- 8,481
- P_Balance
Not to mention very slow.They will either have a billion miles on them or be through the roof expensive. Those things hold their value real well, at least in this state.
Not to mention very slow.They will either have a billion miles on them or be through the roof expensive. Those things hold their value real well, at least in this state.
If you see a G20 DRIVE IT! Those are such fantastic little cars.
Not to mention very slow.
Diesel VWs also don't handle particularly well, before you site the Mini as an example.They aren't that slow. Remember speed and power aren't everything.
They aren't quicker than I think. My friend from school had one with a custom exhaust (no mufflers, just straight pipe) and an intake, and my car was a bit faster than his in completely stock form.They're actually quicker than you think. I drove a late-model TDI, the year before they bumped up the power to an even 100, and it managed to scoot along pretty well with the slushbox it had. Don't get me wrong, my old Jetta was certainly faster, but when this sucker will cruise at 40 MPG all day, thats a bonus.
That means my Civic isn't that slow......They aren't that slow. Remember speed and power aren't everything.
👍Diesel VWs also don't handle particularly well, before you site the Mini as an example.
That means my Civic isn't that slow......
He was making fun of his own car, tard.Never said it was, it's an economy car yes but that doesn't make it slow.
**Also where the hell did I mention the Mini at?
The civic is pretty slow IMO.Never said it was, it's an economy car yes but that doesn't make it slow.
**Also where the hell did I mention the Mini at?
RE: what's wrong with the "basic" RSX? It's only 0,6 to 1 second slower to 60 mph. Granted, it'd be nice to have all 200 ponies, but you're almost never going to use that speed on the road, so you're not going to miss it at all... not unless you drive said RSX back to back with some guy's Type S.
Anyway... "speed" is relative. In traffic, you'll likely get more "kick" out of another turbodiesel than you will out of a high-strung, 200 hp screamer.
@ Keef: Hey, if they were about $10K cheaper, I'd consider it!
On a similar note, I came across an RSX for $10K recently, but the mileage was a bit higher than I'd like, so I dunno. I do like the look/handling of the cars, but I don't want to be a massive tool not having the Type-S car.
EDIT:
The VW hunt just got more interesting:
The local VW shop has some really sweet deals, and they're on average about $2000 cheaper than the others I've been seeing around town. I'm going to go have a look/chat tomorrow and see where it gets me. I may be able to save myself a lot of money going this route...
Awww... c'mon... the G20 has such a nice engine... and it's got IRS, too... something I wish they'd kept on the Sentra...
But at this point in time... 10k for such an old car... mmmmmmm.... errh...
---
RE: what's wrong with the "basic" RSX? It's only 0,6 to 1 second slower to 60 mph. Granted, it'd be nice to have all 200 ponies, but you're almost never going to use that speed on the road, so you're not going to miss it at all... not unless you drive said RSX back to back with some guy's Type S.
Anyway... "speed" is relative. In traffic, you'll likely get more "kick" out of another turbodiesel than you will out of a high-strung, 200 hp screamer.
*shrugs* Suspension isn't as good? Worse tires
You are practically singling out the Jetta.All of our suggestions are in vain unless it is a Jetta. At least consider the Passat estate--its super sexy in black or green.
![]()
I do like that RSX, but the mileage is exceptionally high it seems.
On a similar note, I came across an RSX for $10K recently, but the mileage was a bit higher than I'd like, so I dunno. I do like the look/handling of the cars, but I don't want to be a massive tool not having the Type-S car.
I don't want to be overly-committed to something that will be worth nothing by the time my financing is up...