Would you rather?

  • Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 1,113,735 views
1990 CR-X Si vs 2012 CR-Z - CR-X for me, I like everything about it and I don't really like the CR-Z. I would keep the CR-X stock though.
 
CRX Si vs. CR-Z: Hmmmm....... Tough one, I'll take the CRX. I love the CRZ, reminds me of the CRX and I like the modified ones.


But the CRX is also known as the "pocket rocket", since there's are some CRXs that give the other tuners and muscle cars a run for their money ;). Soo, give me a CRX and a B18 or better, a JDM K20 engine and let me think on creating a beast :mischievous:👍.
 
2013-mazda-mx-5-9_600x0w.jpg

2013 Mazda MX-5

OR

1993 Nissan 300ZX
1993-nissan-300zx.jpg
 
The 300ZX all the way!!!! :D

Make mine with the VG30DETT with T-Tops please!!

I can't wait to find one soon.
 
JER_CREST
if you get the right on you can take 3 friends along with you.
Click to expand...

Yep, gotta love the 2+2 cars with the targa/T-tops of the 80's and the 90's. :D But I know that that version of the Z32 was a rarer one that the two seater one, but not a rare compared to the convertible Z32.
 
2013 Mazda MX-5 OR 1993 Nissan 300ZX - I'll take the the MX-5 please. Unless i had a Diablo that needed replacement headlights.
 
JER_CREST
if you get the right on you can take 3 friends along with you.
Click to expand...

If they have no legs, possibly. I was looking at a 300ZX 2+2 for this reason and there may be room back there for one person if they put their feet up on your back seats and form a foetal position.

I'd probably take the MX-5 on the basis that it's a sports car rather than a GT car and it's a hell of a lot newer.
 
-> ...
TriumphTT900
new one fellas

1990 CR-X Si

v.

2012 CR-Z
Click to expand...
^ Huh!? Is this a comparison!? :odd:

-> The CR-Z is my 4th least favorite of all Honda's current lineup in a Global perspective (Crosstour is 1st, 2nd gen RDX is 2nd, and ZDX is 3rd)!! Hell, I'd even take the StepWGN over this waste of engineering.

-> While the CR-X is one of Honda's best cars, a polar opposite to the CR-Z. Light, nimble, economical, and most of all FUN to drive; unlike the CR-Z on which posseses none of those traits.

^ I pick the CR-X, easy!

Watt2159
2013 Mazda MX-5

OR

1993 Nissan 300ZX
Click to expand...
^ Even if its my favorite NC Miata (the PHRT/Roadster Coupe).

-> My heart belongs to the boost-happy, lambo-eyed, Motor Trend's Import Car of the Year in 1990, and a 10 Best Car for Car and Driver 7 years in a row; the 300ZX! I, one of the few agrees with Chris Harris here: 'the MX-5/Miata is a great roadster, but its not a sports car' IN STOCK FORM! ;)
 
-> New one!

NA1 NSX OR R33 GT-R

391666_414104551986070_87073685_n.jpg


(BONUS: 1st-gen Tacoma OR 1st-gen Sienna {see behind the 1st two})

:D
 
1990 CR-X Si vs. 2012 CR-Z Honestly I'm attracted to the Japanese style late 80s-90s cars, but I'll take the CR-Z here. :sly:

2013 Mazda MX-5 vs. 1993 Nissan 300ZX -Same thing I said up there. I'm going with the new.

NA1 NSX vs. R33 GT-R - NSX because NSX. (Only if it has the stock rims though :D)

BONUS: 1st-gen Tacoma vs. 1st-gen Sienna - Tacoma because this.
 
Acura/Honda NSX NA1 vs. Nissan Skyline GTR BCNR33: Another toughie?! I always loved the R33 and NA1 NSX, but give me BOTH!!! :D

Tacoma all the way! :D
 
NSX vs. R33..

I love both cars but I would have to go with the R33. Mainly because a Skyline is tougher to find here than an NSX.
 

Latest Posts

Back