Is anyone else on Fuelly? Post your MPG here!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Event
  • 112 comments
  • 7,787 views
Yes sir. Shifting around 4000rpm seems to work best. BTW I have a 6 speed so the gears are really close which I think kinda hurts my economy.

Yeah, at least while the engine is cold and a bit lumpy. Though mine'll happily change at no more than about 2k if I'm just keeping up with city traffic.

Skip gears then?

Doesn't necessarily work, as it often means you spend longer in the lower gears anyway. It's more economical to use all the gears (as that way you're in the meat of the torque more often), just using fewer revs in each gear.
 
I shouldn't think it does any damage unless you're attempting skipped changes at higher engine speeds or under lots of load. And even then, only if you're trying to change quickly, and if you're skipping gears I don't see why you'd be attempting fast changes anyway. Skipping gears is only really likely to put a bit more strain on the clutch, I should think.

As I mentioned though there's no real economy benefit, otherwise all the hypermilers would be doing it. The most economical way to drive is by using the engine at it's most efficient point, and by skipping a gear you're more than likely having to be at higher revs than that point in a lower gear to then change to a higher gear where your revs are below their most efficient.

At a minimum it saves a bit of hassle. If the speed limit you're in is low enough you might find that some intermediate gears are unnecessary as you don't need their acceleration, so you could skip to top gear earlier.
 
27.9mpg over 49 fill-ups. It's been dropping a little bit, I'm having too many spirited drives this summer.
 
Haven't signed up on there, but I average 16mpg around town and 30-35mpg highway.

Not bad for a 13 year old supercharged tank.

I forgot to add I used to get 19-21 mpg city before some environuts decided to put 10% ethanol in all the gas.

Also, my absolute best recorded mpg was ~46mpg on a 100% highway trip drafting behind a motorhome @ 45mph.
 
Caining my ST170 about 15mpg.
If I wanted economy I'd go out on my Cagiva Mito. 1 week on £12. Now that's economy.
 
Caining my ST170 about 15mpg.
If I wanted economy I'd go out on my Cagiva Mito. 1 week on £12. Now that's economy.

Not sure what I'd get if I thrashed the MX5. In normal driving with a bit of thrashing the least I've got is about 28mpg in UK gallons, which isn't shabby at all. I have heard stories of people with MX5s on throttle bodies getting 10mpg though :lol:

I seem to remember from when I used to frequent bike forums that most people on Mitos, or indeed any other 125cc smokers, used to get around 50-55mpg.

So it's good considering the performance, but also pretty pathetic at the same time for something that only carries yourself, and perhaps a pillion at an absolute push. 4-stroke 125s can get a fair way north of 100mpg, though of course 4-strokes don't have the power of 2-strokes.

Most bikes aren't really economy machines though. They aren't particularly aerodynamically efficient and they're generally tuned much more towards performance. And ridden in a style that makes use of that performance. The bare economy figures don't sound too bad but then you have to consider that they're very light and still only manage the figures they manage, usually with only one person on board too.

The economy sweet spot with bikes seems to be 125cc four-strokes, either geared like a CG125 or something, or CVT like all the scooters. They're easily the least polluting too, apart from the very few 50cc 4-strokes on the market.
 
I forgot to add I used to get 19-21 mpg city before some environuts decided to put 10% ethanol in all the gas.

Also, my absolute best recorded mpg was ~46mpg on a 100% highway trip drafting behind a motorhome @ 45mph.

Go track down some Shell V-power. Ethanol free.
 
Go track down some Shell V-power. Ethanol free.

Not around here. All gas is 10% ethanol, says so on the pump.

E10 is required in Chicago. Some stations down in central/ southern Illinois are ethanol free.
 
Didn't know cities could make a law on what gas is sold there. That's stupid.
 
Didn't know cities could make a law on what gas is sold there. That's stupid.

Unfortunately they can. Chicago's not the only one.

And even though I live ~30 minutes outside the city we are still in the same county (Cook) as Chicago, so it applies to us.
 
My last three fill-ups have been 31, 26, and 27 mpg. With today's I'm going to try my best to keep from burying the needle when I get the urge, and not going out just for a drive.
 
Unfortunately they can. Chicago's not the only one.

And even though I live ~30 minutes outside the city we are still in the same county (Cook) as Chicago, so it applies to us.

I live about an hour south of Chicago and I'm pretty sure that all of the local stations that I go to have 10% ethanol mix.
 
Done 2 fuel ups on my recently acquired 1999 Clio Mk2 1.4 8V

Average UK mpg is 44.9 with the best between fuel ups being 46.9mpg

Not too bad. That is bang on the manufacturer's quoted figures for the combined cycle. 👍 Impressive for an 11 y/o car
 
Reviving thread.

I've only tracked two fill ups so far, and I'm at an average of 6.4L/100km in an '03 Corolla (1.8L).

I think that might be a little low, because the one time I filled up past full, and it was the first recording off the odometer, so it might be a little skewed for now.
 
Now averaging just over 35mpg (US), about 43-44mpg UK:

graph4367.gif


My last few tanks have been pretty good though, all above Fiat's claimed figures.
 
I don't have a pretty chart, but according to my calculations I managed 45MPG on a 180 mile round trip today, so apparently sticking rigorously to a sensible speed does get some results. And a good quarter of that was sitting in some congestion that Boris created for me by 'improving' the North Circular, so cut that out and I'd probably have managed even more.
 
I don't have a pretty chart, but according to my calculations I managed 45MPG on a 180 mile round trip today, so apparently sticking rigorously to a sensible speed does get some results. And a good quarter of that was sitting in some congestion that Boris created for me by 'improving' the North Circular, so cut that out and I'd probably have managed even more.

It would surprise me if your SporK wasn't capable of some pretty reasonable figures, given how easy it was to get my Fiesta over 50mpg without a lot of effort.

I think the Fiat would only break 50mpg on a tank if the majority of my driving was on 60mph national speed limit roads rather than 70mph motorways. It's too low-geared for really high fuel economy, but the low to mid 40s I'm getting aren't bad at all considering I've never had a truly saintly tank where economy has been the main goal.
 
It would surprise me if your SporK wasn't capable of some pretty reasonable figures, given how easy it was to get my Fiesta over 50mpg without a lot of effort.

I think the Fiat would only break 50mpg on a tank if the majority of my driving was on 60mph national speed limit roads rather than 70mph motorways. It's too low-geared for really high fuel economy, but the low to mid 40s I'm getting aren't bad at all considering I've never had a truly saintly tank where economy has been the main goal.

Mmmm mine's much the same. In 5th it's happy with about 50-55mph, beyond that and it's 'why can't I change up' territory. I thought the Panda had a 6th gear to get away from this issue, though?
 
I've been getting 30-31 mpg in my '89 Mercury Tracer (2 door hatchback, 4 cylinder) going up and down the interstate to work. This last time, though, I got almost 35 even though I took it out a couple times for some spirited driving on deserted back roads (Yes, you can do spirited driving in an 80 hp car). The guy I bought it from said he got 40 mpg on average, but he was driving a 60 mph highway to and from work every day rather than the interstate like I am. Personally? I managed 40 mpg once in the year or so I've had this car; most of the time it's in the low-mid 30s.

In any case, pretty good for a twenty year old car with ~230k miles on it.
 
Mmmm mine's much the same. In 5th it's happy with about 50-55mph, beyond that and it's 'why can't I change up' territory. I thought the Panda had a 6th gear to get away from this issue, though?

Nope, Fiat fit a 6th but forgot to make it a cruising gear. Whilst this is good for acceleration and means downchanges are rarely needed at motorway speeds (and it can pull in 6th from 30mph), economy is nowhere near as good as it could be. I think it's doing about 3,500rpm at 70mph, which is 1,000rpm higher than it really should be doing.

A 7th gear wouldn't go amiss...
 
After finding out there is only one other 1991 FC on Fuelly (and it's cleaner than mine) I just joined! I'll take a closer look when I'm home from work.
 
Nope, Fiat fit a 6th but forgot to make it a cruising gear. Whilst this is good for acceleration and means downchanges are rarely needed at motorway speeds (and it can pull in 6th from 30mph), economy is nowhere near as good as it could be. I think it's doing about 3,500rpm at 70mph, which is 1,000rpm higher than it really should be doing.

A 7th gear wouldn't go amiss...

Again, exactly the same as mine. Does beg the question though - why did they bother sticking the extra gear in there?!
 
Just filled up yesterday and averaged 19mpg for my last tank. Highest I remember getting since before they put ethanol in the gas here.

nterestingly I get better mpg with performance shift turned on.
 
Pretty cool website... I usually track it in a book but I'll try this method.

Currently im getting 20-22 in an 01 Acura RL.
 
Back