Ford Mustang VS Chevrolet Camaro

  • Thread starter Thread starter JCE
  • 243 comments
  • 9,879 views

Ford Mustang VS Chevrolet Camaro


  • Total voters
    84
87chevy
sorry man, Camaro has always been somewhat sporty looking. Unlike those fugly Fox Body 'stangs. but looks dont make the car.

I'm going Camaro. I'm just a Chevy guy and Camaro and Vette lover. And I've always preffered the sound of Chevy V8 to the Ford.

This is why I said the Mustang looked good over MOST generations. I owned a 3rd generation Camaro so I'm not denying that it looked better than that generation Mustang. However, the late 80's early 90's foxbody were not ugly. You can't sit there and tell me that this looks like a Us-spec **** Escort:

d3_3.JPG


56_3.JPG


c6_12.JPG


I'm sorry but these are hardly "not sporty".
 
LeadSlead#2
you should NOT have included that last one

Why? My brother owned 2 1993 5.0's just like that--one white and one maroon. I don't think it looks as bad as people think...
 
I actually preferred the last one.

I didn't like the lip spoilers, and preferred the notchback.

I see not enough car wrapped around a really fun little engine, works for me.
 
I do see the escort in them but they all look good to me but the last one. I think its just that it dosen't have a spoiler that makes it look funny.
 
The late '80s/ early '90's Foxes weren't that bad. My Dad had an '89 GT 5.0 with the stick, and granted it fell apart before he could have fun with it, it was a fast car nonetheless.
 
YSSMAN
The late '80s/ early '90's Foxes weren't that bad. My Dad had an '89 GT 5.0 with the stick, and granted it fell apart before he could have fun with it, it was a fast car nonetheless.

Fell apart? You'll have to explain that a bit. Those engines were like the GM V8's at the time...bulletproof. You could beat the hell out of the Ford 302 and it would still run. If anything was the problem it had to of been the manual transmission...Ford's transmissions are known to suck in those years.

Oh and it's great that it's at a tie for the last day or so. 👍
 
Mustang.. all the way.
Camaros and Firebirds are great, but in thier last year of production, they got spanked royally.
The king of the Hill 35 Anni SS and T/A got straight whooped by the 2003 Cobras.
And while Camaros where introduced later, they wheren't as good sellers. Ford Msutang is the best selling car in America, period. It has sold the most of any car in this country. The new 05+ are nothing short of awesome, and the new GT500s are set to raise the bar very high for the Challenger and Camaro.

And the Shelby mustangs, they where above the Camaro's of the time, the Shelby's where meant to take out the racing vettes. And they did.
And watch the current Grand-Am Racing series, last season the Mustangs cleaned up pretty well. Even with an SRA while the BMWs and Porsches had IRS....

I remember I drove my first stang, it felt like a car with heritage, with something behind it.
My first Camaro, it felt like a quick consumer car. Nothing more.


As for the new Camaros beating on the new stangs, I don't see it happening.
Granted the Gt500 is pricey, but 500 hp, GM own't make a camaro with similar hp to thier vette....
and the mustang GTs are priced very well. For $26,000 you get 300 hp, .90 on the skidpad, 5 speed, and a load of fun.
I dont' think Chevy will be able to touch that.
Plus there is one word that sums it all up.....
mullet.....
 
Lets see:

First the paint started to peel off on the bumpers and then the rear quarter pannels. Then had had some clutch problems, of which he never fixed before he sold it. Then there was the time that the front fender came unhooked, breaking the front driver's side that would have held the foglights. Then there was the winter driving, which my Dad still thinks was horrible (I think he is lying).

He got a good deal on it early on in the spring of 1990, and from what I remember we didn't have it too long. I wan't to say it was gone by the spring of 1991, as he wen't back to his 305-powered Caprice quite quickly.
 
Mustang FTW! I agree to an extent with the comment about GM not trying to match the Vette's output...but knowing GM they will get very close. You remember the 2002 TA WS6 and SS Camaro were only 10bhp less than the C5. I see the GM pushing close to 480-490bhp with the new Z28. But we will see, thing is the new Camaro looks brilliant...no one can deny that. I would love to own one...but I just like the Mustang more in it's later years.

Camaro = loved more 1st & 3rd gens
Mustang = loved more 2nd & 4th gens
 
331 Boss
Mustang.. all the way.
Camaros and Firebirds are great, but in thier last year of production, they got spanked royally.
The king of the Hill 35 Anni SS and T/A got straight whooped by the 2003 Cobras.
And while Camaros where introduced later, they wheren't as good sellers. Ford Msutang is the best selling car in America, period. It has sold the most of any car in this country. The new 05+ are nothing short of awesome, and the new GT500s are set to raise the bar very high for the Challenger and Camaro.

And the Shelby mustangs, they where above the Camaro's of the time, the Shelby's where meant to take out the racing vettes. And they did.
And watch the current Grand-Am Racing series, last season the Mustangs cleaned up pretty well. Even with an SRA while the BMWs and Porsches had IRS....

I remember I drove my first stang, it felt like a car with heritage, with something behind it.
My first Camaro, it felt like a quick consumer car. Nothing more.


As for the new Camaros beating on the new stangs, I don't see it happening.
Granted the Gt500 is pricey, but 500 hp, GM own't make a camaro with similar hp to thier vette....
and the mustang GTs are priced very well. For $26,000 you get 300 hp, .90 on the skidpad, 5 speed, and a load of fun.
I dont' think Chevy will be able to touch that.
Plus there is one word that sums it all up.....
mullet.....

Mustang FTW! I agree to an extent with the comment about GM not trying to match the Vette's output...but knowing GM they will get very close. You remember the 2002 TA WS6 and SS Camaro were only 10bhp less than the C5. I see the GM pushing close to 480-490bhp with the new Z28. But we will see, thing is the new Camaro looks brilliant...no one can deny that. I would love to own one...but I just like the Mustang more in it's later years.

Camaro = loved more 1st & 3rd gens
Mustang = loved more 2nd & 4th gens

YSSMAN
Lets see:

First the paint started to peel off on the bumpers and then the rear quarter pannels. Then had had some clutch problems, of which he never fixed before he sold it. Then there was the time that the front fender came unhooked, breaking the front driver's side that would have held the foglights. Then there was the winter driving, which my Dad still thinks was horrible (I think he is lying).

He got a good deal on it early on in the spring of 1990, and from what I remember we didn't have it too long. I wan't to say it was gone by the spring of 1991, as he wen't back to his 305-powered Caprice quite quickly.


Well, the bodywork sucked on both the F-body and foxbody of those years. My Camaro fell apart on everything but the drivetrain. Hell, my suspension in the rear was metal hitting metal because the springs and shocks were shot to hell. And not to mention my transmission mount broke and everytime you'd do a medium-hard acceleration you'd feel a *THUNK* against the floor. Just my opinion, but both these cars in the 80's and early 90's weren't very well put together. That is except for the drivetrains minus the Ford manual transmission.
 
Wow, I don't think I've had to deal with this much blinded bias since my last confrontation with Master_Yoda, so here it goes:

331 Boss
Mustang.. all the way.
Camaros and Firebirds are great, but in thier last year of production, they got spanked royally.
The king of the Hill 35 Anni SS and T/A got straight whooped by the 2003 Cobras.

Umm, the last year for production on the F-Body was 2002, and up untill then, the Camaro Z/28 and the Firebird Trans-Am were laying a whooping down on not only the GT, but the SVT Cobra as well. Not only where they cheaper, they handeled better, and had better fuel mileage.

And while Camaros where introduced later, they wheren't as good sellers. Ford Msutang is the best selling car in America, period. It has sold the most of any car in this country. The new 05+ are nothing short of awesome, and the new GT500s are set to raise the bar very high for the Challenger and Camaro.

I belive that as a startup vehicle, the Camaro and Firebird surprised Ford just a bit with their rather quick sales figures. The Camaro nearly hit a million models by the end of the first generation, add the Firebird to the mix, and well, you outsold the Mustang.

And what exactly did the GT500 raise the bar on? The Corvette is cheaper and faster, and it does so without forced induction, thus down 100 BHP. Hell, if anything the GT500 was underwhelming in the performance category, with the bad understeer and the "pushy" feeling with the big 5.4L hanging off the front axle.

And the Shelby mustangs, they where above the Camaro's of the time, the Shelby's where meant to take out the racing vettes. And they did.
And watch the current Grand-Am Racing series, last season the Mustangs cleaned up pretty well. Even with an SRA while the BMWs and Porsches had IRS....

Ha, that one made me laugh! Hey, remember that time when the Mustang BOSS 302 was the dominant car in Trans Am and then the Z/28 showed up? Ohh yeah, that was embarassingly funny. Oh, and the COPO 427 Camaro? What was that? It not only could turn left and right but had a healthy 450+BHP V8 under the hood, and it was what? Made of aluminum?

Seriously kid, you might want to learn a bit about the history of the racing models before you go blabbering about. Granted, Shelby made some quick cars, but the Z/28 and SS models were just as fast, and you cannot count out the COPO 427 either.

I remember I drove my first stang, it felt like a car with heritage, with something behind it.
My first Camaro, it felt like a quick consumer car. Nothing more.

Ah, but you see that is your opinion. There are plenty of folks who would disagree, and I'd say the Camaro (atleast in it's later generations) was far better equipped on the inside than it's Fox compeditor. Of course, you have to compare apples to apples here, thus V6 RS' aren't in the same league as GTs and SVTs.


As for the new Camaros beating on the new stangs, I don't see it happening.
Granted the Gt500 is pricey, but 500 hp, GM own't make a camaro with similar hp to thier vette....
and the mustang GTs are priced very well. For $26,000 you get 300 hp, .90 on the skidpad, 5 speed, and a load of fun.
I dont' think Chevy will be able to touch that.
Plus there is one word that sums it all up.....
mullet.....

It wouldn't take much for Chevrolet to beat up on the Mustang, quite frankly. Given that nearly every V8 that is theoretically possible to install in the Zeta-bodied Camaro makes not only more power than the 4.6L mill, there would also be a 6-speed manual or automatic behind it, making it a VERY tough car to beat not only on a track, but at the strip as well. And I wouldn't count out a 500 BHP Camaro either, as it will be heavier than the Corvette, thus it won't be a performance threat. Added to that, there is that whole 600-650+ BHP "Corvette Blue Devil" thing, yeah, the one that was confirmed a few months ago. Yeah, that would mean the LS7 would certainly be going in the Camaro.

...And if you want to talk pricing, well, Chevrolet is ready to play hardball there. Chances are, base V6 Camaros will start right around $20K with a more powerful V6 and a more complicated 6-speed manual or automatic. We are talking about anywhere from 240-270 BHP V6 here, so it would allready be knocking on the Mustang GT's door there. Then there would be the mid-range Z/28, presumably packaged with either the 325 BHP Vortec 5.3 DOD V8 or the 350 BHP L76 6.0L V8 with either a six-speed manual or automatic, again trumping the Mustang once again. Then there would be the SS, starting around $30K with the 400 BHP LS2 V8 from the Corvette, same transmissions as before, and presumably would be able to knock on the "Special Eddition" Mustangs that are supposed to have more power. Then, of course, the $40K-ish LS7-powered Camaro ZL1s with 500 BHP on tap. Not only would they be ligher and faster than the Mustang, but cheaper as well.

Mullets? You do realise you are defending the Mustang right? There are pletny of trailer parks that are littered with Mustangs on cinderblocks, mullet-haired owners and all. The Camaro and Mustang BOTH represent some part of redneck culture, so that isn't even worth bringing up there.

---

BTW: JCE3000GT, I think we've found our flame war we've been looking for!
 
YSSMAN
BTW: JCE3000GT, I think we've found our flame war we've been looking for!

Then let's get a mod to lock it quick! It's been too good of a thread to let this happen.

Oh and Mustang FTW! :sly:
 
I kinda want him to come back and get pissed...

Ever since that whole "Tolerance" thing happened, the flame wars stopped. I miss them!!!
 
331 Boss
Mustang.. all the way.
Camaros and Firebirds are great, but in thier last year of production, they got spanked royally.
The king of the Hill 35 Anni SS and T/A got straight whooped by the 2003 Cobras.

wait... so a 2002 Camaro and Firebird got whooped by a Mustang that didnt exist yet???
last I heard, comparing a 2002 to a 2003, wasnt comparing 2 cars in the same year of production:rolleyes:
The Firebird's and Camaro's went out on top, performance wise, slaughtering 02 SVT Cobra's, in every way. every way but sales, that is.

EDIT: and NOW I read yssman's post...... oh well.
it almost seems as though this 331 guys just cracking jokes. that or he read muscle mustangs and fast fords, when they did a comparo of an 03 Cobra, to a 02 Camaro, cause it was the first time they could claim mustangs were faster...well...........maybe ever.
to their distraught, the SS ran high 12's, only .3 behind the "awesome", boosted, cobra
 
LeadSlead#2
wait... so a 2002 Camaro and Firebird got whooped by a Mustang that didnt exist yet???
last I heard, comparing a 2002 to a 2003, wasnt comparing 2 cars in the same year of production:rolleyes:
The Firebird's and Camaro's went out on top, performance wise, slaughtering 02 SVT Cobra's, in every way. every way but sales, that is.

Yes, if GM would of kept the F-body one more year (I would of liked them to not stop production personally) the Cobra would of basically rendered the WS6 and SS 2nd place. But it didn't happen so no reason to start guessing. :lol:

YSSMAN
I kinda want him to come back and get pissed...

Ever since that whole "Tolerance" thing happened, the flame wars stopped. I miss them!!!

I don't like flame wars...you see how much better this topic is for not having one in it? It's been informative and very civil which is how it should be shouldn't it? I've left automotive forums because of the constant flaming and hardcore bickering. Friendly cordial debate or playful banter is always better.
 
JCE3000GT
Yes, if GM would of kept the F-body one more year (I would of liked them to not stop production personally) the Cobra would of basically rendered the WS6 and SS 2nd place. But it didn't happen so no reason to start guessing. :lol:

Well, that is a tough one to call if they would have continued into 2003. Granted the SVT would have undoubtedly been faster, it really was not a HUGE jump in performance, but it was of course enough to make a difference. The price increase would have also put more weight on the F-Body as well, but the top-line 325 BHP SS or WS6 can't match the extra 65 BHP that the Cobra had.

...But if production had continued, I wouldn't have been surprised to see GMPD get their hands on the two cars, maybe toy with the idea of an IRS or a signifigantly updated LRA, but the big addition would have been the CTS-V's version of the LS6 with 400 BHP. That theoretically would have evened the game up just a bit, and thus, a very tough call to make indeed.
 
But the bad thing is we will never know...and I for one will be sad that it never happend. Stopping the Pony wars before it got a good head of steam was a mistake by GM. Can you possibly imagine if GM and Ford kept trying to outdo themselves? I think it would of be FANTASTIC! And the '04 SVT Cobra sold for around $33k-35k depending on options. While doing some ACT! databasing work for my step-dad I saw about 5 '04 SVT Cobras going for $33k-35k.
 
a6m5
Don't laugh. This was one of my childhood favorite cars.
iroc.jpg

It was so hard to find a picture of this car without trailer home or bunch of guys holding beer cans around it. :p

I like that Camaro but then ultimately, I voted for Mustang. It changed the "affordable sports-car" segment and that's the reason for its success; Camaro came late to the scene, and was sort of ordinary.
 
Yeah, I seem to recall that the difference wasn't huge in price between the outgoing SS and Cobra, give or take about a grand or two. When the GTO showed up however, the game changed I think. The GTO's arrival demanded more quality at a lower price, and even when down 40 BHP and up a few hundred pounds on the Cobra, the GTO was pretty quick by comparison.

But I completely agree that the F-Body was killed to quickly. I think they could have easily pulled a "shocker" on the GM fanbase by saying that they could cancel it if sales didn't increase, then slowly back off the production numbers to match demand.

The Camaro and Firebird, quite simply, were overproduced to meet the demands of their customers. Added to that, pricing was a bit high, thus missing the core 19-34 yo market that the cars were designed for.

GM won't make the same mistake again with the Camaro, and thus the rest of the high-performance Zeta models. They are dead-set on topping the Mustang in every concieveable category, and the only thing really standing in their way is indeed the Dodge Challenger.
 
The '04 GTO vs '04 Cobra wasn't that fair of a comparison...the Cobra was so much faster but the GTO I believe to handle better--and I think the Monaro looks better than the Cobra but alas GM screwed up the front bumper of the Monaro/GTO. Then in 2005 GM stuffed the LS2 in the GTO and that would of been a Cobra killer...but the Cobra went out of production for the 2005 model year. :lol: Jeez can we get some Pony car wars GM and Ford? They keep toying with us...
 
The Cobra wasn't miles ahead of the GTO in straight-line performance, but the GTO sure as hell was easier to drive, thus it won over the hearts of most of the folks who reviewed it.

It would have been funnier to see the duel happen with the folks from Top Gear behind the wheel, IMO, as they probably would have scoffed at the Mustang whenever possible for it's classically American heavy clutch, poor seating position, awkward shifter, overweight steering, etc.

But the cars were equals, IMO, and it would come down to how YOU would want to be percieved in the eyes of others when you picked one.

Me? Obviously the GTO, but the Mustang still holds a special place in my heart after the Camaro died. But, I'd choose refinement and overall good capability versus absolute brawn in every circumstance. But hey, thats just my opinion...
 
There's only 1 reason why I would of chosen the 2004 Cobra over the 2004 GTO...one and only one...this:

ZO6 vs Cobra - Listen to the first 3 seconds...that supercharger whine is ****ING INTOXICATING. NO OTHER FORCED INDUCTION SOUNDS BETTER THAN THAT TO ME...NOTHING. I get the same feeling listening to the Carrera GT and Zonda...just such an awsome noise.

Anyway, I'd probably buy the GTO in the end because of the insurance being 30% cheaper...and the GTO looks better...especially when I call a Holden dealer in AUS and have them send me a Monaro front bumper. :sly:

*edit*
Note: That mp3 is my ringtone for when I get a voicemail. :sly:
 
I still think one of the best Vette versus Cobra stories I read was the last one from Car and Driver. Wow, I didn't expect them to not like the Cobra as much as they did. As they said, the Corvette wen't into the comparo down 20 points, and if I remember correctly, came out 30 points ahead.

...and 331 Boss thinks nothing with match the GT500. Ha!
 
I don't agree with you at all about the GT500. It's brilliant...it looks so much better than the Vette...and screw the ZO6 give me something with the Shelby snake. I don't care that it's numbers can't compete with the supercar-like ZO6, this is one case where LOOKS has me sold more than power. Mustang FTW! AGAIN! WOOT!
 
Heres the thing though, I'm not talking about Z06 versus Cobra here, I'm talking C6 Z51 (for a touch over $43K) versus the Cobra (at nearly $50K). If we added the Z06 to the mix, it just wouldn't be a fair fight. If anything, it would be a bloodbath for the Mustang, it simply couldn't win.

But my beef with the Mustang is that it's performance in just underwhelming despite the fact that it has the magic 500 BHP. The 0-60 and quarter-mile times aren't much better than the Subaru STi (down 200 BHP), and if were going to compare price/performance, it would put it next to the Cadillac CTS-V. Added to that, the top speed of the Cobra is limited to 155 MPH, hell, the old F-Body could do over 160 MPH without problems. Adding insult to injury is the 1:33 Grattan lap time, bested by the '06 Dodge Charger SRT-8 at 1:32, and that is not only larger and heavier, but also down on 75 BHP and matched to a slushbox.

But understand this, I don't hate the GT500. I'm just dissapointed.
 
Back