Well that maybe the case, but I don't understand why it's mandatory to have played the first game before you can comment on the latest version.
I don't recall anyone saying that it was.
Well lets go back to what you posted...
Did you play the first game at all?
If you read my posts you will see I am playing the game
Yes, I can see your posts saying that you are playing this game, but the question was if you played the first game at all.
GT1? Why is that relevent.
The first Gran Turismo was the first game in the Gran Turismo series.
Really? Well I never. Who'd have thought it. You were pretty adamant in drumming this fact home.
Just because they used the tagline from the beginning doesn't make it right.
No, but it rather renders the complaint moot; the series has always used the tag and always featured fictional and quasi-fictional vehicles.
I really don't want to go here, but Craven cigarettes used the tagline 'good for your throat'. They used that from the beginning as well. Using a tagline from the beginning doesn't make it right.
ACBrizvegas:
↑
I have played the previous 2 versions of GT and there were of course some non-existent cars in these as well.
GT Sport is the seventh main game, and 12th commercially available game in the GT series.
So I'm not allowed to voice an opinion because I haven't played/do not know all the releases?
ACBrizvegas:
↑
However, there were not nearly as many (fake cars) as there are in GT sport.
That's fundamentally false. There's more fictional vehicles in GT6 than there are vehicles of any kind in GT Sport.
Thats's because there were loads more cars in general in GT6. How many campaign races were you forced to race a fantasy car.
ACBrizvegas:
↑
I am simply expressing an opinion that I like to race
real cars and I would prefer it if GT concentrated on
real cars rather than fantasy ones for the next version.
That's cool and everything, but GT has never done that, in the entire 20-year history of the title, so you're looking at the wrong game series if that's your particular preference.
What then? Forsa? Need for speed? Just think GT could be more realistic then it is and therefore better..
ACBrizvegas:
↑
If you prefer racing cars that don't actually exist and want GT to continue down this path just say so.
I don't care.
ACBrizvegas:
↑
Personally, I don't think it adds anything to the game - why do you think it does?
They definitely add something to the game, because without them there'd be less game.
No. I don't think GT needs to expand the game with fantasy vehicles. Why not use some of the thousands of cars that actually exist. Instead of a rocket ship red bull never existing car use a reliant robin. Swap the stupid fantasy concepts for a Lada. I saw they added a Crown athlete which was great. Would love a Crown Majesta...but will probably get a GT/Mercedes virtual imaginary thingy.
Sorry I keep quoting the tag line ' the real driving simulator'. It's just a game and I like it a lot. What do you think it should be changed to?
It seems fine to me, because it simulates real driving - whether the car you're pretending to drive is 'real' or not.
Saying it's real when the car isn't real doesn't make sense.
Obviously we have opposing views. I think GT should concentrate on modelling real cars. You think they should continue focusing on concepts.
Converasation ends as it will just go round and roundi in circles. Thanks.