Whatever. The point was that GT7 needs to be a breaktrough. For me, updated plus interesting Car list will be a huge breaking point.EA didn't win me back with the new NFS...
PD has a better chance though...
Whatever. The point was that GT7 needs to be a breaktrough. For me, updated plus interesting Car list will be a huge breaking point.EA didn't win me back with the new NFS...
PD has a better chance though...
Ah, ok. I didn't realise that an update every month was something that had actually been said (presumably by PD).
After enduring 4 months of Project BUGS, I am now thinking of returning with my tail between my legs to GT6! The only thing holding me back is those awful engine sounds, made even more awful for me because of the excellent ones in P CARS. If I do return, GT6 will only end for me once they turn the online off, as that's pretty much all I do in this game.
Neither of those will happen.Imagine the possibility If PS4 has backwards compability like XBone.
Probably just getting a GT6 remastered edition.
Project BUGS I looooooooled !
User thinks he has to be the cool boy, decides to kid the OP instead of actually get his point.OP remembers some enthusiastic threads, thinks there hasn't been
an update for at least two weeks, decides to write an orbituary.
Anyway, what's the difference between the end and a new beginning?
Take me to the distant past, I want to go back.
The mod team know the reasons for course makers lack of appearance , but are equally terrified that Kaz will stop giving them access and interviews that stuff like that is all they are willing to say . Non disclosure agreements etc will be brought up if discussed .
Better off just parroting Kaz's " Soon " if you ask me . The reason will be something to do with the team being split to work on the rumoured GT Sport / GT7 , or fukushima , or Kaz lost his pencils or something ... Nobody ( Just a handful of people at best ) really cares anymore .
Ah, ok. I didn't realise that an update every month was something that had actually been said (presumably by PD).
Well you certainly seem to care as you've done this several times already, and you're clearly speaking from a position of having no experience with handling, knowing, or even having the faintest hint of information that would otherwise be considered sensitive for any number of reasons and that's fine because you're in the mindset of "Well if you know something, then you should tell us!" and, again, that's fine because at this point in the life of things you'd want something to sink your teeth into; something concrete.
Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. You've all been told why on numerous occasions in the past, and an NDA, when imposed, is only one of those reasons. This is of course going along with what you think that meant in the first place.
Breaking an NDA is a serious no no. You'll find yourself out of the info loop rapidly.
That's saying there even is an NDA? I haven't heard about one but then I wouldn't expect to, seeing as the course maker is still listed as coming in a "future update" that we can all still see.
What's got me wondering though is where he says the course maker's release date is "up in the air". Hardly confidence inspiring after this amount of time but I suppose it could be a red herring to an NDA...if the NDA exists. Or is there an NDA about an NDA?
/Takes tin foil hat off.
I'm not even interested in the course maker. I love the intrigue of NDA's though.
If info is given on a basis that it cannot be publicly revealed before a specific time, then that is bound by NDA.Go and read the about the course maker thread for a better picture on the nda situation. GTP is not nda bound, its only PD.
If you could link me to the thread or a specific comment by the staff talking about NDA's, I'd appreciate it. I tend to avoid course maker threads so no idea which one you mean. I have looked though. Honestly.