Why are the recent seasonals so difficult?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Operation Ivy
  • 174 comments
  • 9,506 views
People moan about it being so, and then as soon as they need some practice on something, they put it down as too hard.

The "I want everything on a silver platter" mindset is a bad one to have in life.
Agree completely. If half the people in this game would just grab a stock car, adjust brake balance, turn off the aids, seasonals would be simple. Google lap times at Nordshliefe or Willow Springs and try to replicate the lap times on CS, if it is to hard try SS.Look in %90 of lobbies most are RS tires.
 
Why are the recent seasonals so difficult?

My hypothesis is because most people spend most their time in GT6 on RS tyres, so when they are forced to drive on sports or comfort tyres they have very little experience of that, which means that in addition to finding the best lines around the track they also have to struggle with basic car control.


Wait, wait, wait. You mean the reason past seasonal time trials were easier were because they were all using racing tires? Racing SOFTS of all things? That is quite the ascertainment.
 
Wait, wait, wait. You mean the reason past seasonal time trials were easier were because they were all using racing tires? Racing SOFTS of all things? That is quite the ascertainment.
There was more leeway with the first month and a half of the seasonal TTs - I think eran was refering to the people complaining being used to using RS everywhere else in the game. With the earlier seasonals being easier, they were able to catch those times, even on SH - but now that they are tighter, they just can't juggle the car restrictions and still get those times maybe.
 
What I don't understand about the community (and reflected in the existence and discussion of this thread), is the way they see the "win" in the seasonal.

For most it's: gold-> win | everything below -> not a win

This benchmark is set totally wrong, it should be:

Bronze -> Win | Everything Below -> not a win

I'm guessing most people can get bronze (if not all), or even silver. Why base complains on the gold benchmark?

Gold is what it is, the hardest of a particular seasonal event, not something for the average driver. The average driver should achieve bronze, the lowest win. If someone wants silver or gold, more power to them, but don't expect it without effort. They are not for instant gratification.

I still think seasonals are too easy. Far too easy. I am already driving stock without SRF to have a challenge (a real one for gold). I will only be satisfied when there is an event where I can't achieve gold. When that happens I will know the difficulty is set about right. (I only play a max of 10h per 14days (average 7h per 14 days), so anyone who plays more should be more able to gold them).

The difficulty is about right when these people who are now complaining about not getting gold could barely make it to bronze (The lowest win).

(Off course this would imply changing the difference between gold-bronze times). A 107% rule should be fine (like F1).

This mentality that everyone is entitled to gold is insane. Bronze is there for a reason. It means you passed the challenge. Want more recognition? work for it. Want to be the best? look at the leaderboards.

I am expecting people responding, that "oh the leaderboards are the challenge, you don't need to make the game so hard". If this reasoning is followed then the point of having the gold,silver,bronze trophies is none, because everything is justified with the leaderboard being the challenge. The Trophies are benchmarks, and the benchamark for a win is the bronze trophy. If the times follow a normal distribution, bronze should be calculated a priori on the expectations of average time + 1 standard deviation.
After seeing this, I thought I'd attempt to bring some perspective to the issue. I say "attempt" because SCE/PD (we blame PD for everything, but I thought SCE deserved a mention once in a while) put no effort whatsoever into sorting options for TT times/participants. I'm using the Subaru Impreza Super Lap event, as it is closed for updates.

First off, congrats to Ed_Night with his/her 1:14:639 top time. The gold benchmark for this event was 1:21:000 and I'm proud to say after going through what I did to get the limited info I now have I finished the event in 3,890th place with a 1:19:817. Proud? Yup, as over 23,000 got gold, being in the top 20% isn't bad for the lack of effort I put in.

Super-smart Mods, can you help here?
Does anyone have "easy" access to the total number of participants for this event? If so, can you further break down how many got silver/bronze? I'll start you off with the number 23,245; that's the number of folks scoring a 1:21:000 and under. This point I'm not sure about: does :000 get gold? If not, use 23,199, as that's how many scored 1:20:999. Anyone so dumb as to have done what I did to get those numbers knows now what I mean by "easy".

I've seen numbers before that suggest the average event gets about 50,000 participants, and if that holds here, I'd say less than half achieving gold is pretty stiff. As a side note, condolences to the two players that scored :001 and :002 above gold time (it is these two that make me suspect :000 gets gold). To be THAT close and give up. A further insight into these events might be gained if we knew how likely the average player is to compete if using a game-supplied car or one from his/her own garage. I personally do just about all of them (all that I've been privy to in GT6 so far, all gold), but much prefer using my own ride that I can do some tuning on.

One last thought: The great SRF debate; those squealing about segregated leaderboards: how about one excluding those using tuning specs they got from another player? Yes, quite impossible; but until you can weed your own garden, maybe a bit less dirt should be thrown around about this.
 
Last edited:
What I don't understand about the community (and reflected in the existence and discussion of this thread), is the way they see the "win" in the seasonal.

For most it's: gold-> win | everything below -> not a win

This benchmark is set totally wrong, it should be:

Bronze -> Win | Everything Below -> not a win

I'm guessing most people can get bronze (if not all), or even silver. Why base complains on the gold benchmark?

Gold is what it is, the hardest of a particular seasonal event, not something for the average driver. The average driver should achieve bronze, the lowest win. If someone wants silver or gold, more power to them, but don't expect it without effort. They are not for instant gratification.

I still think seasonals are too easy. Far too easy. I am already driving stock without SRF to have a challenge (a real one for gold). I will only be satisfied when there is an event where I can't achieve gold. When that happens I will know the difficulty is set about right. (I only play a max of 10h per 14days (average 7h per 14 days), so anyone who plays more should be more able to gold them).

The difficulty is about right when these people who are now complaining about not getting gold could barely make it to bronze (The lowest win).

(Off course this would imply changing the difference between gold-bronze times). A 107% rule should be fine (like F1).

This mentality that everyone is entitled to gold is insane. Bronze is there for a reason. It means you passed the challenge. Want more recognition? work for it. Want to be the best? look at the leaderboards.

I am expecting people responding, that "oh the leaderboards are the challenge, you don't need to make the game so hard". If this reasoning is followed then the point of having the gold,silver,bronze trophies is none, because everything is justified with the leaderboard being the challenge. The Trophies are benchmarks, and the benchamark for a win is the bronze trophy. If the times follow a normal distribution, bronze should be calculated a priori on the expectations of average time + 1 standard deviation.
An excellent approach I must say. As it is, Gold has little meaning in most TT's because most people can achieve it with some effort. I would take your concept one step further.

Bronze: Easy enough for even casual players, all aids allowed, full prizes awarded, separate leaderboard combined with Silver.

Silver: All aids allowed again, harder than bronze, this is the top tier for anyone using aids. Separate leaderboard combined with above.

Gold: Only ABS1 allowed, you must finish in the top 10,000 (or more or less or a percentage of entrants etc. ) worldwide. Special accolades and avatars that show both online and off how many golds you've achieved. Bench marks for 5, 10, 20 etc. Separate leaderboard from aids time, combined with Platinum.

Platinum: Fixed to the top 1000 with ABS1 only, regardless of the time. As above, special avatars, benchmarks etc.

Anyone who meets the "Bronze" time regardless of aids gets the prizes as well, so if you're going for gold, you'll likely meet the Bronze requirements along the way anyway.

Now you've got some competition. To get gold or platinum you would have to displace someone else which is what competition is all about. Not holding hands and singing Kumbaya and everyone who meets some artificial time gets gold, no you have to actually compete for it. But if you just want the prizes, all you have to do is meet the Bronze time which should be easy for inexperienced players with aids, and experienced players without.

One last thought: The great SRF debate; those squealing about segregated leaderboards: how about one excluding those using tuning specs they got from another player? Yes, quite impossible; but until you can weed your own garden, maybe a bit less dirt should be thrown around about this.

Nice fantasy, but it can't be policed nor is it a "Tuning Trial" it's a Time Trial. I think PD should have a site for official or recommended tunes for TT's so everyone has a shot at at least a baseline setup for the car in question. Most people playing the game have no idea how to tune and with all the tuning bugs in the game, if they followed PD's instructions they'd just get it wrong anyway.
 
So ABS1 only, where do I fit in :lol:

I can't wait PD released a TT with Oullim Spirra '04 ( no tuning ) on comfort tires and no SRF at Bathurst ( rain 50% water ), that would be so epic, epic fail :lol:
 
Last edited:
On RS tires with SRF on you mean:lol:. A survey of open lobbies at any given point would seem to back you up, and you would assume people who make it on line are really into the game. I consider myself a decent pilot and it takes me a few laps to get used to the switch from Comfort Softs to Sport Mediums and vice versa. If you're used to RS tires, driving on SH or CS must feel like driving on ice.

And it's not just that RS tires have more grip, they also behave in a different way. I rarely use racing tyres but whenever I do it feels really awkward and my lap times are probably nowhere near those who have more experience using them. So I wouldn't say RS is easier than Comfort or Sports tyres, but rather that they require different driving techniques, and if RS driving is all you practice, then very little of that experience can be used when you switch to CS.

Wait, wait, wait. You mean the reason past seasonal time trials were easier were because they were all using racing tires? Racing SOFTS of all things? That is quite the ascertainment.

No, it's probably because SRF has been allowed. In the latest Toyota seasonal it's not allowed, which means that if you have little experience driving on sports or comfort tyres it's going to be pretty hard. If you have been driving a lot with comfort or sports tyres, they really shouldn't be very difficult. I'm not a top driver by any standards but I still manage to get gold on everything after a couple of attempts. Probably because I have a lot of experience of sports and comfort tyres.
 
Last edited:
I was unable to gold the recent FXX seasonal @ Monza.
I attempted to do so using a wheel, no aids, no SRF, no TC, 0 ABS.
Just couldn't make the last 0.800 even after 600mi/1K km + distance logged.

But I gained something much more valuable than a gold digital token.
After dialing in the first chicane @ monza using 0 ABS in FXX...
...my brake foot is way more calibrated now than before.

I can take that prize with me to all the other tracks. :sly:
Thats what really counts, the rest is just fluff.
 
Last edited:
So ABS1 only, where do I fit in :lol:

I can't wait PD released a TT with Oullim Spirra '04 ( no tuning ) on comfort tires and no SRF at Bathurst ( rain 50% water ), that would be so epic, epic fail :lol:
If the leaderboards worked like this >>> http://www.mygranturismo.net/ then everyone could have their own leaderboards for whatever combination of aids or lack thereof they choose. But it must be really hard for PD to do..then again one guy did it probably working out of his basement for every single competition in GT5:lol:
 
Personally, I'm glad the TT challenges have raised the bar a bit. I have yet to not get a gold time so far, but will admit the last couple of new additions were more of a challenge. I think that's a good thing, because it adds to the interest of achieving gold. I'm no alien... hell, I'm barely a human compared to some drivers out there, but complacency is worse than not having a challenge for me to up my game.

I was pleasantly surprised to be forced to take SRF off. It is the last of the training wheels that I use to make me competitive against other players in my limited online experience. If the bar is raised enough to force me to learn to be a better player, the better competition I can offer to the ones that kick my butt. All I want is to be seen as an improving competitor instead of just cannon fodder. If I have to learn to be faster just to keep up, isn't that better for all involved, including myself?

I say up the bar even higher, force me to get better so I can enjoy the accolades so many others enjoy by being better than I am right now. I'm sick of being average(ish), I know I can do better, but I will never learn the taste of glory if I can pass with below average incentives. Make gold golden... not just a very shiny bronze like the TT's offer. Get me out of the house leagues and force me to try to go semi-pro at the very least. Stop spoon feeding me... PLEASE!

Cheers
 
Nice fantasy, but it can't be policed nor is it a "Tuning Trial" it's a Time Trial. I think PD should have a site for official or recommended tunes for TT's so everyone has a shot at at least a baseline setup for the car in question. Most people playing the game have no idea how to tune and with all the tuning bugs in the game, if they followed PD's instructions they'd just get it wrong anyway.
All true, and I know it's not possible, just a little example of the many ways folks "get around" what "competition" there is in GT6. All I'm saying is no one who uses others' tunes should be on here advocating for harder anything. And I'm still hoping a stat freak supplies some numbers for the overall question I posed above. You restated the assertion that "most" players still get gold; if the 50k figure once posted to me by Vagabond is true (most of the time), "most" do not get gold.
 
GT is what it is. Hardcore is in the effort and commitment some people put into the game, has nothing to do with how good or bad the game is.

I can perfectly understand putting comment and the effort as being a statement of hard core, but in the fashion as it being played or operated is far from hard core. And yes GT is what it is simple.
Addition:
Some find it more simple than others.

What would you know about hard core. I assume you actually play the game,tune in the game, (sorry "step tune") ,participate in FITT challenges,time trials etc. I know us mere mortals can't understand camber, classes, game sounds as well as some, but then again, I think we actually play the game.

I have the game and I enjoy playing the game. And you assumption is correct for once, nice work. I've participated in FITT challenges and found them boring due to the core bases of the tunes and how there done but the format is sound. The trails can be enjoyable at times, though I see improvements. As in understanding camber in VR, its simple put it at 0.0., how challenging is that. Understanding the classes is simple, know your car classes. Sound is anyone opinion, it all depends on the ears and your judgement. And I play the game as well.
 
Last edited:
All true, and I know it's not possible, just a little example of the many ways folks "get around" what "competition" there is in GT6. All I'm saying is no one who uses others' tunes should be on here advocating for harder anything. And I'm still hoping a stat freak supplies some numbers for the overall question I posed above. You restated the assertion that "most" players still get gold; if the 50k figure once posted to me by Vagabond is true (most of the time), "most" do not get gold.
It's possible only half or less get gold on Seasonals I'm only guessing. My idea for what I'd do with TT's is HERE. Essentialy make it easier for everyone to get the prizes, but not so easy to get the higher level recognition of Gold and Platinum. Guys that really want to focus on the TT's can do so for the recognition and feeling of accomplishment, people who aren't nearly as skilled can still particpate and choose a level of aids that gets them the prizes but only a Bronze of Silver ranking. IMO this would bring out more competitiveness, more participation, and it's a win-win for everyone.

I think each winning replay should be on an official Youtube Channel created by PD or Sony just for this purpose for added recognition. I'd throw in other prizes too. For example, win 5 TT's and get an all expenses paid trip to PD headquarters and meet the Kaz himself.
 
Personally, I'm glad the TT challenges have raised the bar a bit. I have yet to not get a gold time so far, but will admit the last couple of new additions were more of a challenge. I think that's a good thing, because it adds to the interest of achieving gold. I'm no alien... hell, I'm barely a human compared to some drivers out there, but complacency is worse than not having a challenge for me to up my game.

I was pleasantly surprised to be forced to take SRF off. It is the last of the training wheels that I use to make me competitive against other players in my limited online experience. If the bar is raised enough to force me to learn to be a better player, the better competition I can offer to the ones that kick my butt. All I want is to be seen as an improving competitor instead of just cannon fodder. If I have to learn to be faster just to keep up, isn't that better for all involved, including myself?

I say up the bar even higher, force me to get better so I can enjoy the accolades so many others enjoy by being better than I am right now. I'm sick of being average(ish), I know I can do better, but I will never learn the taste of glory if I can pass with below average incentives. Make gold golden... not just a very shiny bronze like the TT's offer. Get me out of the house leagues and force me to try to go semi-pro at the very least. Stop spoon feeding me... PLEASE!

Cheers
Well said.
 
I barely got gold after running for 2 hours with the FXX. And that's coming from an asian with early season SMA/AMA national-B license. And my best position was 3rd out of 15 in a wrx open time attack. This is crazy hard..
 
I have easily gotten gold on every event but the 3 new ones and the FT 1 are unusually difficult. I've driven over 200km with the Tajima and got up to 1:01.300 and can't get any better. I've done it for over 20 laps and no improvement

The gold time on the FT-1 TT is 1:46, the top guy has gone almost 6 (SIX) seconds inside of it.
The is meant to be a competition, its not meant to be 'easy' to get that gold. When I did my first TT (was the nurburg one in the BMW) I finished in 3520th place, the other night I got a top 100 time in the london TT, the only way you're going to improve is to put in way more laps than 20, you go to them, don't expect them to come to you (no disrespect) :)
 
It's possible only half or less get gold on Seasonals I'm only guessing. My idea for what I'd do with TT's is HERE. Essentialy make it easier for everyone to get the prizes, but not so easy to get the higher level recognition of Gold and Platinum. Guys that really want to focus on the TT's can do so for the recognition and feeling of accomplishment, people who aren't nearly as skilled can still particpate and choose a level of aids that gets them the prizes but only a Bronze of Silver ranking. IMO this would bring out more competitiveness, more participation, and it's a win-win for everyone.

I think each winning replay should be on an official Youtube Channel created by PD or Sony just for this purpose for added recognition. I'd throw in other prizes too. For example, win 5 TT's and get an all expenses paid trip to PD headquarters and meet the Kaz himself.
"Guys that really want to focus on the TT's can do so for the recognition and feeling of accomplishment"....Eh....but.....aren't you guys doing just that now? I probably spent 30+ minutes (that's more than I put into any two Seasonal events, I promise you) yesterday compiling figures someone has at their fingertips in seconds. So I'm not doing it again for another event. But my feeling is most already participate in Seasonals just to feel a sense of accomplishment based on their previous experiences. IE: if someone hates tuning and is just playing GT for drifting, maybe Bronze is all they aspire to and are relieved every time they achieve that much. I feel personally no sense of "recognition" at all getting gold, and I'm fine with that. It was a test, I passed it, time to move on. Why do the tests have to be harder? You say they're a competition....why? Because there's a comparison of times? If I wished to compete against "the world" I'd race online. But I don't play very well with others so I abstain (you're welcome:lol:). I'm in no way trying to be adversarial with you, I like and respect many things I see come from you. But one of us is reading this event incorrectly, or putting more into it than necessary. You super guys can go have a "mother of all races" anytime you want and post all the results here, on YT, wherever. But for me (and how many others?) the Seasonal TTs are simply a way to introduce new events that mix up the cars you experience and offer a small token as incentive. There's the chance to informally see how you're doing against everyone else connected online, but nothing more. DON'T RACE ME, BRO! :lol: Yeah I just had to :lol: (for those who don't get it, that's a play on the hilarious memes showing "dudes" in bad places begging the coppers "DON'T TAZE ME, BRO!"). :cheers:
 
"Guys that really want to focus on the TT's can do so for the recognition and feeling of accomplishment"....Eh....but.....aren't you guys doing just that now? I probably spent 30+ minutes (that's more than I put into any two Seasonal events, I promise you) yesterday compiling figures someone has at their fingertips in seconds. So I'm not doing it again for another event. But my feeling is most already participate in Seasonals just to feel a sense of accomplishment based on their previous experiences. IE: if someone hates tuning and is just playing GT for drifting, maybe Bronze is all they aspire to and are relieved every time they achieve that much. I feel personally no sense of "recognition" at all getting gold, and I'm fine with that. It was a test, I passed it, time to move on. Why do the tests have to be harder? You say they're a competition....why? Because there's a comparison of times? If I wished to compete against "the world" I'd race online. But I don't play very well with others so I abstain (you're welcome:lol:). I'm in no way trying to be adversarial with you, I like and respect many things I see come from you. But one of us is reading this event incorrectly, or putting more into it than necessary. You super guys can go have a "mother of all races" anytime you want and post all the results here, on YT, wherever. But for me (and how many others?) the Seasonal TTs are simply a way to introduce new events that mix up the cars you experience and offer a small token as incentive. There's the chance to informally see how you're doing against everyone else connected online, but nothing more. DON'T RACE ME, BRO! :lol: Yeah I just had to :lol: (for those who don't get it, that's a play on the hilarious memes showing "dudes" in bad places begging the coppers "DON'T TAZE ME, BRO!"). :cheers:
The entire thrust of your post fits perfectly into the setup I proposed. Is that what you're trying to say?
 
As far as the 3 newest TT's are concerned, the one that gave me problems was the Electric Tajima, mainly due to a lack of gears, which I use to brake and position myself for the apex. It took me 10 minutes to get within 0.600 seconds of gold, but another hour to finally beat the gold by 0.300 seconds. I used no aids except ABS 1. It was challenging and frustrating at the same time, but I enjoyed it. The RX7 and Peugeot TT's were far easier, gold in RX7 after 6 laps, gold in 106 Rallye after 2 laps. I don't really look at the cars on the leaderboard to make my choice when presented with one, if I'm off by more than 5 seconds from gold, I'll check the fastest replay to see if I'm missing something as far as line is concerned.

As many have stated before, I wish we had some seasonal races, not only TT's. This however is not a deal breaker for me. Something that we can all use is better than nothing, and it's also better than something only people in Japan with an 86GT can use.
 
The entire thrust of your post fits perfectly into the setup I proposed. Is that what you're trying to say?
Not at all, sorry. PD gives us all an event, to do with as we please. Remember in every event they give us, there's a subtle point to be made. Always has been. That's the excuse for all the Vitzes and Corsas we've ever driven. I don't deny that quite likely the point is lost on many. Even the Seasonal races were a touch more than just "chase the rabbit for a few quid" or an interesting (or not) diversion. My ONLY problem with how they do this is the on-again off-again driver's aids. To me, that's PD saying "we know SOMEthing's wrong, but we're not admitting it to anyone". It's truly difficult to do 100-some-odd races with all aids available (career, or offline) and then have an event where the things you've learned to use are taken away. I'm horrified to admit that if stats had a window for showing "favorite tire" right now mine would show RS, because of my grinding on Nurburgring. And because it's at night and raining, you dang right I have ABS1 and SRF on, along with TC2. Can you imagine the habits I've accumulated? But every once in a while, I get to set that aside, climb out of my Subarus, and take a spin in something different, with different conditions. And it doesn't get much more different than the last three TTs, no? At first I hated the Mazda TT, because of course I was all over the road and slip-slidin' away at every turn. I buckled down, tuned a mite here and there, concentrated a bit better, and got gold within 7 or 8 laps. Eventually, after all the back-and-forth on this site, I went back, tinkered some more, and just to prove to myself I could, I took two more seconds off that gold time. You guys inspired it, but I was my own reason to improve. I don't need an external reason. And I just don't believe PD should take a greater risk of losing more customers just to create more division than already exists amongst the whole wide spectrum of GTers. And I believe human nature tells us that if you make something more exclusive, more will try to attain it, and more will become angry and frustrated when they don't. I understand guys with expensive rigs or big egos wanting a lofty stage to perform on, but this isn't just for "those guys", IMO. :cheers:
 
And I just don't believe PD should take a greater risk of losing more customers just to create more division than already exists amongst the whole wide spectrum of GTers. And I believe human nature tells us that if you make something more exclusive, more will try to attain it, and more will become angry and frustrated when they don't. I understand guys with expensive rigs or big egos wanting a lofty stage to perform on, but this isn't just for "those guys", IMO. :cheers:
Explain to me then how my Proposal would "risk losing more customers", under your assumption that half or less of people currently get gold. Please don't make a generalized statement, try to be specific and refer directly to the points I made.
 
Not at all, sorry. PD gives us all an event, to do with as we please. Remember in every event they give us, there's a subtle point to be made. Always has been. That's the excuse for all the Vitzes and Corsas we've ever driven. I don't deny that quite likely the point is lost on many. Even the Seasonal races were a touch more than just "chase the rabbit for a few quid" or an interesting (or not) diversion. My ONLY problem with how they do this is the on-again off-again driver's aids. To me, that's PD saying "we know SOMEthing's wrong, but we're not admitting it to anyone". It's truly difficult to do 100-some-odd races with all aids available (career, or offline) and then have an event where the things you've learned to use are taken away. I'm horrified to admit that if stats had a window for showing "favorite tire" right now mine would show RS, because of my grinding on Nurburgring. And because it's at night and raining, you dang right I have ABS1 and SRF on, along with TC2. Can you imagine the habits I've accumulated? But every once in a while, I get to set that aside, climb out of my Subarus, and take a spin in something different, with different conditions. And it doesn't get much more different than the last three TTs, no? At first I hated the Mazda TT, because of course I was all over the road and slip-slidin' away at every turn. I buckled down, tuned a mite here and there, concentrated a bit better, and got gold within 7 or 8 laps. Eventually, after all the back-and-forth on this site, I went back, tinkered some more, and just to prove to myself I could, I took two more seconds off that gold time. You guys inspired it, but I was my own reason to improve. I don't need an external reason. And I just don't believe PD should take a greater risk of losing more customers just to create more division than already exists amongst the whole wide spectrum of GTers. And I believe human nature tells us that if you make something more exclusive, more will try to attain it, and more will become angry and frustrated when they don't. I understand guys with expensive rigs or big egos wanting a lofty stage to perform on, but this isn't just for "those guys", IMO. :cheers:
Not to start an argument, or attack you personally, so don't take it personally...

I find all aids except ABS 1 take the fun of driving in the game away from me. I actually found it annoying that SRF was forced on during some TT's because when I tried to drive using my regular driving style, I was unable to due to SRF interfering with my inputs. So it took me a few laps to get used to it. (Kind of opposite of your experience)

I do not use racing tires when I play (Red Bull X Challenge, and forced events excepted). I find the sports tires to be perfect for a balance between stickiness and feeling what the car wants to do. Going from hard to soft based on the power the car is putting out. Also if I drive a Race Car (Touring cars and such) I will use RH's.

Having said that, the Tajima on sports tires was kind of dumb, it's a race car, should've been on RH's...
 
An excellent approach I must say. As it is, Gold has little meaning in most TT's because most people can achieve it with some effort. I would take your concept one step further.

Bronze: Easy enough for even casual players, all aids allowed, full prizes awarded, separate leaderboard combined with Silver.

Silver: All aids allowed again, harder than bronze, this is the top tier for anyone using aids. Separate leaderboard combined with above.

Gold: Only ABS1 allowed, you must finish in the top 10,000 (or more or less or a percentage of entrants etc. ) worldwide. Special accolades and avatars that show both online and off how many golds you've achieved. Bench marks for 5, 10, 20 etc. Separate leaderboard from aids time, combined with Platinum.

Platinum: Fixed to the top 1000 with ABS1 only, regardless of the time. As above, special avatars, benchmarks etc.

Anyone who meets the "Bronze" time regardless of aids gets the prizes as well, so if you're going for gold, you'll likely meet the Bronze requirements along the way anyway.

Now you've got some competition. To get gold or platinum you would have to displace someone else which is what competition is all about. Not holding hands and singing Kumbaya and everyone who meets some artificial time gets gold, no you have to actually compete for it. But if you just want the prizes, all you have to do is meet the Bronze time which should be easy for inexperienced players with aids, and experienced players without.
I responded to your post with the proposal, as it'll be easier for me to make sure I hit everything.
Bronze: It's far too easy for "prizes" now, IMO. Why on earth would you award every prize an event has to offer for this? GT5 had more collectability, so each prize was valued by a goodly number of participants, and was the reward, IMO, to try harder (as opposed to climbing the rankings being the reward).
Silver: Two things....if you're not a typical gold-medalist, why would you bother, other than "just that tiny bit more...." that drives those who want gold now? And the whole question of separate leaderboards for this and that is simply wish list stuff, IMO. There are far bigger fish to fry in this game, IMO.
Gold: ONLY ABS? You're asking PD to create a whole new rewards tier and you're going to insult them by suggesting their brakes aren't up to snuff? Then there's my pet peeve: is sharing setups allowed for this? So Joe Shmoe from Pocono can just input CargoRatt's latest and greatest hit and exclude me? Within current rankings, I'm a top-10,000 player. Some weeks I can't be bothered, and take my 9,852 and feel just fine. Some weeks I like the combo presented, and I'm up there at the 2ks. Why should my mood exclude anyone from a reasonable outcome? There are folks playing this game that only "play the game" until they get their hands on a X car and do everything possible to never touch another car again. Likewise, folks collect 60's Japanese throw-arounds because they look cool with modern pearl paints and tiny racing wheels and never touch another car. PD's aim should be to bring those folks in more, not find new ways to segregate us further. And no one who thinks a '71 240Z is "just fast enough, thank you" wants to even consider something like a Viper GTS without some TC.
Platinum: You guys feel free to make up your own award. You're the ones who think you're in "competition". Perhaps you could propose an event to PD along the lines of bone-stock, with no aids whatsoever? Pick your tranny, adjust your steering sensitivity, and t-t-t-t-t-that's all folks! Then every single player is on a level playing field.

Please understand, it's not that I don't care for new ideas, or incentives, but everyone who bought this game deserves some pleasure from it. Many find ways to make their own entertainment where PD has "failed" to do so. You guys already have an entire forum to track your exploits. Why does PD need to officially "recognize" this?
 
Not to start an argument, or attack you personally, so don't take it personally...

I find all aids except ABS 1 take the fun of driving in the game away from me. I actually found it annoying that SRF was forced on during some TT's because when I tried to drive using my regular driving style, I was unable to due to SRF interfering with my inputs. So it took me a few laps to get used to it. (Kind of opposite of your experience)

I do not use racing tires when I play (Red Bull X Challenge, and forced events excepted). I find the sports tires to be perfect for a balance between stickiness and feeling what the car wants to do. Going from hard to soft based on the power the car is putting out. Also if I drive a Race Car (Touring cars and such) I will use RH's.

Having said that, the Tajima on sports tires was kind of dumb, it's a race car, should've been on RH's...
I take no offense, that's the name of the game: finding your style and having fun. You paid for yours, I paid for mine, we can go from there:cheers:. And yes, SRF cuts down on a lot of responsiveness if you just tune a car "the usual" and then slap SRF on it. I tune my rides with SRF off, but in mind. As my favorite grind is Nurburgring, I want to feel that seat-shifting swing and sway going through the twisty bits and usually SRF agrees with me and provides exactly the experience I'm wanting. There are also times when SRF interferes far too much and off it goes. Not very often, mind you, but it happens. I believe my understanding of how I use it is why I can fairly casually go to these Seasonals with it forced off and actually achieve gold; because my use of SRF is not dependent, but simply as another tuning tool.

Just FYI, I use RS on the 'Ring when grinding because a) I use a lot of Subarus there, and they seem to me to handle the rain better than RH, and b) because I can and they don't wear out between my pit at the end of lap one, and the end. Even with the BRZ GT300 base car, which I think is the one with RWD, which can make it all three laps without pitting, can make it on RS tires. And that last lap, when the tires have started to hit 7s and 8s, is a DOOZY! :cheers:

EDIT: AW CRAP, GUYS! I was hoping a response to the above would prevent me from double-posting. SORRY!
 
While I understand and agree with your philosophy, we also need to accept that some people just don't have the time to put into the game to be good enough to get the prizes and money from Seasonals, my only dilemma is, I don't want the whole thing dumbed down to the lowest common denominator for everyone, to please the most casual of users.

Don't get me wrong, I agree with most people here so far, but at the same time I still like a challenge.
My biggest problem is time. I don't own any of the 15m or 20m credit cars, I can't afford them, but I would still like to try them. I don't have enough time to grind a race for however 3-4 hours JUST to buy one car.
PD are changing things for the wrong reasons, giving us features we can't use...

How about making it a bit easier to earn money?
Make the game playable for EVERYBODY, not just the ones who have it running for 3-4 hours or more every day.
 
You still haven't answered my original
I can perfectly understand putting comment and the effort as being a statement of hard core, but in the fashion as it being played or operated is far from hard core. And yes GT is what it is simple.
Addition:
Some find it more simple than others.



I have the game and I enjoy playing the game. And you assumption is correct for once, nice work. I've participated in FITT challenges and found them boring due to the core bases of the tunes and how there done but the format is sound. The trails can be enjoyable at times, though I see improvements. As in understanding camber in VR, its simple put it at 0.0., how challenging is that. Understanding the classes is simple, know your car classes. Sound is anyone opinion, it all depends on the ears and your judgement. And I play the game as well.

Well Zuel would you mind posting 1 of your "core base" FITT tunes that I have never seen?
Camber in VR does not apply to this game,but now you agree 0/0 is correct:banghead:
Classes? Can you still answer my question or are you going to avoid this also?

Zuel said
Mid size class 400 to 465pp, full size class 562 to 600pp.


I've already answered you question.

If you got to take the time to make a mem as they're called or anyone, then you got trouble. LOL OH MY GOSH, starting to hurt. LOL.

So what "class" do 466 to 561 PP cars fall into?
 
They should have made the game with different difficulty levels right from the start.

For example:

Easy: Most aids forced on. (ASM & driving line optional)
Normal: ABS forced on, TCS & SRF optional. All others off.
Difficult: All aids forced off. (ABS1 optional)

Or something like that... :)
 
They should have made the game with different difficulty levels right from the start.

For example:

Easy: Most aids forced on. (ASM & driving line optional)
Normal: ABS forced on, TCS & SRF optional. All others off.
Difficult: All aids forced off. (ABS1 optional)

Or something like that... :)
My only problem with how you propose the structure is why "force" people to learn what are generally agreed to be bad habits? I'll echo VBR's constant cry of "more options", but also better adjustability, of the aids as well as the actual tuning.
 
My only problem with how you propose the structure is why "force" people to learn what are generally agreed to be bad habits? I'll echo VBR's constant cry of "more options", but also better adjustability, of the aids as well as the actual tuning.

I hear what you say, but remember there are varying levels of players - from very casual to hard-core. The very casual guys would probably not give a damn about the bad habits, since in all likelihood they would probably only play the game for a couple of months in any event?
 
PD still gives us the bells and whistles in the aids department (TC on karts, not exactly a shining moment), but after people profusely begging for harder events, we get things which require some skill or effort, and apparently it's too hard.
HEY!

TCS and SRF for the Karts were necessary, saved me from giving up them for good!!!! So spare a damn thought for the casual players!!!!!
 
Back