Would you rather?

  • Thread starter Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 1,125,918 views
Ford because Ford.
Corvette.
Lexus because I know nothing about either.
Audi simply because its not an X5 or Volvo and looks better than the Mercedes.
Evo because its better looking and people don't expect you to put on ugly gold colored wheels on it.
Buick because its not a Fox body Mustang and its not a 4 cylinder.
McLaren. Its basically a cave compared to the Aventador in terms of technology, but its a much better car.
VW because I don't know anything about Peugeot.
Enzo, not explanation needed.
And on the last one, I don't really care. :lol:
 
Last edited:
Morris Marina vs Austin Allegro vs FSO Polonez - Polonez cause it's the only one that has RWD( that is what I found out after a quick search) but if they are all crap then I really not care.
 
1997 Volvo 850r Wagon
fs_904029.jpg



Saab 9-3 Aero 2002
saab-9-3-2002-02.jpg
 
Ferrari Enzo vs. Lamborghini Gallardo Balboni - I'll take the Enzo, they aren't comparable...

Morris Marina vs. Austin Allegro vs. FSO Polonez - I know nothing about them, but I'll pick the Marina for looks.

1997 Volvo 850R Wagon vs. 2002 Saab 9-3 Aero - I'll take the Saab because it's not a box wagon.

EDIT:

gamerdog6482
Never really seen a Volvo in this part of the US, so I'd take it to stump people on what it is.
Click to expand...
Where do you live, in the desert? :crazy: I see them all the time!
 
Volvo v SAAB- Well I guess the Volvo since it'd be more practical, plus I'm not sure how easy it'd be to get parts for a SAAB since they're out of business. Plus I've seen one of them go around a track and it was pretty impressive.
 
'97 Volvo 850R Wagon vs '02 Saab 9-3 Aero: I'll take the Aero. I just can't bring myself to like wagons. And, well, Volvos are probably the most bland Wagons I know. So, yeah...

Anyways.

Nissan Pulsar GTI-R

Nissan_Pulsar_GTI-R_3.JPG


vs.

Lancia Delta Integrale

800px-Lancia_Delta_Integrale_Evo_2_IMG_9403.jpg


That's a tough one for me. The Pulsar should be much more reliable and alll, but the Integrale is such a sexy car... Performance should be nearly identical, too. But, for me, the Integrale wins this, but only just.
 
Nissan Pulsar GTI-R vs. Lancia Delta Integrale - The Pulsar is another one of those cars that everyone "soups" up, but it becomes a ricer, so I'll take the Italian hatch.
 
Pulsar v Delta- Even though the Pulsar would probably cost less to own, the Delta is a pretty cool car so I'll go with that.
 
The Pulsar for me. Has to be an unmolested one though; I'd doubt people would mistake it for a Nissan Sunny but I'd love to think they would.

0-60 in a early 90's hot hatch in 5.6 seconds? Yes please.

Epic hot hatch.
 
Last edited:
Nissan Pulsar GTI-R vs Lancia Delta Integrale Lancia cause Group B.


Acura NSX vs Ferrari 348 GTS Ferrari cause everyone is going to say NSX
 

Latest Posts

Back