- 4,221
- Louisville, KY
- ukfan758
Real or not, that is pure gold.
Real or not, that is pure gold.
It's kind of hard to make that argument when Hamilton didn't even try to make the apex. And like I said, the move was unnecessary because he could have left Rosberg plenty of racing room and still hold the racing line into the next corner. The whole complex is designed to give an attacking driver a second chance if they can't pull off a pass through the first corner, or to give a defending driver the opportunity to fight back straight away.Yes, you have to leave racing room....however, if two cars are side by side, the car on the inside controls the apex and thus the corner.
It's kind of hard to make that argument when Hamilton didn't even try to make the apex.
Didn't try, or simply couldn't...it's up for interpretation. It's easy for us to watch slow motion replays and judge, but those are split second decisions. Maybe he missed the apex unintentionally, and then decided to just roll with it and block Nico. We saw in the race after that Lewis was struggling with front end grip on the Inters. Regardless, the way I understand the rules, Lewis was not obligated to turn in more at that point, so like @TenEightyOne said, why would he? Im not arguing it was a clean move, like JPM said before, "that's racing".It's kind of hard to make that argument when Hamilton didn't even try to make the apex. And like I said, the move was unnecessary because he could have left Rosberg plenty of racing room and still hold the racing line into the next corner. The whole complex is designed to give an attacking driver a second chance if they can't pull off a pass through the first corner, or to give a defending driver the opportunity to fight back straight away.
It's kind of hard to make that argument when Hamilton didn't even try to make the apex.
He had minimal steering lock in the tightest corner on the circuit, went off the racing line and didn't lock his brakes. I have seen drivers who lock their brakes apply more angle than Hamilton did. He clearly did not try to make the apex.Didn't try, or simply couldn't...it's up for interpretation
He had minimal steering lock in the tightest corner on the circuit, went off the racing line and didn't lock his brakes. I have seen drivers who lock their brakes apply more angle than Hamilton did. He clearly did not try to make the apex.
On the exit you see him turning much more than he was during the move, I don't think he turned tight because he wanted to make sure he could get good traction as well as keep Nico at bay.I don't think 90 degrees is minimal, especially at that tight corner, he is braking and the more you turn in (while braking) the less grip you'll get (cmiiw), so that's why he looked like pushing off Nico off track but he's actually just maximizing the speed he could get by using the space available.
Have you watched the on-board footage from everyone else? They put half as much lock again on the wheel.I don't think 90 degrees is minimal, especially at that tight corner
He had minimal steering lock in the tightest corner on the circuit, went off the racing line and didn't lock his brakes. I have seen drivers who lock their brakes apply more angle than Hamilton did. He clearly did not try to make the apex.
So the ends justify the means, do they? Hamilton's a three-time World Champion, so clearly he gets the job done. Well, I will direct your attention to a man by the name of Mr. V. Rossi, nine-times World Champion, who did something completely unjustified under the rules, but hey, he got the job done. Likewise, Mr. M. Schumacher, seven-times World Champion, who did exactly what Hamilton did and turn in on a championship rival - albeit with different results - in 1997.Three times World Champion.
And I refute the idea that only Hamilton's supporters will back him. Because I know plenty of Hamilton supporters who think he went too far. Like I said, if you want to try it in the court of public opinion, prepare to be disappointed. We already know that Hamiltom has a history of showing no respect for other competitors.
And you do absolutely need to have that grunt to be successful in any form of racing. As the saying goes, nice guys finish last.Very often those drivers who are prepared to screw over the competition are the ones who become WDC. Look at the hero-worship for Senna, for example, or the brutish Alan Jones, or indeed Rosberg Sr., all uncompromising, singular and often not-very-pleasant-people-on-race-day.
So the ends justify the means, do they? Hamilton's a three-time World Champion, so clearly he gets the job done. Well, I will direct your attention to a man by the name of Mr. V. Rossi, nine-times World Champion, who did something completely unjustified under the rules, but hey, he got the job done. Likewise, Mr. M. Schumacher, seven-times World Champion, who did exactly what Hamilton did and turn in on a championship rival - albeit with different results - in 1997.
Now, just the other day you were telling me that you expect me to judge drivers based on their on-track performance. I have done just that, but it's apparently not good enough for you because I seem to have come to the wrong conclusion.
And I refute the idea that only Hamilton's supporters will back him. Because I know plenty of Hamilton supporters who think he went too far. Like I said, if you want to try it in the court of public opinion, prepare to be disappointed. We already know that Hamiltom has a history of showing no respect for other competitors.
Edited for truth.1. Deliberately running his teammate out to the edge of the track.
I'm no Hamilton fanboy...only driver I have any preference for is Button. So I'm one of those people who is lot a Hamilton fanboy, but see no problem with his move.
He executed a perfect block pass, with Nico's assistance of course, as he walked right into the trap.
Senna vs Prost, Schumacher vs Hill, Schumacher vs Villeneve we all the exact same thing, yet Hamilton's move turned out much better than the other ones. Rosberg was able to continue, so it's not a big deal!
And yes, the ends absolutely justify the means. No one ever won a championship by ensuring every pass they made was clean, or by never blocking anyone. There's no incentive to win the WDC by being nice to everyone else.
Like has been mentioned, many of the greatest drivers all had a side to them that they would do whatever it takes to win. Lewis didn't cheat, he kept it within the rules (granted, just within), so I have no issue with his win.
After Suzuka, how does the famous Bush line not apply? "We have a saying in Texas. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me again...fool me twice, shame on...ugh....fool me once can't get fooled again!" Like I've been saying, Nico walked into that one.
I think this incedent shows the fundamental difference between Lewis and Nico. I think most of it comes down to their formative years, where Lewis had to work for everything and carve his own path, whereas Nico had everything layed out for him. I can't imagine him showing up at a karting track with poor supplies or support. So with that in mind, I don't think he ever had to go into "desperation underdog" mode, and therefor doesn't have that kind of scrab etched into his persona. It's why he gets pushed around, and why he cries on the radio when he does.
Senna vs Prost, Schumacher vs Hill, Schumacher vs Villeneve we all the exact same thing, yet Hamilton's move turned out much better than the other ones. Rosberg was able to continue, so it's not a big deal!
Only because they race on big parking lots nowadays.
So Ummm. Rosberg explained that he did his mistake in Austin because of a gust of wind.
Not sure I'm buying that. Is it even possible ?
That situation is not likely to improve much with all that Mexican food this weekend.So Ummm. Rosberg explained that he did his mistake in Austin because of a gust of wind.
So Ummm. Rosberg explained that he did his mistake in Austin because of a gust of wind.
Not sure I'm buying that. Is it even possible ?
...seriously?
Now all people will do is laugh at him.