GTP Cool Wall: 2012+ Morgan 3-Wheeler

  • Thread starter Thread starter White & Nerdy
  • 107 comments
  • 5,546 views

2012+ Morgan 3-Wheeler


  • Total voters
    104
  • Poll closed .
S&S X-Wedge actually. Think of it as a Harley engine, but better.
 
It's a lightweight, dedicated track car. It's odd, quirky, you may even say geeky. It's an attention grabber yet it's not ostentatious in the slightest. What others think about you driving it? If you drive this thing you're above that, you're TOO COOL, unlike that tosser in the M3.

Insta SUB ZERO.
 
Your average passer-by will probably come across a pre-war V-twin Morgan three-wheeler thinking it's one of the newer recreations.

And what a brilliant recreation it is. Just as the original was, this it solid cool retro madness. Only now it has twice the power output.
 
A 3-wheel vehicle with the wheels in the proper layout, retro looks, and lightweight. The V-twin motorcycle engine is a bit.. eh... but overall the car is cool.
 
A 3-wheel vehicle with the wheels in the proper layout, retro looks, and lightweight. The V-twin motorcycle engine is a bit.. eh... but overall the car is cool.
I don't really thing there is a "proper" layout for 3 wheels. Both one in the front or one in the back work.
 
I don't really thing there is a "proper" layout for 3 wheels. Both one in the front or one in the back work.
One of the layouts works much better than the other.

Hint: It's not this one....
cyndieallemann-2013-aa-tm-0039.jpg
 
There's a reason they aren't sold anymore as well....
That's because people are morons that don't know how to ride, not because they are unsafe. Do some research before making claims you know nothing about. I could go into a long post about how wrong you are but I'll save you the trouble.
 
I'm torn between uncool, meh and cool. To make this quick I'll say that meh is up as an option because it would make it easy and it's the most default for unsure choice. Now uncool, would be due to it being closely related to a bike with enough to make it seem like a car. Bikes are not allowed and automatically seriously uncool.

However, I do see it as cool because of this retro look, WWII fighter plane war paint graphics on the right vehicle is cool. Among other things...
 
That's because people are morons that don't know how to ride, not because they are unsafe. Do some research before making claims you know nothing about. I could go into a long post about how wrong you are but I'll save you the trouble.
To save you even more time from a rant.

I don't agree with your view of things, so that automatically makes me (and anyone else that differs with your views) wrong.
 
To save you even more time from a rant.

I don't agree with your view of things, so that automatically makes me (and anyone else that differs with your views) wrong.

No, in this case it doesn't make you wrong because you disagree with how I think 3 wheeled vehicles should be laid out (because as you might recall, I said it works both ways for me). It does make you look like an idiot because you have entirely no idea, or even the slightest clue of what you are even talking about when it comes to three wheeled ATV's. Saying "there is a reason they aren't sold anymore" is proving that you are either arrogant or lacking knowledge on the subject.

So it's design obviously sucked too

This is the thing. The CPSC (Consumer Product Safety Commission) did very in-depth studies on three wheel ATV's, and concluded there was and I quote "no inherent flaws in the three wheel design that would render the vehicle unsafe for consumer usage" and actually found more people are injured on four wheeled ATV's by a rate of 3/1000 people for three wheelers and 9/1000 in four wheelers, but noting that three wheelers take more seat time to learn to ride properly. People think they can just hop on and go and pull off stupid stunts. Four wheels gives people a false sense of security and in turn they lose respect for what the machine can do.

The study concluded that nearly all injuries on three wheeled ATV's were due to operator error, and NOT flaws in the vehicles design. What was even more shocking was that in the 15 or so years three wheelers were sold at dealerships, more injuries were recorded in the first 5 years four wheeled ATV's were out then the entire 15 year span of three wheelers. To ride properly at speed, you must counter lean and slide a three wheeler through turns, so that your shifting weight keeps the machine stable. You must also do this one four wheeled ATV's, at speed otherwise you roll it.

Manufacturers were required to later provide free rider training and include warning labels with the risks of operating an ATV on the machines, and as a result, injury reports dropped a large percentage. Three wheelers were basically the first ATV and what happened was that it was bad timing for the release, and because of this no one really knew that injuries would skyrocket so the media got uptight and then the consensual agreement was signed between the manufacturers and the CPSC to stop marketing them and selling them, NOT because they were unsafe. Because of this, this is where the whole "they were banned, illegal and unsafe" stereotypes came in, which is NOT the case at all and anyone who believes that is a moron. The riders who lack common sense and education are the people who make them suicide machines. Learn to ride a machine properly, respect it, don't ride past your limits, and take the proper safety precautions such as wearing a helmet. It's the same thing with guns. Only people make them dangerous.
 
Last edited:
Four wheeled ATV's are no safer actually. To say one is safer than the other is misleading, they are as safe as you ride them.

I have personally crashed both.:dopey:
Neither feel too good :lol:
 
NSX isn't sold anymore either...

So it's design obviously sucked too

Neither are Pontiac Firebirds; if someone wanted an equally meaningless comparison.


One could probably even make a convincing argument about that one, but both statements are in another time zone from GTPorsche's point anyway (which was about a drivetrain layout and the stability therein relating to them no longer being sold) so it would be irrelevant to do so. A much better comparison would be to, say, rear engined family cars; which there is similarly nothing inherently wrong with but whose notable driving characteristic differences from regular cars makes them more dangerous unless you have the experience with their foibles).
 
Last edited:
There's actually so many aspects of this car that collide that it probably totals out to Meh.

Yes it's amazing to look at and engineering and everything that's good about lightweights. But you'd still look a berk in it. A drowned berk in its home country too.
Plus as an actual car, it's not that good.
Morgan itself doesn't have the most solid image either.
 
Sub 0

Old School look
Good power to weight ratio
Handmade.
3 wheels.
Made from wood.

 
Last edited:
I see a few people completely missed the sarcasm of my post :lol:

Seems like that's just a quick deflection to save face, also as said for the nth time if it was sarcasm conveying it over the internet is quite hard. Try informing people next time in the actual post.:dopey:
 
Only people make them dangerous.

With this... I agree. Four-wheeled ATVs should, on the face of it, be more stable, but a hell of a lot of people who get hurt when they turn the things over.
The big problem with three-wheeled cars with the single in front is the weight balance and engine placement. The Robin has its engine in exactly the wrong place. High up near the front wheel. ATVs are better, the engine is down low in the center, and more weight is concentrated over the rear tires.

You actually want more of the weight concentrated between the rear wheels with that kind of layout. I've driven Chinese tripods that failed to try to kill me because the manufacturer put that nice, heavy engine behind the rear tires, where it belongs. (They're still incredibly scary, because they're upright little things with bedsprings for suspensions)

This is how the Nissan Deltawing works. Proper weight balance and design. Conventional wisdom used to be you couldn't get something like that to work, but then, the 911 has been defying conventional wisdom for decades.

That said, I still find the Morgan sexier than a three-wheel ATV. Go figure. :lol:
 
Back