perfect but it had N-O luck!!
so u can be that perfect but it doesn´t help u when u don´t have luck!!!
...and why was the bentley design from 2001 and 2002 soooooooo similar to the design of TH TOYOTA GT-One,he,he??
i think the GT-One was the most aerodynamically OPTIMIZED CAR(JUST LOOK AT THE SPEED AT LM--->351KM/H!!!!!BENTLEY JUST REACHES ABOUT 335!!!and the lap times at LM GT-One 3:29 and bentley 3:31!!!)
just read this about the GT-One: 👍![]()
![]()
"""The Toyota GT-One was revolutionary for its new interpretation of the rules and interesting execution of design details. Making little pretenses of being a 'GT' car, it clearly was a pure bred prototype and subsequently the GT1 class became LMGTP. The GT-One certainly surprised but ultimately it never won a race during its short career. Regardless of its lack of a winning record, to this day, the GT-One embodies certain design details that put the car in a class of its own.
While not the first contemporary LMP/LMGTP to have a front diffuser, the GT-One's was certainly the most aggressive in its design and packaging."""
so don´t call this car(i love) in A-N-Y W-A-Y a bad car because it was good 👍 (it won in its own class at least and that tough toyota had very very much PROBLEMS!!!)![]()