LuminisI guess that's much of the problem right there.
Making a game for the driving experience is cool and all, but a game is a game. It's never going to give someone the same joy of driving as he'd get inr eal life, so it kinda has to offer more than just a good 'driving experience' (if you can call it that) to keep people attention for longer periods of time...
That's cool and all, however, from what I can tell, one of the reasons for disappointment I think I've read the most around here is the lack of a racing feel, a competitive spirit, so to speak. So yeah, it's cool that you enjoy the game as a driving sim, but I think it's a pretty valid opinion and point to make.That's a matter of opinion. It's always been a driving game first racing game second. Some of us like it that way. I love driving, I have a decent ride (IMO 91 GTi with 98 VR6 swap) however I'd like to experience (as close as can be & within consideration) driving some other rides, mostly the unobtainable. GT does it for me, and it's doing well enough wether you like it or not. It's not a game for most, some of us appreciate the series for what it is and commend Kaz for staying true to that for all these years.
This is just a guess, but... I think Kaz just cares about the money. Sorry, I don't see him (or any other company) actually 'caring' about their customers. It's just a way to make money, if you make them feel that way.I think Kaz is more appreciative of us then any other & works to giving us what has become the "Gran Turismo" experience, more then just a game.
I am, but it certainly wouldn't hurt GT if it actually offered some actualy racing, too. If you could participate in free runs (which is basically what you're doing now) and races (what I think is lacking in GT5), it would be a win/win situation, wouldn't it?If your looking for more of a game or racing game, maybe you should look someplace else.
If your worried about engine sounds in the game, your not in it for the racing or the competition. You can buy a cd/mp3 filled with all your favorite car sounds if you want improved sounds.QUOTE]
Hey buddy, I actually PAID to get those sounds. And I'm in it for the experience. If Ferrari engines sounded like vacuum cleaners they would not sell for 200K$, if you know what I mean. A sim is about the feeling of immersion it gives you.
I completely understand what you say about features but to me this is just unacceptable. When you play a sim, the seat of the pant feeling you get from driving a real car is not there so you need to get everything else right if you want to be as close as possible to the real thing.![]()
That's a matter of opinion. It's always been a driving game first racing game second. Some of us like it that way. I love driving, I have a decent ride (IMO 91 GTi with 98 VR6 swap) however I'd like to experience (as close as can be & within consideration) driving some other rides, mostly the unobtainable. GT does it for me, and it's doing well enough wether you like it or not. It's not a game for most, some of us appreciate the series for what it is and commend Kaz for staying true to that for all these years. I think Kaz is more appreciative of us then any other & works to giving us what has become the "Gran Turismo" experience, more then just a game. If your looking for more of a game or racing game, maybe you should look someplace else.
This is just a guess, but... I think Kaz just cares about the money. Sorry, I don't see him (or any other company) actually 'caring' about their customers. It's just a way to make money, if you make them feel that way.
I think it is growing however people think things are just too easy. When GT3 was released it had a very small ( in comparison) car list. It's because they were transitioning to a new system that required they redo all the cars. Gt4 was an upgrade to GT3 however it still used the coding/detailing of GT3 only improved. GT5 is the same as in it's the first for the PS3, a system much more difficult to code for & with a much higher level of detail. GT5P was them releasing a title giving a taste of what was to come at that stage of development. I think people were expecting GT5 to be more of a GT6 to GT5P as GT3 was to GT4. I feel confident that GT6 will have that level of refinement GT4 had, if they don't just do all major refinements to GT5 through updates (something they were unable to do on the PS2 system.) I've already read that Kaz intends on upgrading cars from Standard to Premium, patience is a virtue.
It's not changing Because it's staying true to what it is, there are many other games more suited to the racing experience.
that's why I keep saying that it should be labeled "The Real Grinding Simulator"
Not all of us work just for the money mate, some of us have jobs we love and strive for... and I reckon Kaz is that type of person. Gran Turismo is not a paycheck for him; I would wager that it is a way of life.
Admittedly he's probably late quite often, forgets things or gets his priorities mixed up but then show me a genius that doesn't break some eggs while making an omelette.
I just don't feel much ingenuity coming from GT5, might be the reason why I kinda stopped in believing Kaz was that kind of person. That and the fact that I can't see the touch of a perfectionist like he's always made out to be in the game, either.
I hear that's because you're a dumb dumb know nothing who isn't capable of understanding or seeing 'the vision'..
![]()
That's a matter of opinion. It's always been a driving game first racing game second. Some of us like it that way. I love driving, I have a decent ride (IMO 91 GTi with 98 VR6 swap) however I'd like to experience (as close as can be & within consideration) driving some other rides, mostly the unobtainable. GT does it for me, and it's doing well enough wether you like it or not. It's not a game for most, some of us appreciate the series for what it is and commend Kaz for staying true to that for all these years. I think Kaz is more appreciative of us then any other & works to giving us what has become the "Gran Turismo" experience, more then just a game. If your looking for more of a game or racing game, maybe you should look someplace else.
CERBERA_LMEh? Of course it's a game, and it's a racing game.
I guess that's much of the problem right there.
Making a game for the driving experience is cool and all, but a game is a game. It's never going to give someone the same joy of driving as he'd get inr eal life, so it kinda has to offer more than just a good 'driving experience' (if you can call it that) to keep people attention for longer periods of time...
It's not a racing game but a "Driving" game. It would seam that fact is hard for some to understand.
How could anybody care about somebody wanting GT to change when what's made it so great for all these years is the fact it's stayed true to itself and changed as little as possible.
It's not a racing game but a "Driving" game. It would seam that fact is hard for some to understand.
How could anybody care about somebody wanting GT to change when what's made it so great for all these years is the fact it's stayed true to itself and changed as little as possible.
Not all of us work just for the money mate, some of us have jobs we love and strive for... and I reckon Kaz is that type of person. Gran Turismo is not a paycheck for him; I would wager that it is a way of life.
I'm sorry, it's a driving simulation, but a racing game. If it wasn't a racing game, you wouldn't be racing. If it was a driving game, then you would have free movement around a city (a la Grand Theft Auto) obeying traffic signals and keeping to the speed limit. That is what driving is to 99.9% of people in the world.
As for the car sounds, I've seen vids and pics of them recording cars since GT1 which just showed 'how dedicated they were to getting it right'.I don't know what they were recording onto though, cassette? Would explain the lack bass.
![]()
![]()
As for driving or racing game, I think it's a matter of how you define both terms.
If you say that driving around a track trying to cross the finish line first is racing (which it is), GT5 is a racing game, yes. However, there are a couple of crucial things either wrong or missing for it to be a racing game, which is what I suppose people are referring to:
- there is no qualifying
- the AI is slow, dodgy and drives inconsistently
- you always start in the middle of the field
- a lot of events are designed questionably
- a lot of possible events are missing
So if one defines racing as qualifying for position beforehand and having to fight hard to become #1, which technically is correct, calling GT5 a racing game is not quite on the spot.
I'm disappointed in GT5 the way a parent is disappointed in their genius child making a mess of his life. So much potential and is this all she can do?
However, you still love them. Critical when they mess up, offer suggestions when needed, praise when deserved. But they still do what they want to do. Shows occasional flash of brilliance, but keep messing up the simplest things![]()
Qualifying is neither here nor there for me, and does not disqualify (pardon the pun) GT5 from being a racing game. Plenty of racing games don't have qualification.
If it actually made a difference where you qualified, qualifying being missing would be a big thing. As it is, you could start at the back at it wouldn't make much difference. It's that AI again.![]()
![]()
Don't you think it would be easier to gauge a cars competitiveness if you could firstly practise then qualify? As long as it's an OPTION, then it hurts no-one. People who want to do what happens now could just start the race and start 7th as normal. But those who would want to qualify could too, and as you say people could qualify last for more of a challenge. Everyones happy with that scenario.