gt5 3d confirmed

[yanfloist]

I knew GT5 was delayed because of 3D tech. This is a shame.

 

[NissanSkylineN1]

You mean like the PS3 which meets the specifications for 3DBD?

But really, is anyone going to upgrade to HDMI 1.4? They're quite expensive if you buy them at stores.
I wonder if a 2d option will still be available....

 

[Griffith500]

It's HDMI 1.3, which can easily handle 720p @120 Hz

 

[Famine]

But really, is anyone going to upgrade to HDMI 1.4? They're quite expensive if you buy them at stores.
I wonder if a 2d option will still be available....

I'd just like to enquire what it is you're actually talking about now?

There are 3D sources. The PS3 is one. There are 3D panels - Sony are releasing a whole range of them on June 10th. Why is a 3D option on GT5 - which I'll note has already been implemented - a "waste of time"?

 

[NissanSkylineN1]

"The episode gives fans a quick lesson on what they'll need to prepare for 3D. The list includes: A 3D-ready TV that supports the HDMI 1.4 standard, a pair of active-shutter 3D glasses, and of course the PlayStation 3 firmware update that enables 3D playback."

I'd just like to enquire what it is you're actually talking about now?

There are 3D sources. The PS3 is one. There are 3D panels - Sony are releasing a whole range of them on June 10th. Why is a 3D option on GT5 - which I'll note has already been implemented - a "waste of time"?

Because PD has to write a computer script that will support 3D.

PS: I know, I suck at talking organized. I'm not much organized either.

 

[Famine]

Because PD has to write a computer script that will support 3D.

It's done. What's the problem?

 

[Stonemonkey]

I think you guys are missing something. 3d tv needs a 3d SOURCE. That means that the Tv does not turn the video 3d, the signal does. That means that cable or satellite is still 2d. You need to buy 3d movies to watch 3d. That means that PD is wasting time making gt5 3d because not many have 3d tv yet.

http://www.sky.com/shop/3d/home/

 

[NissanSkylineN1]

It's done. What's the problem?

It took time to make it.

 

[Griffith500]

http://3d.sky.com/pubfinder/

Incidentally, no pub match I've ever been to looks that ... "upmarket"...


It takes time to make anything

 

[Famine]

It took time to make it.

And it's not a reason why GT5 isn't in our hands yet - it takes more time to add a car to the game than include 3D support. So what's the problem?

 

[alucard0712]

I will not jump on the 3D bandwagon !

Only real life is 3D

But your eyes can see only 2D.Brain used to reconstruct the information.

So i suggest use 3D because less "brain-conversions needed"
For typical 3D game on 2D display its like: 3D (game) -> 2D (monitor,1 dimension LOST) -> (2D (eyes) -> 3D (brain) dimension reconstructed only by your imagination,FAKE)
For 3D display its like: 3D (game) -> 3D (display,you have REAL information to help reconstruct it RIGHT in 3D) -> (2D (eyes) - 3D (brain) with use of extended data,REAL).
(Last conversion is typical for us so it's natural.Automatic.)
In short: Do you see AVATAR in 3D?

Ok it's all for fun!!!Really!!!👍)))))

 

[cobraagent90]

For 3D you need 120Hz 1080p(60Hz per eye 720p per eye). So will the 3d version look worse? yes unless the ps3 can output 2160p. Still 120Hz at 1080p are A LOT even for the ps3. It will need to use at least one of the spes specificly for 3d.

 

[Griffith500]

Erm, no for 720p per eye you need only output 720p at twice the required refresh and switch between polarisation, or whatever, every other frame.

Each eye is still getting the full 720p - granted some 3DTVs use some form of interlacing, or chequerboarding, but that's then 720i per eye, unless I've missed something?

 

[cobraagent90]

Erm, no for 720p per eye you need only output 720p at twice the required refresh and switch between polarisation, or whatever, every other frame.

Each eye is still getting the full 720p - granted some 3DTVs use some form of interlacing, or chequerboarding, but that's then 720i per eye, unless I've missed something?

I think you have. According to this http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=241190 its 720p per eye

 

[alucard0712]

I can't remember that RESOULUTION in 3D being a important factor.Don't remember at all.
ITS 3D!!!If you have seen it just once you can't go back.I don't PR it.Its just so natural.CUBE now not SQUARE but REAL CUBE.And BIG cube is BIG, you don't have to think that is big or believe in it.ITS REAL BIG! (short impression).Imagine how cockpit in GT will look!How easy you can justice braking point.

 

[cobraagent90]

I can't remember that RESOULUTION in 3D being a important factor.Don't remember at all.
ITS 3D!!!If you have seen it just once you can't go back.I don't PR it.Its just so natural.CUBE now not SQUARE but REAL CUBE.And BIG cube is BIG, you don't have to think that is big or believe in it.ITS REAL BIG! (short impression).Imagine how cockpit in GT will look!How easy you can justice braking point.

The resolution is an imortant factor. But if the 3d element is done well in a game, you don't mind it being 720p(still very good)

 

[Momoniu]

Porn studios lead the stampede into 3D TV

http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/...ad-the-stampede-into-3d-tv-20100111-m19e.html

don't worry, its just a news page, all legit,

but the porn industry has interest in 3d, 3d is here to stay

 

[cobraagent90]

Porn studios lead the stampede into 3D TV

http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/...ad-the-stampede-into-3d-tv-20100111-m19e.html

don't worry, its just a news page, all legit,

but the porn industry has interest in 3d, 3d is here to stay

Sony has an interest in gaming 3d Thats why its going to stay

 

[Momoniu]

just because its sony, doesn't mean it will succeed, beta-max anyone? or how about minidisk.

when a massavely big industry like porn gets involved, by by hd-dvd

 

[alucard0712]

The resolution is an imortant factor. But if the 3d element is done well in a game, you don't mind it being 720p(still very good)

I think so too.Just don't mind, like i don't mind about resolution of 3D objects...(compared to 2D where resolution is most important technical factor)

I'd go for 60fps (120 in 3D) and 480p rather than half of this framerate at 720p.For me it's just better without a question! 👍

 

[steve30x]

The problem with the 3D technology is it doesnt work for everybody. I recently wentr to see Avatar in 3D and the 3D didnt work for me. I had to wear the 3D glasses though because the screen was slightly blurred without those goofy sunglasses type 3d Shades. Im hoping that 3D technology isnt forced onto us and we will always have the option for Normal 2D tv.

 

[cobraagent90]

I think so too.Just don't mind, like i don't mind about resolution of 3D objects...(compared to 2D where resolution is most important technical factor)

I'd go for 60fps (120 in 3D) and 480p rather than half of this framerate at 720p.For me it's just better without a question! 👍

We can have 720p per eye(1440p total) runing at 120hz games in ps3. However, these games need to push the ps3 at lets say 30% max, so the rest 60%(lets not make it 70 shall we?) needs to be left for 3d 720p at 60Hz

 

[cobraagent90]

The problem with the 3D technology is it doesnt work for everybody. I recently wentr to see Avatar in 3D and the 3D didnt work for me. I had to wear the 3D glasses though because the screen was slightly blurred without those goofy sunglasses type 3d Shades. Im hoping that 3D technology isnt forced onto us and we will always have the option for Normal 2D tv.

I have seen Avatar too and i know what you are talking about. Its because there are 2 pictures one close to each other and the glasses help separate them(one pic per eye). Only 3d games-programmes will be blurry without the glasses but i am pretty sure you will be able to choose whether you want to watch-play the 2d or 3d version

 

[Griffith500]

We can have 720p per eye(1440p total) runing at 120hz games in ps3. However, these games need to push the ps3 at lets say 30% max, so the rest 60%(lets not make it 70 shall we?) needs to be left for 3d 720p at 60Hz

It's not 1440p total. It's no different to rapidly closing one eye at a time whilst watching the screen - it's still only 720p, otherwise you could claim 2D is 1440p just because you're viewing it twice (once per eye).

It's like saying GT5 replays are only 360p because they run at 30 fps...

 

[alucard0712]

The problem with the 3D technology is it doesnt work for everybody. I recently wentr to see Avatar in 3D and the 3D didnt work for me. I had to wear the 3D glasses though because the screen was slightly blurred without those goofy sunglasses type 3d Shades. Im hoping that 3D technology isnt forced onto us and we will always have the option for Normal 2D tv.

It's matter of the distance!
Sony will have electronic 3D glasses with ton's of adjustments.So you can tweak parameters for yourself.I can guarantee it will work! 👍

 

[TokyoDrift]

The problem with the 3D technology is it doesnt work for everybody. I recently wentr to see Avatar in 3D and the 3D didnt work for me. I had to wear the 3D glasses though because the screen was slightly blurred without those goofy sunglasses type 3d Shades. Im hoping that 3D technology isnt forced onto us and we will always have the option for Normal 2D tv.

The problem is, like me, lots of people do not have 20:20 vision. As a result, 3D will be less effective for a lot of people, despite you living in a 3D world and still perceiving it as such. Also, there does seem to be a variety in the effectiveness of the source material itself.

3D on a small screen, having to wear glasses, is just something that has never appealed to me.

 

[H20HYBRID_GT]

Can someone please explain to me why you guys keep thinking 60 fps is important, when the human eye can only see something like 22 fps?
I mean, I understand everyone wants a stable framerate, so wouldn't a stable 24fps be better than an unstable 60fps?

The problem with the 3D technology is it doesnt work for everybody. I recently wentr to see Avatar in 3D and the 3D didnt work for me. I had to wear the 3D glasses though because the screen was slightly blurred without those goofy sunglasses type 3d Shades. Im hoping that 3D technology isnt forced onto us and we will always have the option for Normal 2D tv.

I have not tried it (recently), but I'm pretty sure it wouldn't work for me either.

I'm also quite sure DDD won't be a success, because it's just too weird ...

 

[Griffith500]

Depending on the background lighting, the image brightness, person's age and visual acuity, people can discern discrete frames up to and above 100 Hz.

24 fps works because the film frames are blurred, and the lighting and projection equipment (etc.) lessen the choppiness. LCD's need the source at the same as their refresh, otherwise it's choppy as hell...

 

[cobraagent90]

It's not 1440p total. It's no different to rapidly closing one eye at a time whilst watching the screen - it's still only 720p, otherwise you could claim 2D is 1440p just because you're viewing it twice (once per eye).

It's like saying GT5 replays are only 360p because they run at 30 fps...

Did you actually click on the link i gave you?

 

[Eric Demory]

The 3d feature for GT5 would also go great with the new 3d widescreen tv. If that should make a better difference, that would be the extreme drive of your life.