- 5,303
- Riverside, Ca
- GTP_Leonidae_MFT
Yeah, now all it needs is loss of 400lbs.
I already told you, no coupes!I applaud Chrysler for keeping the iconic shape and look of the Challenger. I'd like to see it stay around for as long as the 911. Doesnt matter to me if the car hasnt sold as much as the Mustang and Camaro. They are doing their own thing.
I'm digging those colors and packages. Are there any race versions in the Pirelli Challenge or Continental series? I could see it as a V8 SUPERCAR
I already told you, no coupes!
NASCAR though...
Nascar needs to go backwards in time....
Not quite.
From what I am hearing, the suspension was pretty heavily updated, but not 100% sure on that.
More than likely.It's still heavy, probably still heavier than the Charger/300...
I applaud Chrysler for keeping the iconic shape and look of the Challenger. I'd like to see it stay around for as long as the 911. Doesnt matter to me if the car hasnt sold as much as the Mustang and Camaro. They are doing their own thing.
I'm digging those colors and packages. Are there any race versions in the Pirelli Challenge or Continental series? I could see it as a V8 SUPERCAR
They should design the new one closer enough to the original challenger and make it sleeker while keeping the face similar to the 2015.What they need to do is scrap this body style in 2-3 years and start fresh like Ford did with the Mustang but keep a few retro cues. Chevy's done their facelifts well enough that they don't have to worry about it for a while.
Eventually, I'd like to see Dodge do up a new Challenger with absolutely NOTHING in common with previous generations, similarly to how the Fox Body looks nothing like a 1965 Mustang.
Not now obviously. In a few years. The retro thing is getting stale after being around for so long.I think its fine. It's one of the few cars that pulls off the retro thing nicely. Change it too much and it just won't be the same.
Those two have had 50 years to evolve and change. Not so with the challenger.The same could be said about anyone who owns a new Mustang or Camaro for that matter.
I actually think it looks lower than the previous model. The car is very large and tall either way so they have to get tricky to make it look low.I wish the Challenger wasn't so skinny looking from the back. It's too vertical. The original was a masterpiece of horizontality, the new one is a bit muddled.
I actually saw a Challenger in partial camo cold weather testing in Ann Arbor yesterday. I wonder if it was this facelift or something else not yet revealed.
Don't hate modern cars, hate capitalism. Forty years ago American car companies didn't have foreign competition so they could splurge for cheap and it was virtually guaranteed tons of people would buy it. Because those people didn't have many other choices. But now the choices are numerous, market shares are smaller and spread between all the companies, and in order to make as much money back in the day they have to ride the same product for longer to spread out the unit costs. It might not be as interesting but it's a helluva lot more efficient.This is one of the reasons I hate modern cars. 40 years they got the same update within a year now it takes 7 years to get one.
What do you mean? Ford took a huge risk changing the Mustang entirely.I'm surprised that Dodge is the only American company with balls.