For example, if I was strictly dependent on scientific evidence to form conclusions I of course would have to assess and evaluate that evidence to arrive at a conclusion. I would not let any other reasoning effect my process. With that said, if my buddy did come into my basement and said, "Hey, it's nice outside, lets grab our gear and hit the mountain!", before I agreed to doing that, I would have to go outside and evaluate the weather myself before I agreed to doing that. However, me being me, and with no reason to doubt my buddy, I would agree to go because I believed that what he was telling me to be true. Now granted, that is an oversimplification of what we are talking about here, and I would surely have that evidence once I looked outside to be able to confirm my belief, but isn't that not that far away from what we are doing in life? When I die, if my belief is correct, I will have my undeniable confirmation about my belief if I'm correct. If my belief is wrong, I really can't speculate with any certainty what happens. There's all kinds of theories but there is no scientific evidence of a soul and medically speaking we are just brain dead and the essence of our being just ceases to exist. Science can speculate why the human body weighs less after the body function stops, people have reported out of body experiences when they have died and have been revived, but there is no unequivocal scientific explanation. Did that answer your question on my thoughts and opinion?
Scientific journals also say that these findings are subjective and not inclusive. 
