- 1,003
if GM did go bankrupt, youd see a hell of a lot of people who wished they had bought american cars instead of camrys
last I heard, saturn was the cheap GM company... behind everything else... unless they changed it since then... i wouldnt know if they did, cause I hate all things saturn besides the ion red line, but even the reg ions look bad to me... and every old one I see has the loudest valve tapping I've ever heard... but thats probly due to owners never ever changing their oil
I thought they killed off Olds.. why are they still around??
BlazinXtremeBack when they came out there were supposed to be but now they are far from a cheap brand
BlazinXtremeThe Saturns are selling well, GM didn't shoot themselves in the foot. I would gladly take a Saturn verison of a car then another verison. Example, I would take the Ion over the Cobalt, the VUE over a Equinox, and a Sky over a Soltice.
BlazinXtremeI would love to own a Redline, but I have to remember I'm getting married soon and that's not a family type car.
While the Sky is definately right and the Ion is rather iffy, I highly doubt the Vue's superiority over the Equinox. Especially since the Vue is all ugly and wavy now. The only thing the Vue had over the Equinox was good looks (and the Equinox is no Pontiac Aztek, either) and available Honda power, and one of those things is gone now. Saturns are better built Chevrolets than Chevrolets are these days, and their gimmicky plastic bodies has to sell cars.BlazinXtremeThe Saturns are selling well, GM didn't shoot themselves in the foot. I would gladly take a Saturn verison of a car then another verison. Example, I would take the Ion over the Cobalt, the VUE over a Equinox, and a Sky over a Soltice.
Yes, they will always be around, but I think their run as "fashion statement" has pretty much run it's course.BlazinXtremeSUV's will always be around, big ones, small ones, doesn't matter. The era isn't over because you have people that won't buy these cross overs...I know I won't because truely a car based SUV is nothing more then a big station wagon. A truck based SUV is just a truck you can haul people with instead of crap.
Really? I thought they came out pretty similar once you optioned them the same way. Maybe the discounts made the difference.BlazinXtremeThe EXT was far cheaper and some people liked the look of it better.
SUV's will always be around, but that's not what the article was talking about. It was referring to the popularity of the SUV, how it surged in the late 90's, and how that popularity is now dwindling as more and more consumers opt for smaller, more fuel-efficient cars.BlazinXtremeSUV's will always be around, big ones, small ones, doesn't matter. The era isn't over because you have people that won't buy these cross overs...I know I won't because truely a car based SUV is nothing more then a big station wagon. A truck based SUV is just a truck you can haul people with instead of crap.
BlazinXtremeI think the popularity is still very strong, I see more SUV's and trucks on the road then cars now a days. I think people will still buy SUV's, regaurdless of the price of fuel. Hell I drive an SUV.
The buying public already has a SUV image. Big, not enviro-friendly, and gas guzzling. No amount of miracle engineering will fix that.BlazinXtremeIt won't decrease, GM's new line of full sizes will be the most fuel efficent yet. I mean a Tahoe that gets 20mpg is really good for something that will haul, you, the wife, the kids, the dog, adn the boat. Companies will just switch their engineering to make the SUV more buyable.
Good point.Disturbed07skip - I don't think people are worried about when it tows, since a Camry certainly can't do the job, and I don't think there is a fuel effecient way to tow, people who need/want to tow things like, boats trailers, and so forth, will keep doing it
They should release a hybrid, that will give them a better image than a diesel. Plus, diesels can't be sold in Massachusetts or California.BlazinXtremeAnd GM is going to release the diesel for pretty much all of the 900 line up.
GM hasn't yet done an "exciting" design that wins over a majority of buyers without being "weird". They tried: Aztek, SSR, HHR...not one really took off or was well liked. Probably becuse they were "flashy" but had no substance to underly that (HHR excluded).ZardozThis story is almost weird. Has GM really been unaware that a lot of its cars have been just plain boring lately?
This is news to GM execs?
They should release a hybrid, that will give them a better image than a diesel. Plus, diesels can't be sold in Massachusetts or California.