Funny Pic Thread (Episode III: Revenge of the ****)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ceiling_fan
  • 4,972 comments
  • 346,065 views
Status
Not open for further replies.
Except it's not really a lamp, it really is a women's private parts... Someone posted the original on another forum I browse, and while there's no nudity I don't feel like posting it.
 
Except it's not really a lamp, it really is a women's private parts... Someone posted the original on another forum I browse, and while there's no nudity I don't feel like posting it.

Yeah, and she has a fern tatooed on her ass. :odd:
 
Was it really necessary to darken the spots on either side of the base of the lamp diffuser?
 
If that's not a lamp, can anybody give a hint where to find the real photo then? Cause I'm still pretty convinced it is a lamp...
 
If that's not a lamp, can anybody give a hint where to find the real photo then? Cause I'm still pretty convinced it is a lamp...
Except it's not really a lamp, it really is a women's private parts... Someone posted the original on another forum I browse, and while there's no nudity I don't feel like posting it.

Well............ :rolleyes:
That was a really good double take, but the tattoo on her calf/butt really gives it away....... :D
(or...... do I smell sarcasm here?)
 
I don't see no proof, just a bunch of words anybody could post here. Sorry Fred, I need some proof (per pm?)!
 
Well the...the...the...the black bit really does not look like a womens...va...va..va...you know what. To me the va...va...va...thing looks to wide and the inside of the va...va...va...thing looks to pitch black to be a womens...va...va...va...thing...however I have never seen a womens...va...va...va...thing before so I wouldn't know what a womens va...va...va...thing looks like. I am pretty sure is a lamp and not a womes...va...va...va...thing!
 
myspace-funny-comments-2.jpg
 
About the lamp: thanks to daan, I was convinced this actually is the part of a woman. It's not even photoshopped, it's just cleverly cut and upside down.
 
About the lamp: thanks to daan, I was convinced this actually is the part of a woman. It's not even photoshopped, it's just cleverly cut and upside down.

The one I found also appears to have some sort of oil filter/smudge thing going on.
 
Not that I'm in the habit of sending half naked women to random members in PMs...

EDIT: Hmmm, that's intriguing, Loon. I'm going to have to study them closer...
 
He needs to see a speech therapist, that's for sure.

Reminds me of an old joke:

Gareth Gates walks in to a sweet shop and comes out with 50 bags of M&M's. All he wanted was a Mars bar.
 
Not that I'm in the habit of sending half naked women to random members in PMs...
I'm not random, you can send it to me. I'll judge whether it's real or not. :D
 
I've sent so many pics of a half naked lady to folk this evening that I'm going to have to give myself an infraction now.
 
daan & Loon - Thanks, guys.

Well, it's clearly a woman. Only the final result seen on the "lamp" photo has A LOT of photoshop done to it (quality work, may I add). But great result, nevertheless.
 
May I ask where there's any photoshopping? I don't see any changes in color, brightness, contrast, gradient or shape. :confused:
 
pm'ing me should work flawlessly, I have loads of space in my inbox, and daan pm'ed me twice today. :confused:

Anyway, daan just sent me more pictures, which showed that there actually has been severe photoshopping. In the first pic the naughty mod ( :D ) sent me, you couldn't see any of that. I'm soooooooo convinced now! :O
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back