I'm just going to leave these here:
(notice the banner in the background)
(ha!)
....
Discuss
Does anyone else feel like we're being trolled? I feel like we're being trolled. This is rather silly.
Huh? Just b/c you don't like what someone has to say doesn't mean they're doing it just to get under your skin. Stop being paranoid.
RE: What is the Chevrolet Cruze?
The Chevrolet Cruze is based on GM's Delta II chassis that was designed primarily by the Germans. The same platform rides under the Cruze and it's rebadged siblings (Buick, Daewoo, Holden etc), as well as the Opel Astra and its spin offs. The Chevrolet Orlando and Volt also use the same basic architecture. The Cruze itself was developed mostly by GM's Korean and European arms... And by no means is that a bad thing. The cars drive well, use upscale materials, and is well enough one of the best small cars your money can buy. Until the new Focus shows up, of course.
So the car that's billed/marketed to save Detroit is a quazi-Korean thing. GM says it's all-American. I say it's not and I'm 100% right.
So, what is there to be angry about? Both the Cruze and the Volt are built right here in the US, by American workers, with money that goes to an American company. These are cars that we can be proud of, cars that are pushing boundaries forward in the segment. Are we going to be pissed off because the Camaro was developed by the Australians? What about the new Viper being worked on by the Italians? Does it really matter that much in the global economy that everyone seemed to be asking for?
If the car was built on an Opel/German platform, wouldn't that make it a German car? The BMW X5, numerous Toyotas & Hondas are manufactured in the US, but no one says they're an American car now do they?
And yes, it matters much despite the global economy. US taxpayers bailed out a bankrupt, corrupt, and woefully incompetent company - not the global economy. Billions upon billions given to GM, and they re-badge a car and put batteries in it. Yes, that's a big deal.
RE: Where to Plug in a Plug-In
Assuming that you've been living under a rock, you're probably not aware of the fact that GM has already begun working with cities across the country with building an infrastructure that is capable of handling the demands of Volt drivers (the same can be said for the Leaf as well). This includes charging stations in parking lots and garages, curbside chargers, as well as businesses that are looking into providing places for both employees and customers to charge their vehicles. Cities like San Francisco, New York, Detroit, and Washington D.C. will be among the first to get some of the treatment.
I don't live under a rock, I live under something much worse; the iron fist of the IRS.
Who do you think is going to pay for all that 'infrastructure'? Volt drivers? No. We all will. The Fed is broke, California is broke, NY city is broke, Detroit is worse than broke, and D.C. pulls from the same piggy bank as the Fed.
How many billions will be wasted on this? How much longer than expected will this take? How much over budget will this take? The gov't doesn't spend money well b/c it's not really their money, it's ours. And if it's built in these places, who runs it? The same folks who run the Post Office? They're broke. The same folks who run Amtrak? They're broke. How about the public transport agencies? They're probably deep in the red too.
So what happens? Another gov't 'experiment' will become a welfare recipient. There's a snoball's chance in hell something like that will break even or be profitable in the long run.
You know, it's going to be different, but so what? The more that they sell, whether its the Volt, the Leaf, the Plug-In Prius or "something else," the easier it is going to be to get an EV, get it charged, and go about your life in the same way that you were before.
This is utopia huh? Drive around the country sometime and you'll see why EV's, at best, are a niche product.
RE: Traffic, Brah
Sitting in traffic in a Volt is going to be better for the environment than it would be if you were doing the same in a Civic. I'm failing to see your point in this regard.
My point is that the Volt will not travel 40 miles on a charge in rush-hour traffic. Tooling around the neiborhood, going to the grocery store; ok...it works. But slogging through LA, NY, DC, Chicago traffic - no way.
From going from your house in the suburbs to you workplace in the city is often done via public transportation. Trains, subways, buses which are generally on schedule are a lot less expensive than parking in a city.
The Volt is a fashion accessory and will be the MS Zune to Apple's Ipod, which is the Prius. It's doomed. Look at the Civic Hybrid; MPGs, hybrid tech, and Honda's reputation wasn't enough to move those off of lots. It wasn't the right 'designer label' and I see no reason why the Volt will all of the sudden become the 'it' product. The Civic Hybrid got absolutely killed by Honda SUV sales.
People, in the end, don't really give a **** about MPGs - it's all about image.
It's not better for the environment if hipsters junk their perfectly good cars for this. Know what is? Keeping your current car a few years longer. This whole 'green' battery powered nonsense is a fraud. The politicians got some hair brained idea to make oil & the very air we exhale a boogieman and legislated their idea b/c of hubris.
Let the market/people decide without regulations, tax-breaks, subsidies, taxes on taxes, or other intervention. In an environment with little intervention from Uncle Sam, I doubt this car would even make it past a water cooler discussion. There's some really neat ideas out there on how to make the combustion engine much more efficient, but Obama says batteries...so we get batteries whether we like it or not.
If, by some act of divine intervention, the Gov't gets out of most facets of the car business (de-regulation, taxation, & selling it's ownership of GM), and if EVs do sell like hotcakes - I'll buy you a steak dinner and open a bar tab for ya.