- 819
- United States
That's not... quite the point I made.
We would very much be able to discern all of these differences. When you say "they're basically the same" that says to me you won't be able to tell the difference between them....almost everything else is basically the same size*, layout†, and engine configuration.
It'll probably drive quite like the also FR old one, sound quite like the V8 old one, and other than knowing you're in the newer car it'll be quite like driving the old one - and when it's stickered up in your favourite Red Bull/Monster Energy livery it won't even look that different.
I know you "covered" some of the vehicle changes, but the Corvette, Ferrari, M3, AM Vantage, Porsche and Mustang all feature HUGE changes in chassis, powerplants, drivetrains and layouts. Hell, you say the Mclaren is the "biggest change" when the Corvette went from FR to MR! Literally one of the largest and most publicized chassis changes in automotive history.
Without detailing everything that's hugely different in the last 5-10 years of GT series cars, my point still stands. Saying things like:
... is factually wrong, and not representative of the opinions many of us hold for good reason. BoP being a thing means nothing in the context of the differences the new cars represent....any new GT3/Gr.3 would just replace an existing one, and its performance would be dictated by the one-size-fits-all BOP. Most will drive and sound very, very similarly, and little would change except knowing that you're in a newer (but still at least two years out of date) car.
Like I said, a lot of us will appreciate the newer cars. You? Evidently, not so much. And that's why, to me, your opinion holds no weight when it comes to the importance of modern GT cars and the very valid argument that they would be important additions to GT7.