Would you rather?

  • Thread starter Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 1,114,190 views
-> ...
Initially I thought about making this a Scion FR-S vs. Hyundai Genesis Coupe but figured most people would choose the FR-S. So I decided to put the Genesis coupe against the Civic Si coupe because the Civic Si has a huge fan base. It's kind of interesting to see that most people choose the car with the least fan base.
^ I would've pick the GenCoupe still...I like most of the Scion's lineup, I just don't like the way they badge "FR-S" instead of "aE". And the 9th Civic is just fail.
 
Did they ever fix the grossly under powered 2.0T in the Genesis? I drove one a couple years back and it was painfully slow. I haven't driven the latest generation of the Si, but the last generation wasn't all that bad.
 
Did they ever fix the grossly under powered 2.0T in the Genesis? I drove one a couple years back and it was painfully slow. I haven't driven the latest generation of the Si, but the last generation wasn't all that bad.

Yeah, they upped the power to 274 bhp. However, it does sound like it's pretty peaky, with some turbo lag.
 
Hyundai Genesis Coupe vs. Honda Civic Si 9th gen: The Genesis wins hands down! But I'll go with the 3.8L and add a turbo setup to it. 👍
 
2013 Kia Forte Coupe Koup EX (6-speed manual) MSRP: $17,400
2013_kia_forte_coupe_koup-sx_fq_oem_2_500.jpg


OR

2013 Hyundai Veloster Hatchback (6-speed manual/Non-Turbo) MSRP: $17,600
2013_hyundai_veloster_2dr-hatchback_base_fq_oem_17_500.jpg
 
I'll take the Veloster since the UK doesn't get the Forte. I also don't like Kias in general.
 
I'd probably take the Kia, but I'm not to keen on either of them.

1976 Ford Granada 2-Door 5.8L V8

10685_25582.jpg




vs



1981 Pontiac Le Mans 5.7L V8

1981-pontiac-le-mans-coupe_5357180.jpg
 
2013 Volkswagen Tiguan (6-speed manual/FWD) MSRP: $22,995
2012_volkswagen_tiguan_4dr-suv_sel_fq_oem_4_500.jpg


or

2013 Nissan Juke Nismo msrp: $22,990
2013_nissan_juke_4dr-hatchback_nismo_fq_oem_3_500.jpg
 
The Veloster non-turbo was painful to drive. Hyundai made a car that looked pretty funky and cool and then forgot to give it any power. The turbo is supposed to be fun, but the non-turbo not so much. I'd have to go with the Forte, it feels exactly like a Honda Civic is just about every way.

The Juke is hideous and it wasn't very nice to drive, plus the interior was god-awful. I'd go with the Tiguan, but unfortunately VW didn't put the DSG in it for some reason I can't seem to remember.
 
Veloster vs Forte

I quite like the Veloster but like Joey said it's pretty under powered. For that reason alone I think I would go for the Forte, it looks nicer as well.

Tiguan vs Juke.

Juke. No ifs or buts. It's pretty refreshing to see a car that actually looks different these days. Plus I like the styling on the Nismo model even more, I've seen one in the wild and it looks really good.
 
Tiguan is my choice. The Juke looks like a ghastly mutant insect and the Nismo version is just completely pointless.
 
Forte vs. Volester: Hmmmm, I'll take the Volester and add a twin turbo setup. ;)

Ford vs. Pontiac: I'll have that Le Mans coupe and rebuild the chassis for either a LS3 or a LSA from a ZL1. ;)

VW vs. Nissan: I'll take the Juke. Even though it's hideous, but I kinda like the Nismo version of the weird looking crossover.
 
Forte vs. Veloster: I'd choose the Veloster. 4 doors, looks better (IMO), and isn't a Kia.

Ford vs. Pontiac: I definitely don't like the part-vinyl roof on the Ford (and it really doesn't help that it's red). I hate them on all cars, no matter what it is. I don't really like the 351, but despite the half vinyl roof, I really like the way the Ford looks, the Pontiac just looks weird to me. I think I'll go with the Ford. It looks more like an actual classic whereas the Pontiac looks like something that would be wearing 26" rimz and hydraulics.

Juke vs. Tiguan: I'll have the Juke. The VW just looks so boring, whether it is or isn't.
 
-> ...
2013 Kia Forte Coupe Koup EX (6-speed manual) MSRP: $17,400

OR

2013 Hyundai Veloster Hatchback (6-speed manual/Non-Turbo) MSRP: $17,600
^ If only the Velo had the Forte SX engine it would be sweet. I have driven the Velo but not the Forte. And I keep on hearing the VeloTurbo is pretty much fun. Plus I always prefer hatches over coupes. So I'd pick neither. And for the price, I'd rather get a CPO'ed/left over 2013 Scion tC. Since the Scion has the traits of both of these cars!


1976 Ford Granada 2-Door 5.8L V8

vs

1981 Pontiac Le Mans 5.7L V8
^ I'd pick the Pontiac. I just don't see them on the road in Vegas at all!!!


2013 Volkswagen Tiguan S (6-speed manual/FWD) MSRP: $22,995

or

2013 Nissan Juke Nismo msrp: $22,990
^ I pick neither. A 2WD lifted CUV is always a no-buy from me, I want my 2007 Forester 2.5XT or a previous-gen Outback 2.5XT, both have AWD & 5M/T!!! Although the Tiguan has a sense of quality towards it and better daily-driving balance. The Juke is like an unfinished mess of a car, coming from a guy who like the VehiCross, the Element, & the SS-R.
 
but unfortunately VW didn't put the DSG in it for some reason I can't seem to remember.

For me, thanks to the recent giant recall across the VAG here I feel it's rather fortunate they didn't. I'd definitely take the Tiguan.
 
Genesis VS Civic

The updated Civic's certainly an improvement over the '12, but it's no match for old eighth generation model. That car was just perfection. I still like the '13 a whole lot, and I'll go against everyone else here by choosing it over the Genesis. Sure the Hyundai's rear wheel drive and a lot more powerful, but I really like Civics (except for the seventh gen- just...no) and the newest iteration is no exception. It won't be as exciting as the last one now that it has the larger engine with the lower redline, and it's certainly not as nice to look at. To be honest, I like the old interior better too. But, I still like it, and while it may not be my first choice among different competitors, I'll take it over the Genesis.

Forte VS Veloster

I've always liked the Forte Koup, even with its misspelled name (because eff English that's why) and pretty meh interior. It's a nice looking car, and the performance is alright, on par with the Scion tC. I'd prefer the Scion though, to be honest. The Veloster's a pretty sharp looking car on the outside, and Hyundai's swoopy interior design language (which I don't always like) looks good in this iteration. The Forte was a decent car when it came out in 2010, but the competition quickly overtook it, and just three years later it's already an also-ran in the class. The Veloster is only two years newer in design, but it's a big leap forward, thanks to Hyundai-Kia's constant leaps and bounds in their evolution. I'll take the Veloster, even if it is a snoozer in base trim, it could be livened up a bit with some modz yo, right?

Granada VS Le Mans

Eh, I'll take the Pontiac, and not because it's just donkalicious. It's a couple years more advanced than the Ford and looks a bit better. It's also on a newer platform, and parts are surely abundant, seeing as like all GM cars at the time, the Pontiac had plenty of platform cousins.

Tiguan VS Puke Joke Juke

I've never been a fan of the Tiguan. It's just so dull inside and out, and there doesn't really seem to be any outstanding qualities about it, other than its name, which is half Tiger and half Iguan. But the Nissan's just awful. It's just so ugly. Sure it's different like its fans (all five of them) are quick to point out, but my god did they have to make it so fugly? The interior's not so good either. The Nismo version and the Juke-R are just pointless. Boring trumps ghastly, so I'll take the Tiguan.

Next up: cars that have torquesteer.

Buick Park Avenue Ultra (3.8 V6, 240 horsepower, 280 lb-ft of torque)

Buick-Park_Avenue_2005_1600x1200_wallpaper_01.jpg


Pontiac Bonneville GXP (4.6 V8, 275 horsepower, 300 lb-ft of torque)

2004_pontiac_bonneville_gxp-pic-64163.jpeg


Chevrolet Impala SS (3.8 V6, 240 horsepower, 280 lb-ft of torque)

2004_chevrolet_impala_ss-pic-6686547445454243284.jpeg


Oldsmobile Aurora (4.0 V8, 250 horsepower, 260 lb-ft of torque)

2nd_gen_Oldsmobile_Aurora.jpg


Cadillac Seville STS (4.6 V8, 300 horsepower, 290 lb-ft of torque)

2002_cadillac_seville_sts-pic-87875430604357981.jpeg
 
Neither of those. If I wanted mad torquesteer, I'd buy the previous generation Astra VXR or a Mk 1 or Mk 2 Focus RS.
 
-> ...
Next up: cars that have torquesteer.

Buick Park Avenue Ultra (3.8 V6, 240 horsepower, 280 lb-ft of torque)

Pontiac Bonneville GXP (4.6 V8, 275 horsepower, 300 lb-ft of torque)

Chevrolet Impala SS (3.8 V6, 240 horsepower, 280 lb-ft of torque)

Oldsmobile Aurora (4.0 V8, 250 horsepower, 260 lb-ft of torque)

Cadillac Seville STS (4.6 V8, 300 horsepower, 290 lb-ft of torque)
^ If I want hillarious understeer, I'd get the '06 Vibe GT. To sum it up:

Buick - Instant country club cruiser and sea sickness-inducing suspension.

Pontiac - Looks like bonkers, an understeer to match, and good looker for what it is! But the Grand Prix GXP is a better car overall.

Chevy - No matter if it is this version or its SS V8 spec, its still belongs to Avis, Hertz, Budget, & Enterprise lots than any (privates household) driveway.

Olds - Compared to its last-gen, which is cleaner, sleeker, and more distinctive. While this one is a mess. It looks like its destined to go to Europe (given w/ its extra rear tail lights/lamps) but changes its mind instead.

Caddy - Although handsome, sleeper/Q-ship factor, and a Global Car is a plus (but it performed poorly). That pic you showed looks like it's prepped for a AARP (pentioners) convention!

^ Out of all of them? I'd pick both the GXP & the STS. But for the same money, I'd go get the GTO 6.0. (sorry for the off-topic)
 
Pontiac for me. Easily the most visually pleasing of the bunch.
 
Back