I get to play with a lot of rental cars at work. Last time I was in a new Durango, the materials in it were nicer than any of the newest GM and Ford cars. It was a nicer truck than the Explorer in my opinion. GM doesn't have anything that can compare to either - their materials are ****ing miserable. Frankly I don't expect much from GM anymore. I assume the current Charger has gotten an update a year or two ago to match what Chrysler has done. Speaking of Chrysler, the latest 200 was also pretty nice inside and like the Fusion I much preferred it to a Malibu. To make matters worse for GM, their engineers have no clue how to make an interior fit a normal human being's shape. The pedal/seat/wheel relationship is all wrong. My arms are 4 feet long for cripe's sake, you can't put the steering wheel that far away! Then they give it a whole 2 inches of telescope, of course. This problem plagues GM cars and I haven't had any such issues in Chryslers or Fords.Furthermore, I'd hope that they get around to completely redoing the interior, using properly graded materials that are at least on-par with the mainstream options from GM and Ford.
I get to play with a lot of rental cars at work. Last time I was in a new Durango, the materials in it were nicer than any of the newest GM and Ford cars. It was a nicer truck than the Explorer in my opinion. GM doesn't have anything that can compare to either - their materials are ****ing miserable. Frankly I don't expect much from GM anymore. I assume the current Charger has gotten an update a year or two ago to match what Chrysler has done. Speaking of Chrysler, the latest 200 was also pretty nice inside and like the Fusion I much preferred it to a Malibu. To make matters worse for GM, their engineers have no clue how to make an interior fit a normal human being's shape. The pedal/seat/wheel relationship is all wrong. My arms are 4 feet long for cripe's sake, you can't put the steering wheel that far away! Then they give it a whole 2 inches of telescope, of course. This problem plagues GM cars and I haven't had any such issues in Chryslers or Fords.
I get to play with a lot of rental cars at work. Last time I was in a new Durango, the materials in it were nicer than any of the newest GM and Ford cars. It was a nicer truck than the Explorer in my opinion. GM doesn't have anything that can compare to either - their materials are ****ing miserable. Frankly I don't expect much from GM anymore. I assume the current Charger has gotten an update a year or two ago to match what Chrysler has done. Speaking of Chrysler, the latest 200 was also pretty nice inside and like the Fusion I much preferred it to a Malibu. To make matters worse for GM, their engineers have no clue how to make an interior fit a normal human being's shape. The pedal/seat/wheel relationship is all wrong. My arms are 4 feet long for cripe's sake, you can't put the steering wheel that far away! Then they give it a whole 2 inches of telescope, of course. This problem plagues GM cars and I haven't had any such issues in Chryslers or Fords.
In my opinion the facelifted (current) charger with the led taillight bar that spans across the entire rear looks miles better than the 2 single taillights on the earlier model. I agree, still a bit more to be desired. I just wish an iconic car like the Charger wasn't drug through the mud into a 4 door rental car.I have a feeling that front picture will get my hopes up. Then when it's revealed... major disappoint. The current Charger isn't so bad. The rear I just can't get on board with. I appreciate what they tried to do but it didn't work out too well.
In my opinion the facelifted (current) charger with the led taillight bar that spans across the entire rear looks miles better than the 2 single taillights on the earlier model. I agree, still a bit more to be desired. I just wish an iconic car like the Charger wasn't drug through the mud into a 4 door rental car.
View attachment 139381 View attachment 139383
View attachment 139386
Shambles? Chrysler is currently the most profitable company in Fiat Group. Fiat bought Chrysler so they could stay afloat.And yet who will sell better still while Dodge tries to get out of shambles? Ford and Chevy (GM)
Shambles? Chrysler is currently the most profitable company in Fiat Group. Fiat bought Chrysler so they could stay afloat.
GM is doing the same old nonsense they've always done. Lackluster efforts, shady politics. You can't keep all your other brands alive with just Corvette and Cadillac.
I read that the 2015 Charger will resemble the Maserati Ghibli in terms of styling. I don't know how to respond to that, have to see the reveal before judging it but my first impression after reading that is that it will look like something out of europe rather than american. Hopefully it doesn't lose its american styling.
GM doesn't have anything that can compare to either - their materials are ****ing miserable.
I assume the current Charger has gotten an update a year or two ago to match what Chrysler has done.
Speaking of Chrysler, the latest 200 was also pretty nice inside and like the Fusion I much preferred it to a Malibu.
i forgot where i hear them, i'll try looking for it. But maybe they meant that the basis of the car is almost the same as the Ghibli.View attachment 139666
Where you hear that from??? you can clearly tell just by the teaser that it looks nothing like the Ghibli.
Heres a pic without the Fish bowl effect
Here we go again.And yet who will sell better still while Dodge tries to get out of shambles? Ford and Chevy (GM)
Here we go again.
Give it up already. We get it. You hate Chrysler. Good for you.
Give what up already? And who the hell are you to say what I hate or not, your obviously assuming and you'd be wrong. I'm actually a Mopar fan, but if me being factual and critiquing them is bad we can get into it. Or you could put me on ignore and go do your gibberish somewhere else.
And yet who will sell better still while Dodge tries to get out of shambles? Ford and Chevy (GM)