Would you rather?

  • Thread starter Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 1,114,075 views
Toyota Avalon - MSRP $30,990-$39,650, 268 HP, 3,461 lbs
2013-Toyota-Avalon-front-view-around-corner.jpg


or

Hyundai Azera - MSRP $32,250, 293 HP, 3,605 lbs
2012-Hyundai-Azera-front-three-quarters.jpg


or

Cadillac ATS - MSRP $33,095 - $47,795, 202 HP, 4,414 lbs
2013-Cadillac-ATS-front-right-view-2.jpg


or

Chrysler 300 - MSRP $30,345 - $48,450, 292 hp, 5,100 lbs
chrysler300motown2013-01.jpg
 
I'd actually pick the Azera for my own, because the Cadillac is just an overpriced, underpowered, overweight American car.
 
I'd actually pick the Azera for my own, because the Cadillac is just an overpriced, underpowered, overweight American car.

How do you figure that? It only weighs 3,315lbs which is far lighter than most of the cars you posted. I'm not sure where you got the 4,414lb figure but it's wrong. The CTS doesn't even weigh that much even with AWD.

Also overpriced? It's $33,000 which about standard for a sport sedan. And underpowdered? The 2.0L turbo has 272hp, BMW's 2.0L turbo only puts out 240hp in the 328i.
 
-> ...
Toyota Avalon - MSRP $30,990-$39,650, 268 HP, 3,461 lbs

or

Hyundai Azera - MSRP $32,250, 293 HP, 3,605 lbs

or

Cadillac ATS - MSRP $33,095 - $47,795, 202 HP, 4,414 lbs

or

Chrysler 300 - MSRP $30,345 - $48,450, 292 hp, 5,100 lbs
^ Out of all of those choices, I'd pick the ATS. Simply because, manual tranmission.
 
Sport Sedans: Hmmmm..... I'll take the ATS and the 300 SRT-8 @ $48,495. Can't lose with both cars. ;)
 
Where in earth did you get the weights of the ATS and 300? Because they do not weigh 4400 and 5100lbs.....
 
I'd actually pick the Azera for my own, because the Cadillac is just an overpriced, underpowered, overweight American car.

I'm gonna have to call you out here, it's actually lighter and more dynamic than a BMW 3 series while its engine is as powerful yet despite having a better interior imo it undercuts the 3 series by alot of $$.

I don't know where the heck you got 4400lbs from....

For the record I choose the ATS.
 
I'll take the Chrysler again because it's the most intimidating to look at and it's the only one of the four sold in the UK.
 
I'll have the ATS. If for some reason I couldn't have that, I would be pretty much just as happy with the 300.
 
Am I the only one that gets annoyed by people choosing both cars or all cars in a comparison? The whole point of this thread is to decide which car you want, not if you'd rather have both or neither.

It annoys me too. It's Would you Rather, not lol don't worry you can just choose everything yay. :indiff:

I've missed a lot!

VXR VS Mazdaspeed VS ST220 VS 330i

We can get rid of the Vauxhall off the bat because that bland, grey oasis of an interior is just too blah for me, and I like a lot of blah cars. The Mazdaspeed 6 is a really neat car, but there's something about the first generation Mazda 6 that doesn't particularly interest me. The Mondeo's a nice looking car inside and out, and I bet it'd be fun in ST guise, but the problem is that the 330i exists. The Bimmer's got the nicest interior, looks the most mature inside and out of the group, and those wheels are so good.

Kombi VS UAZ

I'll take the Volkswagen, as I've never heard of the latter.

3-Wheelers

I'll take the Morgan. It's the coolest looking, and it's the only one I've heard of.

Wrangler VS Defender

The Wrangler's a post facelift one, which means it has the very durable, but just awful interior. If it were the facelift model with the nice interior and the Pentastar engine, the choice would be a lot easier. But I'd still choose the Jeep.

ZR1 VS Z06

I'll take the ZR1, because of reasons.

S60 VS SRT8

The Chrysler's a nice car, but the interior's kinda blah. Still, it's a vast improvement over the Dollar Store-grade plastic hell that was the last 300's interior. The Volvo's got the upper hand on the interior, especially those seats. It's also just a more appealing car to me, but I'm not sure why. Volvos in general have become appealing to me lately. If it were blacked out and had a bigger turbo and a couple other performance goodies, I bet it'd be a really fun sleeper.

Avalon VS Azera VS ATS VS 300

Like everyone else is so eager to point out, the weight on the ATS and 300 is just blatantly wrong. Anyways, I can throw the Azera out off the bat because I just don't like the uber-swoopy interior design. It doesn't scream expensive. The new Avalon sure looks good inside and out, and it only weighs 3400 lbs. That's pretty impressive for a modern car. But it's not rear wheel drive like the ATS, so it's out. The ATS I sat in felt pretty decent inside, but it had nothing on the XTS. Still, it's a nice looking car, it's fast with the two other engines, and is pretty good inside.
 
Genesis for me. It's RWD and it almost came over to the UK in it's current generation.
 
Initially I thought about making this a Scion FR-S vs. Hyundai Genesis Coupe but figured most people would choose the FR-S. So I decided to put the Genesis coupe against the Civic Si coupe because the Civic Si has a huge fan base. It's kind of interesting to see that most people choose the car with the least fan base.
 

Latest Posts

Back