Would you rather?

  • Thread starter Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 1,274,337 views
Murcie_LP640
In a similar manner, the 240SX isn't sold where I am. For that reason price is irrelevant. Also the outputs are irrelevant because it's incredibly highly unlikely these cars are going to be left stock. The SR20 has a superior aftermarket.
Click to expand...
Even then, they would still be fairly similar. Obviously price will vary depending on where you're from.
 
Shelby

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$500 1991 BMW 850I
Class-C-24-Hours-of-LeMons-Arse-Freeze-626x426.jpg


OR

$500 1993 Mazda RX-7
24-Hours-of-LeMons-North-Dallas-Hooptie-Winners-Organizers-Choice-2-626x426.jpg
 
The RX-7, because it's less painful to see it in such conditions. But still, it does look really fun to drive in that picture.
 
I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me.

640px-Honda-Civic-DX-hatch.jpg

Civic DX

or

640px-Nissan_240SX_--_03-16-2012.JPG

240SX SE

or

2759760001_large.jpg

Eclipse RS
 
Last edited:
BMW and 240SX.
 
Jaguar XJ220 S TWR
896097.jpg



or


Jaguar XJR-15
news-orig-878236038.jpg
 
Last edited:
XJ220. That XJR thing is ugly.
 
RX-7, Eclipse, XJ220.
 
Merkur XR4Ti vs. Chevrolet Citation X-11 vs. Shelby CSX - Merkur, although it was close between the Shelby and the Merkur.

Results:
1. Merkur XR4Ti
2. Shelby CSX
3. Chevrolet Citation X-11

BMW 850i vs. Mazda RX-7 - RX-7, it would be cheaper to restore.

Honda Civic DX vs. Nissan 240SX SE vs. Mitsubishi Eclipse RS - Eclipse, these actually look pretty nice.

Results:
1. Mitsubishi Eclipse
2. Nissan 240SX SE
3. Honda Civic DX

Jaguar XJ220 TWR vs. Jaguar XJR-15 - XJ220, although the XJ220 TWR and the XJR-15 are ugly.
 
How dare you say the xj220 is ugly.
 
I'll take the 1962 Superamerica, because it's by far the best looking.

I'll take the Merkur XR4Ti, because it's Ash Upton's car.

I'll take the 850, because, regardless of condition, it's a BMW 8-Series.

I'll take the Civic, because I like early 90s Civics.

I'll take XJR-15, because the TWR S appears to have had some hideous body kit fitted to it by some rich chav.
 
Gotbeefboy564
How dare you say the xj220 is ugly.
Click to expand...

A little bit of trivia, “To be honest, I never really liked this car. A little over bloated. Not enough tension. Walkinshaw didn't like it hugely either. That's why he did the XJR 15.” - Ian Callum.
 
Unless I'm not looking at it like you are I see nothing ugly about it.
 
Gotbeefboy564
Unless I'm not looking at it like you are I see nothing ugly about it.
Click to expand...
They ruined the headlights by outlining them. And headlights make up a lot of the car's beauty to me (unless it has a nice rear.)
 
$500 cars

RX-7. It doesn't look that bad for the price.

Poor man's car

A bit harder but I'll take the Eclipse

Super-Jags

The TWR XJ220 looks way better and it's way faster
 
GranTurismo916
They ruined the headlights by outlining them. And headlights make up a lot of the car's beauty to me (unless it has a nice rear.)
Click to expand...
WHAT?! All because of silly headlight outlines that really aren't that noticable?! :crazy:

Also, for the 500 dollar cars, I would pick the BMW (I forgot about these before, oops). I would fix the 850 up and it would be awesome.
 
Back