- 4,221
- Louisville, KY
- ukfan758
🤬It just started, Audi hit #18 Porsche, it went off and stalled, KCMG in the gravel, now under safety.
🤬It just started, Audi hit #18 Porsche, it went off and stalled, KCMG in the gravel, now under safety.
I'm very happy.🤬![]()
That's putting it lightly...Dunlop wet tires are as bad as Continental's.
Tbh that 97 car needed a change.Mucke is a really good signing. Although I'll miss him with Aston![]()
Not sure if your serious as the during qualifying they are using softs which is putting them up that then means they have less softs for the race and also tyres don't put you at the bottom of the speed traps.Actual reasons for Aston Martin to be off the pace. http://www.dailysportscar.com/2015/11/03/bop-process-changes-loom-to-bolster-gte.html
Maybe Aston should be tweeting about Michelin instead of weight and air inlets.
If the car has to run more wing angle to match the other teams because the tires work better on the Porsche and Ferrari then that would be a issue. 99 car was the fastest GTE car in the speed trap at China BTW on the new tires.Not sure if your serious as the during qualifying they are using softs which is putting them up that then means they have less softs for the race and also tyres don't put you at the bottom of the speed traps.
So where were the rest of the Aston in China and also where were they in Fuji,cota and Nurburgring on the speed traps?If the car has to run more wing angle to match the other teams because the tires work better on the Porsche and Ferrari then that would be a issue. 99 car was the fastest GTE car in the speed trap at China BTW on the new tires.
271.4 (99) and 266 kph at China for the 97 vs 266 kph for the 91 and 92So where were the rest of the Aston in China and also where were they in Fuji,cota and Nurburgring on the speed traps?
It's not all about tyres and why not post the speed traps of the other cars?271.4 (99) and 266 kph at China for the 97 vs 266 kph for the 91 and 92
269.3-269.3-270 kph 99-95-97 vs 272 (91) and 270 (92) at Fuji
256.5-256.5-255.3 kph 95-99-97 vs 258.4 for 91-21 at COTA (before BOP change) on a slick track in 95 deg heat
258.8-258.3-257.1 kph 99-95-97 vs 260.0 (91)- 259.4 (92) Nurb.
So Aston Martin are handicapped and cant find the podium w/o following the crowd because they are 1-2 mph slower/or 3 mph faster than their rivals, get real. Instead of spending their time crying on twitter that the world is unfair to the company that sells 5000 cars a year WORLDWIDE go test some tires.
That's depressing.LMP1 privateer programs hit buffers!
They just released the new engine exactly when there potential customers give up!! Ahah
That's depressing.![]()
Good way to win the championship be the only one in itWell that's just perfect; so we lost two potentially good LMP1-E projects, which were either delayed (Strakka) or downright canceled (Greaves), but byKollesGod we must have two of Colin's Money Pit to deal with next season. At this rate, we may as well drive the nail in the proverbial coffin lid for the LMP1 Essence class... On the plus side, being a Money Pit, the ByKolles can at least give this new Judd/AIM combination some money before it falls apart, much like the car itself.
Good way to win the championship be the only one in it![]()
You need to finish the races to win it! ahaha!Good way to win the championship be the only one in it![]()
Since this pissing contest you started today is about the Pro cars and their tires I only looked at the car that has dominated since Le Mans,Porsche. 1-2,1-2,2-4,1-3 finishes seems to me to be the target to compare to.It's not all about tyres and why not post the speed traps of the other cars?
Yep they were 1 kph slower at Nurb and COTA. Guess who was 12 kph @ Nurb and 10 kph slower COTA thru the traps than the Audi and yet won the races with ease? Last time I checked they dont award points for best trap speed.I guess you'll know that will just prove that Aston's are bottom of the traps compared to ALL the other teams?
And it will only get tougher when Ford shows up with it's GT prototype, maybe it time for them to step back and run the ELMS and focus on GT3 cars instead since they cant compete at the grown-ups table.AMR risk losing a lot here, as said before their FULL program is funded by customers NOT by the manufacturer, so far we have Jan pulling his car from races and also Paul looking to go else where so he can be competitive. That's 2 cars that Prodrive risk losing and a good chunk of money.
But when you include the others such as the corvette and the 458 it is still coming bottom of the speed traps and the porsche is set up for acceleration not for top speed and hardly comparible with an LMP1 car.Since this pissing contest you started today is about the Pro cars and their tires I only looked at the car that has dominated since Le Mans,Porsche. 1-2,1-2,2-4,1-3 finishes seems to me to be the target to compare to.
Yep they were 1 kph slower at Nurb and COTA. Guess who was 12 kph @ Nurb and 10 kph slower COTA thru the traps than the Audi and yet won the races with ease? Last time I checked they dont award points for best trap speed.
And it will only get tougher when Ford shows up with it's GT prototype, maybe it time for them to step back and run the ELMS and focus on GT3 cars instead since they cant compete at the grown-ups table.
So lets see the data. All I can see is the Alkamelsystems timing and the data is limited.I'll stick with my contacts as i feel they know a fair bit more than you
The info is all there.So lets see the data. All I can see is the Alkamelsystems timing and the data is limited.
That's what I figured.The info is all there.
Hey if you can't interpret things properly that's fine, if you don't believe the info I post again that's perfectly fine but I'm sure @Furinkazen can confirm that there have been things we have discussed privately which have came true in both this thread and the btcc thread.That's what I figured.![]()