- 7,517

- Connecticut
- Cowboys965
I think the Badminton players shouldn't of been DQd, it's just a strategy to take advantage of the flawed tournament setup.
It was pure gamesmanship all round - they were attempting to take advantage of the circumstances (i.e. the results that had already happened), not the set-up per se, but in doing so, they made a mockery of the tournament, their sport, their teams, and the people who paid good money to watch top sportspersons performing to the best of their abilities. Hopefully this will teach them a lesson - that it's not all about winning, but taking part (and winning) with dignity.I think the Badminton players shouldn't of been DQd, it's just a strategy to take advantage of the flawed tournament setup.
I dont think anything is up for grabs in the cycling..as its only the heats..
First of all, please excuse me for my grammatical errors, English is not my native language.
I disagree with the decision to DQ the badminton players, why? because in my opinion, those 8 players are already gone through to the next stage, logically, they already "win THE match" using their best efforts, and did not need to do anymore effort to win another (there's no point in winning another, they already gone through right?).
Team GB get a WR in the women's team qualification round after being .4 down on their opponents.
Team GB get a WR in the women's team qualification round after being .4 down on their opponents.
And completely oblivious to the entire forum, GB has another silver medal in judo.
To be fair though, it's not surprising we got a 1-2 in canoe slalom - in a country where rain happens a lot, we'd be expected to perform on the water!
Whist sitting down.![]()
TheCrackerThe sport?
Kneeling. You sit in a kayak, you kneel in a canoe.
Don't you have that backwards?
Official results:
"Unofficial"
FamineNope.
![]()
I don't think this is cheating or disgrace, this is pure strategy. And trying to lose so that I don't have to defeat my own compatriot early is also a strategy (national strategy I must say?), and nothing wrong with that IMHO. I don't have problem with that at all. In fact, they were not really trying to lose, they have already won and gone through remember? they're just using the extra match to gain advantage by choosing the opponent, IMO it's smart, not cheating.
Now about the angry spectators, in my opinion it's their own fault in the first place for watching that match.. what do you expect from two teams that already gone through? nothing! of course.. that match didn't matter.
The Chinese set the WR legally (as did GB), but both were disqualified from later rounds, so the records will stand... I can't remember if China also broke the WR in the final, but that would be wiped if they did...So does the WR stand? Or what?
Don't you have that backwards?