That's great but wrong and while there isn't a current for U.S. turbo, there was one made for the U.S. that ended up being sold in SA and Australia this current gen that is a 2.5 turbo at 268hp or 270~. The GT and B spec before were turbo and sold in the U.S. which brings me back to my question that has yet been answered but one or two have hinted at why it shouldn't, why is the STi needed and where would it be placed? Actually let me be more direct, where would it be placed and how would it be spec wise, that it doesn't eat into WRX STi sales and territory. 14hp difference...wow that's massive Keef, hence the key words being "close to" Not that six hp matters but since you wanted to be anal, the Camary I saw at top spec is 301hp and the price was much more than 3k, but I'll assume options were the reason and your supposed 3k apart is base. Gen six started in 2014...if you're talking about the global use of the 3.6 engine, that wasn't what I was talking about. As for the year different in MY the point still stands, the Subaru is probably the last car to make its transition thus comparing the two is strange. Wow so two cars that have power ratings that the Legacy has years ahead with the GT...okay. Not only that but the Altima isn't that great, nor is the output as you stated, it's 236 in 2.0 guise. I'd have to guess the Accord is good because I don't ever see anything to the contrary, and the fact that the Subaru is capable of much more as has been shown with the global GT. Again if you're going to be anal (about a Typo of all things, seriously) then get the power figures right. Second I can't find an A-Spec under 40k but interesting nonetheless that you suggest it. Also there is an AWD option and it starts at 35k with 310hp that is a Subaru.