What movies have you seen lately? Now with reviews!Movies 

  • Thread starter Thread starter scentedsoap
  • 8,270 comments
  • 551,783 views
Ahh, that explains a lot... but not really. Thanks for the b-day wishes :D

Happy Birthday, TS!

On a thread related note...

lost-highway.jpg


Lost Highway

Directed by: David Lynch
Written by: David Lynch and Barry Gifford


I have seen this movie before (a few times actually), but it's been a few years. So, I thought I would "subject" my girlfriend to it, since she has never seen a David Lynch film. It was between this, Mullholand Dr. and Eraserhead. I wasn't about to put her through Eraserhead quite yet.

Anyway, this film is not for everyone. Lets get that out of the way first and foremost. That being said, it's a brilliant jaunt through a moment in the life of an individual with a few problems lets just say. ;) I won't spoil the story for those who either haven't watched it, or haven't figured it out yet. Suffice it to say, not everything is as it seems. If you like films that are a bit different, and make you use that big squishy pink thing between your ears, give it a shot. Otherwise, steer clear...

7.8/10




;)
 
Last edited:
That's my summary on any David Lynch movie :lol:

I can understand that completely.

However, if you have seen a few of his films, you start to understand how he writes/directs. I've never had much problem figuring out his films (well, as much as one can...lol) as I have seen enough of them to work out how he gets his point across. Lost Highway is one of the easiest, in my opinion, which is why I started Sarah off with it, instead of Mulholland Dr. or Eraserhead.

There actually is a very simple explanation for Lost Highway. It's the subject itself that denotes the basic method for telling the story. It's a tough subject to try and put to film, in regards to visuals/time lines. All in all I think he did an amazing job.



;)
 
RUI
Have you seen Elephant Man

or

The Straight Story?

Elephant Man, yes... I'll admit that one wasn't bad or hard to understand. neither was Dune. Haven't seen The Straight Story; but even you've got to admit Elephant Man and Dune are the most un-Lynch-esque of his work.
 
I liked Dune a lot when I was young... Wonder how it would be to watch now... I think its been 15+ years since I saw it last...
 
I liked Dune a lot when I was young... Wonder how it would be to watch now... I think its been 15+ years since I saw it last...

I disliked Dune when i was a kid - i guess it just wasn't Star Wars. I'd quite like to see it now with a slightly more open mind, to see what i really think of it.

Actually, i've just remembered that i have a unwatched copy of Dune on DVD that came free with a Sunday newspaper, i'll have to watch it sometime soon.
 
I disliked Dune when i was a kid - i guess it just wasn't Star Wars. I'd quite like to see it now with a slightly more open mind, to see what i really think of it.

Actually, i've just remembered that i have a unwatched copy of Dune on DVD that came free with a Sunday newspaper, i'll have to watch it sometime soon.

Interesting... Im going to try and see if I can get a copy as well... After I posted that I was really in the mood to see it again... I hope it doesnt back fire though.... :)
 
Actually, i've just remembered that i have a unwatched copy of Dune on DVD that came free with a Sunday newspaper, i'll have to watch it sometime soon.

That's awesome... our newspaper usually comes with cassette tapes of Chavez' and Castro's speeches.
 
Elephant Man, yes... I'll admit that one wasn't bad or hard to understand. neither was Dune. Haven't seen The Straight Story; but even you've got to admit Elephant Man and Dune are the most un-Lynch-esque of his work.

Straight Story is by far the least "Lynch-like" of his body of work. Although, I have always thought Dune was a bit of an embarrassment compared to the rest of his work. Say what you will about the story... The acting on the other hand is atrocious, in my opinion. However, I may be biased... I really cannot fathom why anyone would want to pay money to see anything with Kyle MacLachlan in it. He wasn't any better in Blue Velvet either. I've always questioned Lynch's fondness for that particular thespian.




;)
 
Last edited:
Actually, i've just remembered that i have a unwatched copy of Dune on DVD that came free with a Sunday newspaper, i'll have to watch it sometime soon.
Hehe, I got that too and have yet to watch it right through. From what I recall, it looks very dated, even compared to it's peers, e.g. Bladerunner, Alien etc., and as DR alluded to, it's pretty cheesy. Now you come to mention it, is it just my imagination, or has the whole free DVD with the weekend newspaper thing almost stopped? There was a time when you could get one every other week... I got "High Hopes" (Mike Leigh); "My Left Foot"; "What's Eating Gilbert Grape?"; "Donnie Darko", "Buena Vista Social Club", "The Last Emperor", "Dune" and "The Wicker Man" all free, plus a few I can't even remember...
 
Wow, you guys over the pond sure get some nice perks with your morning paper...

I'm lucky if I receive a free sample of detergent once a year.




;)
 
I am a huge fan of Dune. I have it on VHS and am impatiently waiting for it on Blu-Ray (April).

I tend to attempt to ignore the faults (MacLaughlin was horrible) as I love the story. And the sandworms. Nothing is as awesome as sandworms. I've seen the attempts at mini-series and everything else, but it just seems that while Lynch did not stay 100% faithful to the novel he managed to get the feel of the story across better than anyone else, and Frank Herbert himself said that he was happy with the film.

The biggest issue with how the film was done likely had a lot to do with the fact that David Lynch constantly had someone looking over his shoulder. He wasn't comfortable and was constantly trying to make stuff fit how the studio would want it in order to preserve as much of his ideas into the final cut as possible. I think that lack of comfort translated into the film. But when you look at the action and battle scenes it seems more natural (even if the effects are dated now). It was likely what Universal was wanting and the few places where Lynch and the studio weren't clashing.

I also recognize that the story, no matter how it is told, is not for everyone, which is why I don't go around suggesting the film or novel to people.

It is the one cult-geek thing I can cling to as not having been mainstreamed (although Watchmen will likely be back there in a few years, if it isn't already) and I am happy with that. Although, that may change soon.


And those looking to watch Dune again, be sure to avoid the Allen Smithee, or Extended version. It manages to remove the closest ties to the novel, and then add tons of unnecessary and boring information.


And now I need to go check out Pierre Morel's work to see if I think he can handle this project.
 
Elephant Man, yes... I'll admit that one wasn't bad or hard to understand. neither was Dune. Haven't seen The Straight Story; but even you've got to admit Elephant Man and Dune are the most un-Lynch-esque of his work.

You’re obviously right. :)
But even though I like most of his more archetypal works I think The Straight Story is a great film, a masterpiece of sorts (much because of Richard Farnsworth’s class acting). But if anyone considered it their favorite Lynch film that would probably mean they didn’t like David Lynch a lot!
 
RUI
You’re obviously right. :)
But even though I like most of his more archetypal works I think The Straight Story is a great film, a masterpiece of sorts (much because of Richard Farnsworth’s class acting). But if anyone considered it their favorite Lynch film that would probably mean they didn’t like David Lynch a lot!

Farnsworth was amazing. So was Sissy Spacek. Wonderful film.




;)
 
Avatar aka Smurfahontas In The Third Dimension

I finally saw Avatar last night after giving up on talking the missus into it and going with a mate. I'm sure everything has already been said before but it is a movie I have seen recently!

It was pretty much what I was expecting being over sentimental, longer than necessary and having a plot that felt a little insignificant but these are not terrible points for a CGI fantasy machine like this. This is the most accomplished CGI film I have seen, the visuals are truly stunning but are an evolutionary step rather than a game change.

This is the first of the current crop of films I have seen in 3D and this is where I was most disappointed. As a glasses wearer I find the solution of putting the 3D specs over your own to be pretty awkward and inadequate. I found the 3D effect was out of focus on objects at the far right or left of the screen and that by the end of the film I couldn't see the 3D effect any more. Whether this was just me or because I was wearing my own glasses I can't be sure but I'm not convinced by this 3D trend and doubt I'll be investing in it any time soon.

Overall I was very impressed with the film and could easily forgive it its faults...8/10
 
Chris mentioned "My Left Foot". My buddy kept insisting me I see that film, telling me how brilliant it is. I think I need to get that one on the Netflix queue.
I disliked Dune when i was a kid - i guess it just wasn't Star Wars. I'd quite like to see it now with a slightly more open mind, to see what i really think of it.

Actually, i've just remembered that i have a unwatched copy of Dune on DVD that came free with a Sunday newspaper, i'll have to watch it sometime soon.
Exactly, it just wasn't the Star Wars. We must be in a similar age group, you & I! :dopey: And that David Lynch-pervertedness in the film, I was still in fourth grade or something, it went right passed over my head. I definitely appreciated more the second time I saw it, I think it might have been just couple of years ago? And I think Chris is right on the film not aging that well. At least either on SFX, or cinematography, I think I got similar impression of the film. I still like it!
I really cannot fathom why anyone would want to pay money to see anything with Kyle MacLachlan in it. He wasn't any better in Blue Velvet either. I've always questioned Lynch's fondness for that particular thespian.
I like MacLachlan, too, but yeah, I always thought he was average at very best. Except in "The Hidden", I was too young to know any better. That film maybe why I have soft spot for him. :lol:
 
Pineapple Express (7/10)
pineapple-express1.jpg


I am torn a bit about this one. I liked the parody of "average guy becomes hero through a huge series of very improbable events" movies that this was. But I am definitely not a big fan of pot humor, so some of the jokes didn't work well for me because it was all done by stoners. Which leads me to James Franco. I hated his character, but he did a good job of it, as he reminded me of a guy I knew in high school. Seth Rogen was...Seth Rogen. I did like that this showed he was able to do physical humor and not just deliver dialog.

I think overall it is worth a watch, but I won't be wanting to watch it again.
 
^ I saw this a while ago and thought it had a few funny moments but was nothing special. Certainly not as good as Superbad and to a lesser extent Knocked Up.
Coincidence that Seth Rogen gets the pretty girl in most of films? I think not ;)
 
113806_3.jpg


Session 9 (Brad Anderson, 2001) -- Tensions rise within an asbestos cleaning crew as they work in an abandoned mental hospital with a horrific past that seems to be coming back... problem is, they don't manage to come back until the 60 minute mark or so. Until then it's just developing the characters in a non-scary manner. To me it seems the movie was thought out while visiting an abandoned psych hospital, and then decided to film it there, which is 80% of the suspense factor already.

The movie could've been better if it weren't plagued by ugly direction, poor acting, and a waste of what could have been a fantastically creepy setting. Also, David Caruso is in it, and though he's very unlike himself, at about the 60-minute mark he's back to his CSI Miami idiot self. 5/10
 
Star Wars Episode II: Attack Of The Clones.

7/10

Not as bad as I originally thought, and some very good scenes.
 
Up

I finally saw this yesterday. I wasn't expecting much even through all the hype but all I can say is I think the hype is justified. It's one of the best Disney/Pixar movies I've seen, although pretty much all Pixar stuff is good IMO. The pace was good, the plot was pleasantly childlike I guess you could call it and Doug the dog was hilarious. 8.5/10
 
113806_3.jpg


Session 9 (Brad Anderson, 2001) -- Tensions rise within an asbestos cleaning crew as they work in an abandoned mental hospital with a horrific past that seems to be coming back... problem is, they don't manage to come back until the 60 minute mark or so. Until then it's just developing the characters in a non-scary manner. To me it seems the movie was thought out while visiting an abandoned psych hospital, and then decided to film it there, which is 80% of the suspense factor already.

The movie could've been better if it weren't plagued by ugly direction, poor acting, and a waste of what could have been a fantastically creepy setting. Also, David Caruso is in it, and though he's very unlike himself, at about the 60-minute mark he's back to his CSI Miami idiot self. 5/10
I remember being somewhat disappointed, but I think it was pretty much a straight-to-dvd movie over here, so not by that much. :D I also remember that I did enjoy the atmosphere.

I saw a couple:

The Departed - This one was a rewatch. After seeing Infernal Affair, the original Hong Kong production, I've been wanting to watch Departed again to compare the two.

I still like the Infernal Affair better. Dare I say it....... I think both bosses in the Hong Kong version pwnd Martin Sheen and Jack Nicholson. I respect both Sheen & Nicholson, you could even say I'm a fan of both, but their Asian counterpart were better fit for their roles to say the least.

Still, I liked the Departed a lot more, this time around. Very, very good, I recommend it. "A-" I wonder what I gave it last time. :D

Zombieland - Loooooong time coming. I'm a big zombie flick fan.

This is possibly the most well rounded zombie movie I have ever seen. I compare this one to my favorite zombie flick of all time, Dawn of the Dead remake. Yes, the Non-Romero. For me though, the remake did have the critical shortcoming, which is the ending. I don't want to spoil anything for the people who haven't seen it, but they just couldn't leave it alone. So while they pretty much kill the sequel with that stupidity(IMO), Ving Rhames participate in that crap Day of the Dead remake. 👎👎 Again, not talking about Zombieland, Dawn of the Dead remake. Still a great, great film.

Sorry, I got little derailed there. :D As most of you I'm sure are aware, Zombieland is a comedy. But it still is a very solid zombie ........ maybe not horror, but horror-adventure? I thought the film was close to an perfection, which might not be saying much. Zombie flicks are easy to make, and it is pretty unbelievable how many bad one's are out there. Zombieland, with the strong biase "A"

P.S. Speedy, I do have that chambara flick on hand. It's next up!
 
I signed up for Netflix so I will probably become a regular contributor to this thread.

Baja 1000 Classic (2005)

This is basically a broadcast of the seconds running of the Baja 1000 with commentary from the director in place of the commercial breaks. He does have a couple good stories and gives some background on how they filmed the race in 1968. I would recommend it to anyone that enjoys racing documentaries. 6/10
 
When the Last Sword Is Drawn/壬生義士伝 - Got mixed reaction to this one. Quality film, no doubt. Probably the best modern samurai flick I've seen in a very long time. Acting, presentation, they are all good, all beautiful, but let me get to the things I had problems with:

1) Too damn long. It was actually quite gripping in the first half. Towards the end though, it's like they refuse to edit some of the scenes. I didn't like it.

2) His loyalty. First, it was to Nanbu. But when his family is nearing starvation, he declares that his loyalty is to his family. Then as Shinsengumi nears it's devastation, when Saito(his crazy rival) give him a way out to be with his family, he refuses. He's shot, critically injured, he begs his "BFF", the head of this Nanbu clan to take him back. He is told to commit seppuku, which is something a "loyal" samurai really shouldn't have to be reminded of. It's part of their code.

3) I think the characters were great. But I thought they should have went in more of their backgrounds. IMO, there were lot of films wasted on idle chat stuff, which could've been instead used on character/relationship building. They seemed hurried to me.

4) I almost forgot, his blabber mouth. Towards the end, the night he commits seppuku(or harakiri to some of you!), he goes on blah, blah, blah about love, family. From the western culture, it's sort of sweet. Even in Japan, I guess it's OK for the sensitive types. But samurai? No. Samurai is a doer. He is (supposed to be)hard. Samurai doesn't blabber, especially about love. It may be poetic, but I'm not gonna lie, my eyes were starting to roll as I fast forwarded some of it.

I really did like the plot twist at the end, though they gave it away bit too early, I thought. The film gets "A" on so many different stuff. And there are contents that only Japanese, or those only familiar with the Japanese culture could appreciate in this film. Netflix users give this one little over four out of five stars. Five individual reviews on rottentomatoes range from 80% to 100% rating. After points deducted from all the stuff I griped about, some very critical, I'd give this one "C+"
 
I've gotten a little behind on my reviews.

terminator-salvation-poster_370x491.png


Terminator Salvation 👍👎

Terminators 1 through 3 were all better than the Christian Bale version. Not because of Christian Bale, of course, he was perfectly acceptable in the film, but because the film was written badly.

In one of the first scenes in the film the resistance goes into a Skynet-built facility. I'm immediately wondering what a building built by robots for robots would look like. Surely it would be entirely function over style. I wondered whether the resistance guys would have trouble getting in since there would obviously be no doors or stairs (maybe even something to help prevent humans like having to go in through a slippery tube that dropped 20 feet through poison gas... and no lights). I wondered whether the floors in the buildling would be 2 feet tall, or 20... surely whatever size the machines chose it would not be the same height as buildings design for humans. Little did I expect that the writers wouldn't think of this at all, and I would be treated to resistance members opening a door (with a handle for... hands) and walking down some stairs with a railing.

This sort of problem existed in every facet of the movie. Whether it was plot or showy special effects, the machines never behaved in a way that was believable. Almost none of the machine models were believable and their weaknesses were similarly ridiculous.

Also, one of the things I remember from Terminator 1 was just how scary the concept of an indestructible machine that was bent on killing you actually was. The machine could take bullets, it could get hit by cars, it could be torched, but it would keep coming. And if it laid one hand on you, you were dead - because it would never let go. If it got your foot you'd better cut that foot off, because it would simply pull you in by it with its insane robo-grip until it could reach you with its other hand and twist your neck. The perfect killing machine that recognized how vulnerable you were and how invulnerable it was and used tactics accordingly.

This layer of terror was instantly lifted the moment the movie started as we're treated to a skeletal terminator who is missing his legs. He gets ahold of Connor and what does he do? Does he grip Connor with a vengance, reel him in, and shove some fingers through is eyes and into his brain? No. Does he snap Connor's neck? No. He throws Connor against a wall. That's right, a machine missing its legs decided that the best way to kill its enemy was to toss him safely out of range. That kind of nonsense absolutely destroys all of the fear built up by the first terminator movie. It makes the machines stupid - and when they're stupid, they're much less scary. This wasn't a one-time deal either. Machines were constantly picking up Connor and tossing him safely into a wall. Why they would ever let go once they got ahold of him I don't know.

Lack of thought killed the movie.

B00028G7GG.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg


Air America 👍👎

Mel Gibson and RDJ team up in this 'Nam movie as pilots flying supplies for a war that politically didn't exist. Good concept for a movie but poor execution. the movie had no discernible plot and very little tension at any point. I was never concerned for RDJ, Gibson... or anyone really. It's kinda hard to identify with anyone, and you don't really understand why they're there, or where they're going. It's a tough movie to really get invested in. There were good moments in the film, some very funny stuff too, but overall it was very blah.

PCQ2D00Z.jpg


Superbad 👍👍

I've seen this one once before. The wife wanted to watch it again, and for some inexplicable reason I actually wasn't enthusiastic about it. I have no idea why, because this is a fantastically funny movie. The two guys featured on the poster, young as they are, are absolute masters of their craft. Nobody does awkward-but-funny quite the way Michale Cera (right) does. And Jonah Hill (left) has a fantastic self-loathing humor. These two guys are excellent at what they do (as is writer Seth Rogen), and I expect to see much much more of them. Perfect pairing for the movie, and just insanely funny all the way through.

ZombielandPoster.jpg


Zombieland 👍👍

Lots of fun. Doesn't take itself particularly seriously, but is just serious enough to string together a plot - even if not a particularly realistic plot. It's a really straight forward movie about killing zombies while attempting to stay sane in a post-apocalyptic world. Not necessarily the greatest movie ever, but very solid. I doubt many people will buy it, or even watch it many times, but I also doubt many people were upset that they saw it once.

surrogates-movie-poster.jpg


Surrogates 👍👎

By now I assume we all know what this movie is about (robots operated remotely by "jacked-in" people for living through). It's a neat movie idea, but the plot isn't especially compelling. It's also not written quite as creatively as I would have expected. I had a few Terminator Salvation moments during this film - like when I asked "Why are they sitting? How are their feet tired? Why are there any chairs anywhere?" "And why do they need a car? Can't they just walk or run or jump to work? Or... bare minimum, hop on a motorcycle." Lots of things didn't quite add up.

The movie worked on some level. It was fun to see them go through the paces and deal with some of the inevitable problems behind surrogacy - especially the concept of being able to change yourself so drastically. But overall I wasn't particularly impressed and don't have any desire to re-watch. It's not a waste of time, but it's not high quality either.
 
Last edited:

Latest Posts

Back