Morgan vs. Can-Am: I'd much rather go with the classic Morgan. It's a bit quirky, but it's definitely more of a car than that... thing is. It also kinda reminds me of a Spitfire warbird
RX-7 vs. Civic: I'll take the FD all day, every day.
NA Miata vs. S2000: How would you get a brand new NA? They're almost twenty years old, by now. But I'd take the AP1, either way.
SW20 vs. S14: Well, that's a bit more difficult. But I'd take the MR2, if it's the Turbo.
What year is the Audi - if it's a recent one - I think you mean the A5?
Oh, and the comparison is supposed to be a new car against a used car with a similar value.
What year is the Audi - if it's a recent one - I think you mean the A5?
Oh, and the comparison is supposed to be a new car against a used car with a similar value.
Holy mother of god, none of them! Why? Because they are all insipid boxes of dull averageness that were poorly made and poorly engineered in their time, and are rubbish now.
M3 vs. A4 or A5 or whatever: The M3. Different class of car altogether. Audi's RS models would be more in line with BMW's M cars.
Strange, ugly American cars: None, thanks. I'll walk instead.
Anyways. Something a bit more in line with the intended purpose:
2007 Jaguar XJ8 4.2 (40,000 miles on it, about 26,000€, had almost all options ticked when it was bought. You'll also have about 2,000 bucks left in case something goes wrong)
vs.
BMW 316i (F30, new, about 28,000€, base trim)
I usually like BMWs, and the 316 would, in the long run, be the more economical and more practical choice. But damn, who could resist that V8 with almost 300HP and those looks? I'll have to take the sexy Jagsy.
S2000.
Hmm, I could mean the A5, but I'm sure there's an A4?
