"Daily" Race Discussion [Archive]

  • Thread starter Thread starter LordDrift
  • 79,453 comments
  • 1,372,726 views
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why don't you all just pm each other about that topic, stick to the thread
We’re talking about what it takes to get into the top 10 in Daily/weekly races....not really that far off topic. Chill on the mini-modding 👍

It doesn't exist. It simply doesn't.

Austisticboyx could've certainly worded it better, but I understand what he's trying to say. Anyone can reach top 10 if they work hard enough.
Sorry, I don’t buy it. By that logic, with hard work and practice, anyone could be Senna or Hamilton.
 
We’re talking about what it takes to get into the top 10 in Daily/weekly races....not really that far off topic. Chill on the mini-modding 👍


Sorry, I don’t buy it. By that logic, with hard work and practice, anyone could be Senna or Hamilton.
It took me roughly about 2 years to get into the top 10 with a lot of hard work, so I guess I did it then
 
Sorry, I don’t buy it. By that logic, with hard work and practice, anyone could be Senna or Hamilton.
Honestly, I think that is true. The reason why there aren't so many Sennas and Hamiltons in the world is because of opportunities, or lack thereof, than talent. Not everyone starts karting at the age of 2, not everyone gets their talent recognized by the best teams, and not everyone has an equal amount of time that they can devote to racing. If I have to label anything as a talent, it is the rate of which people learn new stuff. This may be why some people still dominate even in spec-racing, but I reckon if you give a whole grid of drivers the same opportunities, the same experiences, and trust that they put the same amount of effort, they will be really close together in terms of pace in a spec-series
You only wrote this when you saw the word "study" :sly:.
:lol::lol::lol:
 
Oh yeah, the ford is definitely punching above the grade its in. It can corner almost as well as the ft1, yet accelerates faster and has a higher top speed. It needs reigning in.

Here is my FT1 run if your interested.


I watched your lap and it looked very good and smooth, I saw some points where I can improve and definitely gain time. In every sector I approximately lost 0.3-0.5 Seconds at least. And it was not only due to lack of speed. You just drove well, good job 👍
 
Edit: whoops

Honestly, I think that is true. The reason why there aren't so many Sennas and Hamiltons in the world is because of opportunities, or lack thereof, than talent. Not everyone starts karting at the age of 2, not everyone gets their talent recognized by the best teams, and not everyone has an equal amount of time that they can devote to racing. If I have to label anything as a talent, it is the rate of which people learn new stuff. This may be why some people still dominate even in spec-racing, but I reckon if you give a whole grid of drivers the same opportunities, the same experiences, and trust that they put the same amount of effort, they will be really close together in terms of pace in a spec-series

:lol::lol::lol:
So someone like Lance Stroll or Jolyon Palmer, two guys with basically infinite resources and all the opportunity in the world, why wouldn’t they just “work a little harder” and become as good as Hamilton?
 
Edit: whoops


So someone like Lance Stroll or Jolyon Palmer, two guys with basically infinite resources and all the opportunity in the world, why wouldn’t they just “work a little harder” and become as good as Hamilton?
Not sure what you mean by that? What are these "steps" and "things" you speak of?
 
Not sure what you mean by that? What are these "steps" and "things" you speak of?
I was going to write something, then decided not to, but the page saved what I wrote dispite me erasing it. When I responded to alpha, it reappeared at the top above his quote, and I didn’t see it until it posted. Was a mistake, forget it even happened :lol:

Edit:
You mean kinda like Rosberg did.
There’s nothing to indicate that Rosberg didn’t also have some natural ability which he combined with hard work.
 
I was going to write something, then decided not to, but the page saved what I wrote dispite me erasing it. When I responded to alpha, it reappeared at the top above his quote, and I didn’t see it until it posted. Was a mistake, forget it even happened :lol:
So am I what you are speaking of? Or is it rhetoric? To say all you have to do is try. Or does it require steps and things? What is it you are really trying to say?
 
So someone like Lance Stroll or Jolyon Palmer, two guys with basically infinite resources and all the opportunity in the world, why wouldn’t they just “work a little harder” and become as good as Hamilton?
"Not everyone starts karting at the age of 2"
Karting from a very young age is an irreplaceable opportunity that cannot be made up for in any way. Lance Stroll started at 10, but Senna and Hamilton started at half that age

Like shottah said though, you can still do the Rosberg route to win. He was so focused in winning that his very daily routine revolves around racing. No distractions, no whatsoever. He's the epitome of effort
 
Last edited:
So am I what you are speaking of? Or is it rhetoric? To say all you have to do is try. Or does it require steps and things? What is it you are really trying to say?
I don’t remember what I was trying to say in that specific post, which is why I never finished writing it, deleted it, and didn’t mean to post it, and asked you to forget it actually uploaded as that was a mistake.

It was something along the lines of:
-you took 2 years of practice to get to the top 10.
-if 100, or 1000 people all did the exact same steps and things you did to get better, who would be in the top 10?
 
I'm not a fast driver, but quick enough among the players in Asia/Oceania. In saying that, I havev come close to top 10. Certainly, I could have put in the time to shave off the tenths or full seconds. I am not lazy. That has been fine for me.

I also seriously doubt many can copy someone like a Scott McLaughlin with 16 pole positions last year enroute to better it this year, in VASC. Those type of racers are once every so often. Jamie Whincup has won 7 Championships. He's racing top drivers. They can't copy that, as hard as they do work.

I like a saying in the Anthony Hopkins movie, The Edge, "What one man can do, another can do!". It's truth, for most things, but not all things.
 
I don’t remember what I was trying to say in that specific post, which is why I never finished writing it, deleted it, and didn’t mean to post it, and asked you to forget it actually uploaded as that was a mistake.

It was something along the lines of:
-you took 2 years of practice to get to the top 10.
-if 100, or 1000 people all did the exact same steps and things you did to get better, who would be in the top 10?
That is a lot of variables of what if...I am a part of the weekly race series and love it. It has helped me more than by just watching the fastest guys go around a track. I have actually raced with them and have learned so much more than just setting the fastest lap.
 
There’s nothing to indicate that Rosberg didn’t also have some natural ability which he combined with hard work.
And i think that is exactly what it is, it's alway a combination, one of many things. Time, effort, mindset, practice, talent, knowledge, physical or mental ability's, experience and probably many more things. All these things together determine ones potential to perform. Talent alone is just a very small factor in that equation, you cant do top10 on talent alone, talent alone wont get you nowhere, but it is the icing on the cake, that little extra that is rare and very powerfull in combination with all the other ingredients for succes. Thats why there are still quite allot of people who can get close to the limit and get a top10 or close to that and then there is only a very few who can consintently beat that by a few tenths or even a second depending on track.
 
And i think that is exactly what it is, it's alway a combination, one of many things. Time, effort, mindset, practice, talent, knowledge, physical or mental ability's, experience and probably many more things. All these things together determine ones potential to perform. Talent alone is just a very small factor in that equation, you cant do top10 on talent alone, talent alone wont get you nowhere, but it is the icing on the cake, that little extra that is rare and very powerfull in combination with all the other ingredients for succes. Thats why there are still quite allot of people who can get close to the limit and get a top10 or close to that and then there is only a very few who can consintently beat that by a few tenths or even a second depending on track.
That’s basically what I’ve been saying. Some people have natural talent, others don’t. The talent, or skill, or genetics, whatever you want to call it, combined with hard work, dedication, practice, etc, can elevate those people to heights that others, who are not “blessed” :lol: in the same way, simply cannot reach, regardless of how much effort, practice, and hard work they put in. Like you say, the natural ability is the icing on the cake, but it does help, especially when talking about micro-gains at the pointy end of the leaderboards.
 
I've seen smaller grids in real life. I'll have that win, thank you.
Dj-gpqvUwAAgeU3

Dj-g1OVUYAIzQ-D


Oh yeah. I got a penalty
Dj-k4vHV4AIcGCX


But not this one
Dj-lJAqU0AQlSTO
 
That’s basically what I’ve been saying. Some people have natural talent, others don’t. The talent, or skill, or genetics, whatever you want to call it, combined with hard work, dedication, practice, etc, can elevate those people to heights that others, who are not “blessed” :lol: in the same way, simply cannot reach, regardless of how much effort, practice, and hard work they put in. Like you say, the natural ability is the icing on the cake, but it does help, especially when talking about micro-gains at the pointy end of the leaderboards.
Nm
 
That’s basically what I’ve been saying. Some people have natural talent, others don’t. The talent, or skill, or genetics, whatever you want to call it, combined with hard work, dedication, practice, etc, can elevate those people to heights that others, who are not “blessed” :lol: in the same way, simply cannot reach, regardless of how much effort, practice, and hard work they put in. Like you say, the natural ability is the icing on the cake, but it does help, especially when talking about micro-gains at the pointy end of the leaderboards.
Yes especially with the last micro gains at the very pointy end of the leaderbord. Those last couple tenths to get P1 or top 5, on a consistent basis, that's the talent of the blessed :p Up till a couple of tenths from that the hard work and effort counts way way more. I think even enough so to make top10 sometimes.
 
Yes especially with the last micro gains at the very pointy end of the leaderbord. Those last couple tenths to get P1 or top 5, on a consistent basis, that's the talent of the blessed :p Up till a couple of tenths from that the hard work and effort counts way way more. I think even enough so to make top10 sometimes.
Depends how many of the blessed show up that week I guess.
 
same track, same car, same wheel setup, it looks like no change my side. Why 1.5 sec slower after last updates on beg of August?
Can't believe it is only related to the tires pickup if you slightly go out of the best trajectory... I believe they have heavily modified something inside the code.. Has anyone of you the same feeling?
 
Its cute how people like twitcher deliberately turns my initial argument upside down and brings real racing into play in order to bolster their weak premise time and time again. When i've clearly stated from the beginning that real racing is something entirely different and has nothing to do with my conjecture.

For the last time: its absolutely within the realm of plausability that an average joe, given enough time and hard work, may one day achieve top 10 in GTS. And its completely irrelevant if this person has a diminished retention rate compared to a prodigy and would reach that goal 25% (or whatever) slower. The key point is that its possible.

Ergo, when somebody claims to have plateaued, being considerably off pace, likely running various aids that inherently inhibits his progression, yes i think its a legitimate modus operandi to call him out on it, with the explanation -- him/her being lazy. Because ultimately when one gives up on improving based on the belief of having plateaued, this in itself is a clear cut excuse for not bothering to work hard to overcome a hurdle. Its like saying: oh heck, i don't understand these partial differential equations, i think i have plateaued in my studies, i better drop out from uni to flip burgers. Its comically dichotomous. My answer to that would be: either you're stupid or you're lazy, and since you're not stupid...
 
Its cute how people like twitcher deliberately turns my initial argument upside down and brings real racing into play in order to bolster their weak premise time and time again. When i've clearly stated from the beginning that real racing is something entirely different and has nothing to do with my conjecture.

For the last time: its absolutely within the realm of plausability that an average joe, given enough time and hard work, may one day achieve top 10 in GTS. And its completely irrelevant if this person has a diminished retention rate compared to a prodigy and would reach that goal 25% (or whatever) slower. The key point is that its possible.

Ergo, when somebody claims to have plateaued, being considerably off pace, likely running various aids that inherently inhibits his progression, yes i think its a legitimate modus operandi to call him out on it, with the explanation -- him/her being lazy. Because ultimately when one gives up on improving based on the belief of having plateaued, this in itself is a clear cut excuse for not bothering to work hard to overcome a hurdle. Its like saying: oh heck, i don't understand these partial differential equations, i think i have plateaued in my studies, i better drop out from uni to flip burgers. Its comically dichotomous. My answer to that would be: either you're stupid or you're lazy, and since you're not stupid...
I wholeheartedly agree with you, except for the lazy part. You're not wrong that without the needed effort it's only natural that you cannot make it into the Top 10, but the reasons for not putting down the effort may be something other than laziness. It could be work, family, or in my case, school and studying for entrance exams. Maybe priority is also a factor here, since I give around an equal priority to my schoolwork and GTS it could be why I get the occassional Top 10. If I were to reword your last paragraph, it'd be something like this:

Saying that you've plateued is saying that you've given up. Whether be it by laziness or priorities, the fact that you gave up is still there. If you really wanted to improve, there will always be a way to do so.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back