Best window shape ever.

[Carl.]

Tired of your neighbor's constant whining?

Just let him know, in a subtle way...

(well, in fact it's a vent covering, not a real window... that just made a weird title)

 

[Dark Elite]

Excellent

You have to admire the guy's originality!

Stan Torgersen added that the gesture is visible from every window on the back of his house.

And his planning!

Actually filing a complaint about the 'vent covering' is ridiculous, and the Torgersens shouldn't have a problem with Wood developing land he bought within the local regulations.
This is just a guy with a sense of humour trying to show a perhaps not-so-friendly neighbour how petty the arguements are.

DE

 

[ChampCarFan]

totally true it is so funny though omg i wish i could do that to the side of my house or put kill all in his garden hose i am so so evil

 

[xXSilencerXx]

Man that's awsome. His neighbors seem like grade A a**holes. They seem to just be complaining about everything this guys does on land that's his.

 

[Randymcchickenf]

Haha, someone get that man a medal

 

[Der Alta]

Hmmm.. Note to self, incoporate that in next building design.

Duke, you taking notes as well?

 

[Keef]

Dark Elite, I see you aren't from America like I. No offense, but you may have trouble understanding if you aren't down with the new American Way. Complain about everything, you might make some money. Well, at least according to that lady who sued Wal-Mart because she broke her ankle...................................tripping over here son.

 

[Carl.]

^^ I don't believe you, that's just not plausible.

 

[Keef]

I can't wait until someone sees a real cactus while walking through the Grand Canyon, then sues the state of Arizona because they felt threatened by the plant, which appeared to be flicking them off.



I can somwhat agree with the Starbucks case. If the defendant lady was telling the truth about the spill being caused by a negligent employee then that employee deserves to have her ass kicked a little. But see, it's impossible for that employee that hand over the compensation required of a lifetime of twitchin' toes. So, Starbucks itself would be the next step--as in, they can provide compensation.
All I know of the lady who broke her ankle is that she tripped over her kid. I have no clue what may lave led to that, but it could have been legitimate if an employee bumped her, or a cart hit her, or some dumb thing like that.

But it's funnier the other way.

 

[Dark Elite]

Dark Elite, I see you aren't from America like I. No offense, but you may have trouble understanding if you aren't down with the new American Way. Complain about everything, you might make some money.

You mean, I have better ways of going through life and/or making money than turning other people's justified actions to my unfair advantage? I know, thanks.


DE

 

[FoolKiller]

That is a brilliant window design. wish I had thought of it. I have some neighbors I would like to deliver a message to.

I can somwhat agree with the Starbucks case. If the defendant lady was telling the truth about the spill being caused by a negligent employee then that employee deserves to have her ass kicked a little. But see, it's impossible for that employee that hand over the compensation required of a lifetime of twitchin' toes. So, Starbucks itself would be the next step--as in, they can provide compensation.

As an employee of Starbucks she represents the company, so the lawsuit should go to Starbucks. From a customer standpoint while on duty she is Starbucks. If she were off-duty and just spilled some coffee on someone then she would be sued, although they would probbaly sue whoever made the coffee too.