So, is this suppose to make somebody feel better? If anything it sounds callous. Many motorsport injuries and deaths are the results of poor safety measures that should have been noticed and rectified beforehand. That fact seems to elude you. You act as though every single racing injury or death is completely unforseeable and random. Thinking that may make you feel better, but it doesnt make it the truth.
Not trying to make anyone feel better, simply being realistic, and I wasn't trying to be callous. As I've stated before, I believe the correct thing to do is evaluate all risks in a methodical and analytical fashion, there are accepted ways of doing this (even standardised), reacting to a specific incident might stop that specific incident from happening again, but unless you put preventative actions in place for every other risk at a similar level all you are doing is to see what kills somebody next, then reacting to it (proactive vs. reactive).
What would make me feel better is not thinking things are random or unforeseeable, it would be people taking a measured reaction to an event, not a knee-jerk one. In something as dangerous as motorsport (at least of the 4 wheeled, tarmac variety) I think the level of safety currently achieved is outstanding, which is great because I believe it's been engineered to be safer. In my opinion the only reason why more people aren't killed in Rallying and Motorcycle road racing is blind luck, and if people want to get up in arms about motorsport safety, that's where their attention should be.
If you want 99.9% safe racing, IMO, it can only take place in the virtual world, but then it wouldn't be motorsport.
__________
Moving on to the general topic of Indycar... I'm rooting for Montoya. Sonoma is going to be a nail-biter!