The reason i like Oulton Park is because its hill and blind corner and tight design. Its a real track. I would class it in the line of Zolder, difficult, fantastic to race on, and great test of skill and sportsmanship. The UK has tracks that are overrated. Brands Hatch is lame and Silverstone is boring. Oulton Park, Cadwell Park, Donnington and Snetterton all have about three variants.
Tracks in the UK are generally of two types. Park circuits, that are derived from the former park gardens of stately homes, and airfield cuircuits, that are derived from the perimeter roads of old RAF airfields left over from WW2.
The all offer different challenges, and are all recreated to different degree in various titles, and I would personally disagree that Brands is boring (having driven it), GTS has a nasty habit of neutering tracks making at Brands both Paddock hill and Sheene curves far easier to drive than they are in reality (or for that matter AC and PC2) however the factor that you claim makes track interesting would die at more track if you got your way later on in your post.
In GT Sport they would increase track roaster alot and also they are all the best UK tracks. Tracks like Spa are also overrated, it then means them tracks charge more to have it in games. Its time the fia jumped in and stopped the monopoly style licensing rights.
The FIA don't own the tracks so would have zero say in that.
Also the fia have a motto of "Safety In Road Action" They banned AWD and its the safest drivetrain in the world as proven by subaru at n24, every year. For people who regulate motorsport to ban the safest drivetrain is not only concerning for they way their heads function (politest way to describe them without swearing or direct offense) or if you take a look at what snetterton 200 looks like in project cars in the menu selection or brids eye view is what the fia are for banning awd but also shows they still dont understand that if they didnt ban it every racing car today would be awd. So back 20 years ago when they all smoked cigs and went out on the booze and made the ban, maybe now they actually see they were wrong? This is a forum and keeping a forum going is good so replys always good
if gt3 changed then most gt3 cars would be awd as their road going counterparts are awd and awd is also the drivetrain for the 2020 gtp (gt1) return so it should be allowed as its clear all manufacturers going into gtp (gt1) already have awd ready lol
Motorsport safety is far, far from this simple and to be blunt you are quite wrong to suggest that any drivetrain is 'safer'.
AWD is arguably not the safest drivetrain at all, as it increases cornering speed, and that means that when an accident (and one will happen) the accident will happen with more force and travel further, its basic physics - force = mass x acceleration.
Anything that increases a cars speed, particularly in the corners makes accidents worse, well unless you then change the track layout. Look at every time that motorsport technology has increased speeds, particularly in corners, MR layout in F1, people died; Aero, people died, AWD in the WRC, people died.
The only safe form of motorsport is the one we engage in (the virtual one), after that is the lightest, slowest cars that are 'safest' and even that is still relative to the track itself.
So as you get to quicker cars, to keep them safe you have to change the track, which is why F1 tracks are considered by many to be boring, as they need to be FIA catagory 1 circuits for them to race at, its exactly the same with LMP spec cars, they need FIA grade 1 circuits to race. FIA grade 1 circuits have limits on the elevation changes, run-off areas (size and make-up of them), barrier constructions, how close the viewing areas are, where the viewing areas are.
So your demand for AWD would increase cornering speeds for GT3 and Touring cars to such as degree that they would potentially no longer be able to race at a lot of older circuits, unless those circuits carried out fundamental changes to the layout and nature of the circuit. Just take a look at whats happened over the years to Silverstone for an example of this, as in the past it had a good deal of elevation change for an airfield circuit. Even old park circuits such as Hockenheim and Spa have not been immune to these factors.
To put this into context the UK has one Grade 1 circuit, and for that circuit its a single layout (Silverstone GP); moving to Grade 2 and 3 and it increases to 11 circuits and 16 layouts. That would seriously limit the UK's potential access to FIA events if AWD were to be adopted in the manner you suggest, with one layout of one circuit being the only track for even more race series.
That's all an utter aside from the fact that a lot of the appeal of different car layouts is that they don't all drive in the same way and present different challenges to the drivers, which makes the racing more interesting for the drivers, spectators and more of an engineering challenge for the teams.
I also strongly recommend that you read "Life on the Limit" and "Beyond the Limit" to actually understand what safety in Motorsport actually involves.