I really don't understand how you can't improve with the DFGT. Did you put it on "simulation" mode yet? Also, try adding bungie cords around the pedals. I've got the same wheel and the feedback is perfect for driving just about any car at the limit.
Don't have the GT-R. I have a 240z but its on my list of cars to try. Since the transmission has a lower top speed compared to the 280z I ran this season, I might have luck installing some expensive mods to get it to 385pp. That's actually my next task...find cars that are far enough below 385 that I can slap on a turbo or stage 2 engine tuning. My MR2 from Tuesdays started and will end with a mid-rpm turbo. I figured if I placed low enough, I could still upgrade it at the end of the season...but I never made enough cash to install a high-rpm turbo.
And even though I would bet that between Huyler, Bowtie, and Diabolic, we will see at least two small MRs, I think everyone else has a chance of keeping up with them in the standings if we can just not wreck.
You are probably right. I'm going to give the little 206 a good go tonight....a final Hoo-rah for the FF class for me. With the added power, should be able to hop over at least 1 person in the standings, though I'm hopinng for two. Either way, the Tiburon, the Talon, both MGs and some random FRs are in the running for me.
Just did an hour testing session with some 385 or less cars. I used GVE-R as my testing ground because it showcases straight line speed as well as cornering speeds. I can run consistent laps and follow my ghost to know how a car is performing. Some I pushed hard for the times, others not so much but I generally put in about 5 laps and they were within 3 10ths of each other once I got a rhythm going.
1:20.684 Toyota MR2 Spyder '99 -- Just plain fast, but transmission tops out at 143...meaning you'll have to sandbag for the tranny at some point in the season.
1:21.150 Mazda Roadster 1.8 RS '98 -- not as quick as the MR but corners cleaner.
1:21.398 Nissan 240zg '71 -- nice car, but no turbo option.
1:21.480 MG TF160 '03 -- Felt slow compared to the MR2 but is still a decent ride
1:21.643 Hyundai Tiberon Turbulence '99 -- It's an FF but not too shabby
1:21.656 Toyota MR2 '86 -- With a mid rpm turbo to start, this car is still a contender. I'll have to test the SC version later.
1:21.939 Nissan SILVIA Q's AERO (S14) '93 -- Very tall gears, and no turbo option. No thanks.
1:21.950 Eagle Talon Esi '97 -- Add 10 more pp and it could be a good starting point...but might run out of steam at the end of the season.
1:22.134 206 S16 '99 -- Still a decent ride
1:22.286 Honda CR-X del Sol SiR '92 -- Fast out of the final turn, but no torque or corner grip. Might be acceptable given the tracks we plan to run.
1:22.574 G20 '90
1:22.891 280z '78 -- If I couldn't win with it this season, I won't next season either.
1:22.921 Mazda Protege '02 -- Felt unbelievably slow, tall gears and no power.
1:23.645 Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1800GSR '83 -- woof, woof, its a dog.
1:26.077 Alpha Giulia Sprint GTA 1600 '65 -- Fun to drive, but very slow.
** Italic cars were from previous testing session at 375pp...meaning they might still be contenders. I still need to test the 86 MR2 SC, some Miatas, and a few more FFs.
I must have done engine refreshes on a dozen other cars to find out they were over 385pp so that's all I actually got to test.
Yeah I know...you got a boost from Diabolic. I should have stayed inside to get the boost from you but I was planning on taking the turn full speed. It's all good though. That was a fun race. I can't believe how much bumping and rubbing we did without getting any damage. I wish everyone could race like that...although the CS tires does serve as an equalizer.Great fun in the 385 cars too. Huyler, I checked the replay, and my turn @ the top of the straight was a bit cheeky. I definitely stuffed you, and pushed you out.. that little civic was fun![]()
Why test the '02 and '03 if only up to '01 is allowed? Am I missing something here?
I gotta check the transmission on the Miata to see if it will last the whole season.
Anyone else think the tranny should be a free-bee?
Yes, the transmission may limit top speed, but... Huyler won the series, even with a poor finish in the last race. It may affect a race, but it doesn't appear to have affected the season?
I don't know. Would it be better to just pick some different tracks so the transmission is not that big a concern?
Just for reference, I did not change the transmission on the Talon.
You're going to call me out on OLR?? Really? It was the last lap of the last race. I only had one shot at getting 3rd place and I took it. Yes we crashed, but you leg out the part where you ave me engine damage after not breaking after I crashed you. It was completely fair payback, and was not OLR compliant. So. I ran fair all season, and decided to have a blast on the last lap of the season. Any issues?
I won the series because I judged my mods vs transmission top speed appropriately. If I made an extra 10-15k to install some more weight reduction or power mods I would have topped out my transmission. It was slow at the start of the season but I compensated for it by installing the mid-rpm turbo at the beginning. Had I been given the opportunity to install a transmission I would have picked the high-rpm turbo at the start and geared appropriately for it. The fact is though, I passed on a bunch of car options because they didn't have a top speed fast enough for half of the tracks.Yes, the transmission may limit top speed, but... Huyler won the series, even with a poor finish in the last race. It may affect a race, but it doesn't appear to have affected the season? Just for reference, I did not change the transmission on the Talon.
As the rules are now, installing the transmission will essentially kill your chances at being competitive because it results in not being able to afford other mods. It also narrows the car selection down because you know you are stuck with the stock transmission for the entire series.
The point is that cars that have good gearing to start will continue to have good gearing, and cars that had bad gearing will gain back that disadvantage. You can have two cars with exactly the same specs, but one will be slower because it has bad gearing. In order to become equal you would need to spend 20k on a transmission, but then the other car that had good gearing to start will spend that 20k elsewhere. The result is that both cars may be geared to do 170mph, but only the car that was geared that way stock will have the power to do it.
Regarding tracks, I think next season is the best selection of tracks we've had so far. The jumping between fast circuits and tight circuits last season resulted in a lot of compromise in car setup. I think we'll have more people really going for it with the new schedule.
Allowing the transmission will certainly open up the selection, but it wall also remove the lemon aspect of battling your car. Maybe we could reduce the cost of the transmission to like 2,500 or 5,000 credits to lessen the burden on the drivers that choose it.
Honestly, 11 people is pretty good for an 8 week series. I set up the scoring system for 10 drivers so that if we had people drop out it wouldn't drastically change the scoring. However, when you get 16 for the first 2 races then only 10, the drivers that didn't place well the first few races kind of get screwed on points unless we go back and re-score things (which we could do if someone feels slighted).We need to do a better job next season of choosing people to race who will show up al the time. I really wanted to get into the wed too but it was full and this was nealry full at the start but ended with just 10-11 normally.
BTKI'm not saying what I did was fair, and yes it was a blast. But I dont think I should be moved to an 8th place finish for fun, and yes I know no one said anything like this.
As for transmissions. The price of the transmission is extremely high but it adds to the difficulty of the series. If you can find a fast car with good gears you win