I get noticeable amount of steen tearing on Cape Ring. Alone.
On "heavy" tracks like Rome or Madrid, the amount of tearing is just insane.
When I'm a bit tired, this combination of unstable fps and tearing even causes headaches.
Oh, and I'm sick of that 30fps "the eye can't see" BS. The difference between 30fps and 60fps is FREAKIN' HUGE. And you can still perceive differences up to 120fps, even if, admittedly, it's much more subtle.
I seriously don't get why people see a huge difference, the only true moments in which I sense that the frame drops is in SSR11 rain, and Nurburgring rain, I'm playing Cape Ring at this moment and I don't see the frame drop.
Yes there is a difference between 30fps and 60fps, but the drop is hardly noticeable when there are several elements on screen, needless to say, is even more unnoticeable when you driving, I'm also aware that this differ from person to person, so it could be me, but is not catastrophe as a lot of people claim.
However, I must say that the whole superior 60fps against 30fps counter argument falls flat because there are no dynamic light situations on FM, there are significant reduced particle effects on FM and the tracks and geometries are more simple(doesn't apply to all tracks, because some of them are ported from GT4, however that doesn't exclude Suzuka, and of course London, which has a higher amount of elements on screen compared to NY circuit in FM, which can be consider as the most complex circuit).
jabofu
He said the best he did was to overtake 19 cars in one lap. In another Interview or this, he said that they arent limited with the number of cars on track, but as i stated before, they choose the number of cars that make sense.
Doesn't apply, he said that 19 cars can be overtaken on the track(which seems more like cars that were lapped before), he didn't anything say about 19 cars on the track, apart from that, I wont buy such claims until footage of +12 cars on track is shown.
You still cant dismiss the fact that there are about 200 Premiums in GT5 and not every single one has the great quality you talk about (look of my comparision of Nissan GTR34 on gtplanet). FM 4 will have over 500 cars with cockpit and they look very good from what we have seen yet. The biggest problem of FM3 was the lighting that crippled down some nice looking interiors. A low number of cars in a game can be compensated by a good variety, GT5s premium department lacks of it. They even didnt included icons like the Toyota Supra MarkIV or the Bugatti Veyron.
I'm not mentioning anything about the quality of the GT5 models, and there aren't any profs that 600 cars will be on FM4, needless to say, thus far around 80 models had been shown, with really good quality I admit, but that doesn't take away the fact that most of the cockpits in FM3 were really low poly and really poor in comparison to GT's and even other games like Dirt and Shift(i.e. BMW M3 ALMS, GT-R Calsonic and the Honda fit, just to name a few).
