Anyone want to bet that Hamilton is the lightest person in the field?
What's up with Fisi all the way down there? Fisichella is yet to be even close to a strong finish position in the Ferrari. It's nearly as if Badoer is still driving that Ferrari, only that he's changed his name.
I think it says more about how hard the car is to drive without prior testing with KERS.
Apparently with KERS, the braking changes from corner to corner and its even worse when there is a KERS malfunction. Clearly neither Fisi nor Badoer could adapt to this constantly changing feature of the F60.
What you are seeing is the effect driving style has - its only a few tenths but it means a lot in F1, and it happens in all formula. This is why I don't use spec-series as a "true" test of skill, because the cars are always going to favour one driver's style over another. In the same sense, I think this is why Fisi can't push much with this car, it wasn't designed the same way as the Force India.
I think it would be fair to assume that the VJM002 was tailored more to Giancarlo's style, maybe also that both Sutil and Liuzzi have similar styles too.
Best example of spec series being terrible for telling talent - compare Hamilton, Kobayashi, Piquet Jr and Grosjean from their GP2 to F1 careers.
I also wonder if Giancarlo's style doesn't like having that odd ballast of the KERS unit.
Anyways, Grosjean has spun himself out of a seat next year by now surely. He's getting worse than Piquet - at least Nesinho could keep it on the road for one session!
Amazing job by Hamilton, great to see Button go for it and I will be watching Buemi and Kobayashi with much interest.
Pos Driver Weight (kg)
1. Hamilton McLaren-Mercedes 658.5
2. Vettel Red Bull-Renault 663.0
3. Webber Red Bull-Renault 660.0
4. Barrichello Brawn-Mercedes 655.0
5. Button Brawn-Mercedes 657.0
6. Trulli Toyota 661.0
7. Kubica BMW-Sauber 654.5
8. Heidfeld BMW-Sauber 664.0
9. Rosberg Williams-Toyota 665.0
10. Buemi Toro Rosso-Ferrari 661.5
11. Raikkonen Ferrari 692.0*
12. Kobayashi Toyota 694.3*
13. Kovalainen McLaren-Mercedes 697.0*
14. Nakajima Williams-Toyota 704.0*
15. Alguersuari Toro Rosso-Ferrari 696.5*
16. Alonso Renault 708.3*
17. Liuzzi Force India-Mercedes 695.0*
18. Sutil Force India-Mercedes 696.0*
19. Grosjean Renault 710.8*
20. Fisichella Ferrari 692.5*
The best drivers on the grid are able to adapt well ENOUGH to pretty much any trait of the car, and are able to make the most of it and just get on with the damn show.
I was watching some of the onboard footage from Fisi during qualifying today, and to be frank it didn't even look like he belonged in F1 👎 Very poor and inconsistent reads on braking, with crap steering input and lines (constantly feeling for grip even though he wasn't close to the limit), and his throttle application was pretty late and not aggressive.
The VJM002 is a relatively easy car to drive...once he was thrown into the F60 he's looked completely overwhelmed by the complexity and challenging nature of the car. I just don't think he has the outright talent of some of the big names in the sport to drive such a beast in the way Raikkonen or Massa were...that's the easiest way to put it without making excuses for the old dog.
That's another reason why I want to see Button in a car that is difficult to drive (like the F60 or the MP4-24 earlier in the season), as well all know how picky JB is with car set-up and any negative handling characteristic (loose rear especially). I really doubht he would have nearly the confidence in his abilities to push like Hamilton and Raikkonen have shown throughout the season on their skateboards![]()
I'm sorry but even Hamilton and Alonso can't do more than the car is capable of. Point in case, where is Alonso today?
Hamilton struggled to get anywhere earlier in the year - is he rubbish like Fisichella too? Or is it a case of one rule for drivers you like and another rule for drivers you don't?
Don't be sorry because you're responding to something I never said or implied. I was comparing their relative performances to their teammates. That doesn't mean they're supermen and are able to extract the 1-2 seconds needed out their arse to competitive at all times
Maybe he isn't getting the most out of the car, but then only being 3 tenths off Kimi at times isn't terrible considering the problems he has adapting to the car.
3-4 tenths is massive...the difference between being great and not staying in F1 nowadays. Look at Piquet Jr...who you love so muchjk
Fisi is definitely one of those drivers who is on and off, I will agree on that. He is not brilliant but he is good on his day. Somehow I get the smell of the usual "you're only good as your last race". All I will agree on is that he isn't good in the F60 - whether its a measure of his skill or not I don't agree on.
There you go making excuses for your old beloved drivers again...what's new 👎 You might as well make the same excuse for every driver that has been dramatically outperformed by their team mate..."oh the car didn't suit their style...you can't measure his skill when he underperforms"Just sounds like one big giant excuse to me to hang on to your love for an old, experienced driver. If it were a new guy in his seat you would be bickering about how quickly they should be thrown out of the seat
![]()
The best drivers on the grid are able to adapt well ENOUGH to pretty much any trait of the car, and are able to make the most of it and just get on with the damn show.
I'm sorry but even Hamilton and Alonso can't do more than the car is capable of.
The best drivers on the grid are able to adapt well ENOUGH to pretty much any trait of the car, and are able to make the most of it and just get on with the damn show.
As an example, Hamilton likes an oversteery car. Kovalainen likes a neutral-understeery car. If McLaren builds a car that tends to oversteer, Heikki - or any other understeer-preferring driver - is going to be on the back foot before they've turned a wheel. Having a car that compliments your driving style is hugely important, and that applies to all motorsports, not just F1.
Fisichella should have stayed with Force India, at least there is made sense when he did bad.
Most of the drivers who like a understeer dialed in simply don't have as much talent as the drivers who can handle a loose rear...because the understeering car is the easiest car to drive, and in most cases slower.
What else do I need to say?
- Into the chicane
- Into the switchback
- Into the bottom corner
- Into the first corner (if the guy in front screws up)
- Into the turn seventeen (as above)
Fuel weights:
Code:Pos Driver Weight (kg) 1. Hamilton McLaren-Mercedes 658.5 2. Vettel Red Bull-Renault 663.0 3. Webber Red Bull-Renault 660.0 4. Barrichello Brawn-Mercedes 655.0 5. Button Brawn-Mercedes 657.0 6. Trulli Toyota 661.0 7. Kubica BMW-Sauber 654.5 8. Heidfeld BMW-Sauber 664.0 9. Rosberg Williams-Toyota 665.0 10. Buemi Toro Rosso-Ferrari 661.5 11. Raikkonen Ferrari 692.0* 12. Kobayashi Toyota 694.3* 13. Kovalainen McLaren-Mercedes 697.0* 14. Nakajima Williams-Toyota 704.0* 15. Alguersuari Toro Rosso-Ferrari 696.5* 16. Alonso Renault 708.3* 17. Liuzzi Force India-Mercedes 695.0* 18. Sutil Force India-Mercedes 696.0* 19. Grosjean Renault 710.8* 20. Fisichella Ferrari 692.5*
Unless Hamilton can scamper off into the distance, Vettel to win.
*snip*
What else do I need to say?
Buemi for surprise podium
If only, maybe I can hope for some of the engines to go kablam, especially the RBR's.
I think a Brawn will win, can't decide which.
GPUpdateCar weights: Hamilton lighter than RBR as Renault fuel up
31 October 2009 / Results / Photos
Lewis Hamilton will be carrying more fuel into the start of Sunday's Abu Dhabi Grand Prix than the Red Bull pairing of Sebastian Vettel and Mark Webber behind him
1 - Lewis Hamilton / McLaren = 658.5kg *
2 - Sebastian Vettel / Red Bull = 663.0kg
3 - Mark Webber / Red Bull = 660.0kg *
Buemi for surprise podium
If only, maybe I can hope for some of the engines to go kablam, especially the RBR's.
I think a Brawn will win, can't decide which.
And being able to adapt (which is my main argument) to a cars handling traits is just as important as anything else. Alonso is probably the best at extracting the maximum potential out of any car he is given, although he likes a balanced car, he has absolutely no problem handling a loose rear end or understeer. Most of the drivers who like a understeer dialed in simply don't have as much talent as the drivers who can handle a loose rear...because the understeering car is the easiest car to drive, and in most cases slower.
What else do I need to say?
Doesn't Alonso prefer an Understeery car?
C.
He PREFERS a understeer to nuetral balance...although he can work with and be quick with any type of balance.
Brawn for the win!? Unless Hamilton retires or has serious issues....there's not a chance in hell!I hope you're joking around haha
Hamilton's pole lap on slightly more fuel than the Brawn's was nearly a second quicker....not to mention he has KER's w/ Mercedes power to keep pretty much the entire field behind.
My money is on the best driver and the best car (for this circuit) for the win by a landslide...and that's Hamilton in the Mclaren 👍
Is that you just shooting your theory in the foot?
Or are you admitting that Alonso "simply don't have as much talent"
C.
See, here's where you and me differ in many views, you seem to have a clear single choice on who is good. Whereas I believe almost all drivers and teams are good.
Brawn have a chance to win, yes, Hamilton has better chances, but its not impossible for Brawn to win.
As Murray would say "Anything can happen, and in F1 it usually does!".
Kobyashi for the win! "Anything can happen, and in F1 it usually does"Blah Blah Blah!!!