Would you rather?

  • Thread starter Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 1,114,075 views
-> ...
TriumphTT900
new one

Subaru Impreza WRX STi 22B Coupe

Mitsubishi Lancer Evo V
Click to expand...
^ My favorite Evo and my favorite STi. What to do, what to do...oh I know! I'd get BOTH! :crazy:

-> Another one, the Lambo's:

Countach 5000QV vs. Reventon Coupe
423769_10151386395720898_718793748_n.jpg


:sly:
 
JAHHAJ
I love both the Evo 5 is the best Evo ever in my opinion but, because of the rarity I will go for the Subie.
Click to expand...

This

Countach 5000QV vs. Reventon Coupe

Il take the countach because of it Amazing body lines. Who in the world would chose the newer one.
 
spikeyhairdude
This

Countach 5000QV vs. Reventon Coupe

Il take the countach because of it Amazing body lines. Who in the world would chose the newer one.
Click to expand...

The reventon because it's a expensive aventador
 
Last edited:
Mitsubishi, because Tommi Mäkinen is one of my favorite racers, and the Evo V is my favorite of the ten.

Countach, because it was made when Lambo wasn't obsessed with chasing fads, or doing publicity stunts to sell their cars.
 
Countach, and this was a dead easy one.

I had a die-cast model of it in my childhood, it is the first thing I ever associated with the term supercar.
 
Subaru Impreza WRX 22B STi vs. Mitsubishi Lan Evolution V: Ugh, tough choice here..... I'll take both! :D

Lamo Countash vs. Reventon: Ummmm......... I like both, but give me the Countash! I always loved that car since I was a kid and I can't get enough of that V12. :D
 
Monte Carlo vs. Monte Carlo vs. Grand National: The Grand National. Would probably be the rarest choice around here, too.

CR-X vs. CR-Z: I'll take the CR-Z. It may be a hybrid, but I'd still rather have that one... Should be worth a fair bit more, too.

'13 MX-5 vs. '93 300ZX: I'd go with the Z. It's much more of a sports car, really - and it's widely considered to be a good car all around, from what I've heard.

NA1 NSX vs. R33 GT-R: I'll take the NSX. It's both the nicer car (in my opinion) and available as a left hand driven vehicle.

'66 GTO vs. '06 GTO: I'd go with the classic one. I prefer the look of the '65, but who cares? It's still the grandfather of muscle cars.

R390 vs. GT-One: The R390, please. It looks like it's a much better road car, in my opinion. It's obviously hard to tell from jsut the looks, but it looks so much more like a road car, compared to the GT-One.

Bricklin vs. DeLorean: DeLorean. I could at least sell that thing for quite a bit of cash, I'd assume. Also, the Bricklin is named 'Savety Vehicle', how lame is that? :lol:

22B vs. regular Lan Evo 5: Well, there were only 424 22Bs made, so I'd much rather pick the much, much rarer Subaru. Evo 5s are dime a dozen, in comparison. :lol:

Countach vs. Reventon: I'd rather have the Reventon. It, in my opinion, looks better, it performs better and it's likely more comfortable. Plus, more valuable, to boot. I'll be honest, I never actually liked the body lines of the Countach.

3000GT VR4 vs. Steallth R/T: Well, it'd have to be the Mitsubishi, I guess. It's basically the original, so why bother with the re-badged knock-off? :lol:

But, guys? Remember what the mods told us? To stick to what the thread is about, which isn't just picking a favourite from two cars?

Oh well...

Brand New Porsche Cayman S: (~ 65.000 €)

P0505231.JPG


vs.

'93 911 (964) Turbo (~60,000 miles on it, ~65.000 €)

Porsche964Turbo36_1.jpg


964 for me.
 
Last edited:
3000GT is miles over the Stealth. Oh sure, they're the same thing, but the 3000GT is a Mitsu. And that's all that matters, honest. :p

I'd take the 964 over the Cayman just because of how it looks. Beats the modern incarnations over and over again.
 
I'd take a 3000 because dodge cant make a car worth a damn.. the stealth has a similar shell and is put on a similar chassis but everything else doge tried to do failed..

id take a 911 simply because of nostalgia.
 
The 964, only because it was a Turbo.
It wasn't an easy decision for me as I haven't really preferred the older 911's - apart from the next gen 993...which I would buy/marry/etc if I could. :lol:

And it's nice to see that someone's actually sticking to the rules. :sly: :lol:
 
Luminis
Monte Carlo vs. Monte Carlo vs. Grand National: The Grand National. Would probably be the rarest choice around here, too.

CR-X vs. CR-Z: I'll take the CR-Z. It may be a hybrid, but I'd still rather have that one... Should be worth a fair bit more, too.

'13 MX-5 vs. '93 300ZX: I'd go with the Z. It's much more of a sports car, really - and it's widely considered to be a good car all around, from what I've heard.

NA1 NSX vs. R33 GT-R: I'll take the NSX. It's both the nicer car (in my opinion) and available as a left hand driven vehicle.

'66 GTO vs. '06 GTO: I'd go with the classic one. I prefer the look of the '65, but who cares? It's still the grandfather of muscle cars.

R390 vs. GT-One: The R390, please. It looks like it's a much better road car, in my opinion. It's obviously hard to tell from jsut the looks, but it looks so much more like a road car, compared to the GT-One.

Bricklin vs. DeLorean: DeLorean. I could at least sell that thing for quite a bit of cash, I'd assume. Also, the Bricklin is named 'Savety Vehicle', how lame is that? :lol:

22B vs. regular Lan Evo 5: Well, there were only 424 22Bs made, so I'd much rather pick the much, much rarer Subaru. Evo 5s are dime a dozen, in comparison. :lol:

Countach vs. Reventon: I'd rather have the Reventon. It, in my opinion, looks better, it performs better and it's likely more comfortable. Plus, more valuable, to boot. I'll be honest, I never actually liked the body lines of the Countach.

3000GT VR4 vs. Steallth R/T: Well, it'd have to be the Mitsubishi, I guess. It's basically the original, so why bother with the re-badged knock-off? :lol:

But, guys? Remember what the mods told us? To stick to what the thread is about, which isn't just picking a favourite from two cars?

Oh well...

Brand New Porsche Cayman S: (~ 65.000 €)

vs.

'93 911 (964) Turbo (~60,000 miles on it, ~65.000 €)

964 for me.
Click to expand...

I agree
 
3000GT over the Stealth (in a perfect world though I'd rather have a Supra over the both of them...by miles) and 911 over Cayman.
 
Brand new 2013 Mustang GT? 39k$


Or a used C6 Corvette for around the same price?
p7201304.jpg
 
Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4 vs. Dodge Stealth: The 3KGT wins hands down!!! :D Been thinking of finding one also.

Porsche Cayman 981 vs. 911 Turbo 964: Hmmmm..... The 911 beats the Cayman anyday! :D And that's one of the most challenging 911s to drive right there before the 993 Turbo.

Mustang GT vs Corvette C6: Hmmm..... I'll take the Mustang GT and save up more cash and modify it into a 700hp beast. 👍
 
-> ...
TriumphTT900
new one

Mitsubishi 3000gt VR4

Dodge Stealth R/T twin-turbo
Click to expand...
^ The sleekness of the Stealth or the Gundam-esque 3000GT/GTO? I'd do...

gundam_style_14637.jpg


Luminis
Oh well...

Brand New Porsche Cayman S: (~ 65.000 €)

vs.

'93 911 (964) Turbo (~60,000 miles on it, ~65.000 €)
Click to expand...
^ I'd take the much-unloved 964 over the highly popular 987c, since the Cayman is everywhere in Vegas.

ND4SPD
Brand new 2013 Mustang GT? 39k$

Or a used C6 Corvette for around the same price?
Click to expand...
^ Easy, the Mustang 5.0. :)
 

Latest Posts

Back