Would you rather?

  • Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 903,638 views
C-Type
1953-jaguar-c-type-racer-drivers-front.jpg




How i would spec it:

jaguar-c-type.png


Interior.png
 
Last edited:
How about a reverse (two wheels in front, one in back) trike? They look like fun.

Can-Am Ryker starting at $8,799. 50hp 600cc twin or 82hp 900 cc triple, automatic transmission.


Polaris Slingshot S starting at $19,999. 178hp or 203hp 2.0 liter inline 4, manual or automatic transmission.


Vanderhall Venice starting at $25,950. 180hp 1.5 liter turbo inline 4, 6-speed automatic transmission.


Triking Type 2, 3, and 4, starting at approx $27,000 (less if buying in kit form). 850cc to 1200cc Moto Guzzi V-Twin engines, manual transmission.


Morgan Three-Wheeler, $59,000 for final run of 33. 68hp or 82hp 2.0 liter V-Twin engine, 5-speed manual.

Triking.


1951-53 Jaguar C-Type
1953-jaguar-c-type-f3q.jpg


OR

1954-57 Jaguar D-Type

1956-jaguar-d-type-f3q-1024x345.jpg
C Type.

Tag yourself. I'm the green Dodge A-100 pickup, fourth row up, far left.

1968 Chrysler Corporation models

Uhhhh....How about all of them? :lol:
 
D-Type, been a fan of it since I first found out about it in PGR4 years ago.
Dodge A-100 I've always liked quirky cars like that.

McLaren F1 LM
73b5d3465c7a459f3516462ffc7e1bea.jpg


McLaren Senna LM
mclaren-senna-lm_100760140_h.jpg


McLaren P1 LM
0920738101f39be2f5d1dddcd372e53d.jpg


If I were a billionaire and could only choose one I would go with the F1 LM. The P1 LM while cool doesn't seem much different than a P1 GTR other than being street legal and the Senna LM is ugly IMO, if they made more of the body carbon I would probably find it more appealing.
 
Probably the Senna because it is so ridiculous looking and still a beautiful car.

Maybe when seeing both IRL I could go for the F1.
 

Latest Posts

Back