Shelby Daytona Coupe
Or
Shelby Cobra
Hard one again but Audis bore me so M3E90 M3
or Audi S4?
1967 GT500
or
1969 GT500
VW Golf R
Or Mazda 3 MPS?
-> ...
FR-S
or
RX-8 R3
or
S2000
![]()
2003 Audi RS6
or
2004 Mercedes Benz E55 AMG
As much as I dislike Ferrari as a company, I love their cars. This one is very hard to pick, but I'll take the Ferrari. It appears to have more ''personality'' and soul than the MP4.
Just imagine telling people you've got a car that its name is closer to a fax machine than a car. (Yeah I know the real meaning behind the ''name'')
Tough one, but the MP4-12C gets my vote
The 458 seems to have become the Toyota Corolla of supercars.
xXKingJoshXxToo common? Overused? The car everyone goes to get when they don't do their research?
Too common? Overused? The car everyone goes to get when they don't do their research?
Obviously.Not many people are wealthy enough to afford a 458.
Obviously.
What I meant was that the 458 (and the Gallardo) seems to be the "default" supercar among the wealthy. At least in my observations.
I agree with that, there are about 5 458s in the island, while there are something like 4 gallardos. Considering the amount of time the gallardo has been in production it is pretty amazing. Then again it cannot be compared to the massive amount of GTRs that have popped up lately, they seem to have taken a lot of 911 sales as I'm seeing more GTRs than 911s
I definitely would not say it's over used or common. I guess it depends where you live. The majority of the people in my community are upper-middle class. Not many people are wealthy enough to afford a 458.
GTRs depreciate in value quite a bit. That plays a large factor in why you see more on the roads today.
Actually there is a lot of demand for them here so they don'r depreciate much. Being relative a 2009 GTR has depreciated less or about the same as a 2009 997 turbo. Right now I was looking in the classifieds and I defintely like the early GTRs more, something about an early silver one that looks so right.
Also, pontiac
I'm sure a 2009 997 turbo cost more than a base model '09 GTR. GTRs are a better buy in my opinion.
The percentage of depreciation that a GT-R has gone through is in line with a 997 Turbo is what he's saying. And to answer my WYR, I'd go with the Buick. Comfortable, quiet nicely styled sedan with a V6 that has nice low end torque, that's a car I like.![]()
I get that it offers more performance for the price, but what I am seeing is sort of excessive. People end up being obsessed with modding them and end up throwing 50K+ to just use them as weekend racers (I'm talking straight line stuff here mostly). Might as well use the 50K to buy an EVO and mod the hell out of it if you just want to go fast.Right, but I'm explaining to him why he has been seeing more GTRs on the road rather than 911s. People are starting to realize that the GTR is a better buy and people are looking for something a little bit different.
^ Hmm, a C5 RS6 and a W211 E55? Neither, both are A/T, sedans, and too sterile for my liking...2003 Audi RS6
or
2004 Mercedes Benz E55 AMG
^ Neither. In Vegas, the 458 is practically everywhere and so synonimous, ugh! The McDiddy though (as oppose the McDaddy F1), a better everyday car overall...but it has that GT-R Syndrome on which it aims to be perfect at the expense of fun to drive factor. I'd still pick the Gallardo LP550-2 M/T or a R8 5.2 M/T.Ferrari 458 Italia
Or
McLaren MP4-12C?
^ I've always like the Intrigue ever since it came out. It has that certain balance that captivates me, not too bland (Taurus), too outlandish (Grand Am), and it doesn't make you like an AARP member (Century).
New one, Midsized Mediocrity:
Buick Century
Ford Taurus
Pontiac Grand Am
Oldsmobile Intrigue