- 9,884
- Carthage, TN
- race_emhard
I think all my years of Chevrolet programming is coming through.
Cheap Hardly Effective Virtually Runs On Luck Every Time
I think all my years of Chevrolet programming is coming through.
Cheap Hardly Effective Virtually Runs On Luck Every Time
There's a similar one here but for Ford, a mechanic I know made laugh my ass off a couple of days ago:
FeoOrdinarioRepareDiario
Which loosely translates to "Ugly, crude, repair daily".
*puts on firesuit*
A black 1969 Mustang Fastback that looks as evil as this would be cool.
Introduce all this malarkey about "estimated" power figures, engine codes, NASCAR history, and collector's values and the car stops being a car and starts being a nostalgia trip for rich old men.
Rich old men are not cool.
The only history it has tied to NASCAR is through the Torino. Which this engine was designed for.
They've just had uncool cars for so long, they think those cars are cool.
If I remember correctly, that was the 1969 Talladega 500 where a lot of the series regulars boycotted the race due to it being unsafe, so series officials grabbed Sportsman Division drivers and had them enter their Sportsman Division cars into the 500, which included Camaros and Mustangs. Still.. that wasn't a Boss 429 either, since that was specifically for drag racing purposes.A Mustang did race in NASCAR once.
I would post a picture, but Google thinks I'm talking about either the current Nationwide series car (that isn't a Mustang at all), a pace car, or the normal production car.
watbetter suspension
I would still go pro touring on it and give it IRS.
You realize this car had top of the line suspension given what the car cost and the time period right?
Good point 👍And you realize who you're talking to? It's useless, bud. He talking about modifying a car in this thread is enough to ignore the post. He'll next go "lol pushrods". Just let it go.