Believe it or not, I have better things to do with my time than talking to a GT7 subforum regular about something where every previous time the topic has come up no matter how many people have attempted to discuss their issues with the program it has bounced off you like hitting a wall. I spent most of my weekend working on my
actual car, in fact.
And yet you refuse the same consideration to be applied to yourself.
Yes, when the person doing the correcting is both heavily biased against the argument they are correcting and also sorely lacking when it comes to the knowledge required to do the correcting in the first place.
Or is this not the VinylRichie who blindly insisted that the VGT program cars have all had extensive real life development work from the car manufacturers before they even got to PD:
Even the ones "made" by companies that haven't existed for decades, the ones "made" by shoe manufacturers, the ones with impossible propulsion systems, and the ones that were never designed with the idea that they would ever actually be sat in by a human being (nevermind driven), apparently. You don't seem to know
anything about the automotive industry beyond the marketing press releases PD force feeds you about how great the program they made is; and coattail riding off of Famine's posts in the thread won't hide that from anyone.
This has also already been explained to you many times. You throw a hissy fit literally every time the topic is raised. You ignore people's reasoning for not liking the program. You mock people for trying to explain their points. You dismiss people attempting to respond to you in good faith as arrogant, as ignorant, as selfish, as infantile. The tone of every one of your posts on the topic whenever it comes up makes your intention as clear as day that someone taking a stance against VGT cars, even when it's as minor as "I wish they only included ones that were more realistic," is some sort of drooling invalid who you are only humoring by talking to.
If you want people to stop noting that you're taking a discussion about a marketing stunt in a videogame super personally, your best bet is to stop getting really angry at everyone who doesn't immediately and unilaterally acquiesce to your viewpoint on the matter every time someone tries to talk about it. Responding to them like they have a third arm coming out of their ass also doesn't help your case in that regard.
You act like this despite making assertions about the program and its implementation that are, quite frankly,
staggering to understand with even minor critical thinking applied (like, "hmm, should the car that we are selling for millions of dollars per example be designed around a marketing tie-in for a videogame, or should we make something with the goal of selling it to the people who bought the Veyron"); but have so little self-reflection that you still insist that you are juiced-in to the automotive world and how cars come to be made.
Even after an entire thread of discussion about the literal exact topic of Vision GT influence on real cars in response to a car that was alleged to be based off a Vision GT car, you still say stuff like this:
When there's possible influence in
one car in the entirety of the program and that's questionable based on interviews from the company in question. When stuff like the Chiron would have had their designs locked in
years before it was shown off as a production car. With basic knowledge of how the industry works in all but the most extreme circumstances you would have known that,
even if you want to ignore the link that Samus provided in this thread that talks about how the design work was done in 2013. It's not
nothing for the first view the public had of the car to be Gran Turismo, but it's not
influence on the actual sold product.
In fact, I'm pretty sure you were asked several times for more than a single example of this supposed influence that you repeatedly insist across multiple threads that we should recognize as fact and you refused to provide any:
I know you think that the people trying to disagree with the topic are morons, but I'm kind of shocked that you think some of those same people are so stupid that they'd completely forget a thread you wandered out of your GT7 echo chamber to post in from barely a month ago where you said all these same easily disprovable talking points with the same condescending attitude.
Yes, I too love the VW Golf VGT cars that are exaggerated versions of the contemporary Golf VII with none of the new design elements of the Golf VIII (which instead had a dedicated teaser concept shown off a couple months afterward).
