I mean, if the award was straight up given to the best/most decisive player, then the last 12 years should have been given to either Ronaldo or Messi, depending on preference, as those two have been above everyone else when it comes to consistency. If that's the case, then 2018 should have gone to Ronaldo. If the Modric Ballon d'Or is to be taken seriously and as the standard to achieve such award, then Jorginho should have won it based on the Euro's and UCL wins, and the same goes for Van Dijk in 2019, Sneijder in 2010 and Iniesta in 2012. If being the best goalscorer in the year is used as the metric, then it's Lewa.
I still find it weird that it only counts from January 1st, and not the entirity of the previous season. If the ballon d'or is given in November, then in the very least, should count with the stats since the same month from the previous year. If it's just the calendar year and not the season, then give the award in January. If it's for the season, give the award in the Summer.
And some of those stats are kind of irrelevant. 2.5k passes for a Barcelona player is very different to a striker from any other team. I'm more impressed by Benzema in that regard. Any other player playing for a team that has a lot less ball possession, won't make as many passes. Almost every stat relies on ball possession. A more accurate metric would be X stat per touch or possession.
I'm also wondering what is labeled as a big chance missed.
Anyways, some journalist from France Football traded shots at Ronaldo, for some reason, which is just weird prior to a Ballon d'Or nomination. Blatter did something similar in the past. Either way, even pro-Messi pundits are against the nomination, which says a lot.