AC VS PC2

[Joe-dogs]

 

[Joe-dogs]

Of course, AC makes it realistic. But PC2 is still on Need for Speed level. AC version must be taken as the reference.

 

[FOG-Smokebeer]

Here we go again nothing better to do ?

 

[crowhop]

How does Laguna look at sunset in AC?
I bet it looks awesome, since it is the standard and all. Also bet the pooling of puddles looks great there in the rain too. Pcars2 can't touch that.

AC is definitely the standard for realism...

 

[jake2013guy]

Would be nice if the thread title was accurate and with the content in the OP...

 

[killerjimbag]

Of course, AC makes it realistic. But PC2 is still on Need for Speed level. AC version must be taken as the reference.

Dude have a Merry Christmas. Hopefully in the New Year you find something better to do with your time.

 

[Corsa]

You compare Project Cars to Need for Speed, but enjoy Gran Turismo Sport physics?

https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/threads/i-have-a-lobby-up-tc-of-abs-of.370406/#post-12091715

That is your thread correct?

You speak of reference here yet you judge two very good physics accomplished games while secretly in the closet playing a formulaic one.

I agree Assetto Corsa is my favorite for driving, but Project Cars 2 is pretty damn close to it now and if @IanBell and company continue as they are PC will be the definitive physics simulator.

You just can't beat the dollar for content they've put forth.

 

[Sentry87]

Please don't feed the troll.

Now excuse me. I'm going to go back to reading the GT Sport sub forums so I'm reminded there are sim racers less fortunate then me.

 

[Daz555]

They both look great to be honest.

 

[Scaff]

Of course, AC makes it realistic. But PC2 is still on Need for Speed level. AC version must be taken as the reference.

No, realty is the reference.

The fact that you want AC to be is both absurdly biased and pure flame bait.

Locked.